The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.
"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01
"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."
Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution
Sunday, 21 June 2009
Sunday Paper Review: 21st June 2009
The Observer, for example, reports on a "confidential memo" (or at least it was) which it says outlined plans to provoke the war with Iraq. This one will cause an almighty row, we feel. The newspaper also notes that there's a separate inquiry going on in The Netherlands that will publish it's report in November. So, The Talking Clock wonders whether it's worth putting £10 on Gormless calling an October General Election..?
The Independent on Sunday picks up on what many other papers have which is the assertion that Tony Blair was instrumental in getting the Iraq inquiry made private, but the IoS also ponders whether any move to hold the Iraq inquiry in public would scupper Tony Blair's hopes of becoming the EU President. Oooh, do we sniff conspiracy theory in the air? We do like one of those.
Meanwhile, the Sunday Times reveals that Gormless is far from secure as, it says, the Cabinet turned on him last week and started openly questioning his tactics for taking on the Tories. There's a "cabinet split" about our Gormless, apparently. Didn't half a dozen who couldn't abide Gormless just this minute walk? And those that remained are still split? Oooh, that imminent summer Parliamentary recess - will it be a curse or a blessing for our Unelected PM..?
The Mail on Sunday has a story which speculates on Gormless resigning BEFORE the next General Election to avoid suffering a humiliating defeat. They suggest he could announce he's going in the New Year. Only another six months of ruining the country and gifting us lock, stock and barrel to the European Union, then...
However, before proud British patriots get too excited at the hopes of having a country left to try and pull back from Brussels, the News of the World carries an interview-ette in which Gormless insists he will lead Labour into the next General Election. Which, in a bittersweet way, we're rather pleased about... for somewhat 'sadistic pleasure' reasons, you understand.
Now, we've waited a week for an official response from the Tories over Ken Clarke's comments on BBC1's The Politics Show last Sunday. Still nothing official, but there's a report in The Telegraph which says David Cameron has been telling Conservative MPs not to listen to Ken Clarke on the matter - that they're still as opposed to the Lisbon Treaty as ever and that Ken Clarke has been "slapped down" over his comments. The article is supported in a comment piece by the ever likable Dan Hannan who tries to reassure his followers (The Talking Clock included) that David Cameron's supposed eurosceptic position is for real while accusing Peter Mandelson of sacrificing the Labour Party on the table of EU subservience. This leaves us in a quandary. We like Dan Hannan. We mostly trust Dan Hannan. We want to believe Dan Hannan. But do we trust any British politician not to betray our nation over Europe anymore? Maybe the Conservatives should make their manifesto a legally binding document, somehow...
1 comments:
This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.
"Maybe the Conservatives should make their manifesto a legally binding document, somehow..." - Well they could but who is going to sue them for not letting matters rest there enough?
ReplyDelete