By contrast, the Independent on Sunday reports that Sir Paul McCartney is going to tell the EU how it's important that we all eat less meat to save the planet from global warming. That ludicrous story again. How many more will get on this same train? Still, he's only telling the EU. They'll make us do whatever they want as we have no democratic voice there. Easy victory for the climate change and vegetarian lobby, methinks. Anyone for a Linda McCartney tofu treat? The same report quotes Tory MEP Edward McMillan-Scott who says: "There is growing support for eating less meat so as to reduce global warming and to improve personal health." And less support for the Conservatives from this blogger as a result of such espoused views.
Meanwhile, Shadow "climate change" secretary Greg Clark is up in arms about the fact that the BNP's Nick Griffin will be part of an EU delegation to the Copenhagen
The Sunday Times reports that Zac Goldsmith - the "green advisor" to Conservative leader David Cameron - has non-domicile tax status which, the newspaper says, enables him to "avoid huge sums of tax on his estimated £200m fortune". Strangely, he is also standing for Parliament as the Conservative candidate for Richmond Park. So, if you want to know who is behind the nonsense 'green' policies of the Conservatives, it's a multi-millionaire who officially doesn't even live in the UK but who is standing for our Parliament. Interesting...
Staying with the Conservatives and democracy, the Sunday Express suggests that Michael Ashcroft - who it describes as the "Tory bankroller" - will become one of the most influential people in Britain if the Conservatives win the General Election. Ashcroft, who is based in Belize, is apparently set to become a "back-room dealer".
Meanwhile, the Mail on Sunday picks up on news that has been reported elsewhere and questions why BBC weatherman Paul Hudson apparently had the leaked ClimateGate emails several weeks ago but chose to do absolutely nothing with them - raising question marks about not acting in the public interest over such information.
And the News of the World reports on a study which suggests that 9 out of 10 people who phoned the swine flu hotline were misdiagnosed and that only 10% of those tested actually had the swine flu they had been diagnosed with. We've long known that most people can't tell the difference between the common cold and influenza, so are we really surprised? Anyway, nice to have a study blowing holes in some of the 'swine flu' hysteria. Will we ever know how many people ever actually had 'swine flu'..? Rhetorical question...
0 comments:
Post a Comment
This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.