Poor Al Gore. Hounded by protesters who chant "Al Gore, carbon whore" at him wherever he goes in the U.S., he might have thought he was amongst friends at the 'climate con' conference in Copenhagen.
But he's just made himself his own worst enemy.
In his conference speech, Gore dropped the name of Dr. Wieslav Maslowski in order to substantiate a grand claim about ice at the Arctic.
However, Dr. Maslowski has publicly rebutted Gore's claims, saying that he doesn't know where Gore is getting his figures from.
Now there's an inconvenient truth!
Meanwhile, the unrepresented majority of us in the UK who think this is all a great con have just found an unlikely democratically elected representative... the BNP's Nick Griffin!
According to the Daily Telegraph, Griffin has "accused world leaders at the Copenhagen climate conference of the 'biggest hoax in history' that will kill more people than the great famines under Stalin and Mao."
He says that the turning over of land to biofuels instead of food production "on the basis of an unproven theory that is contradicted by an increasing number of scientists" will result in "a crime against humanity which in future will be seen as an enormous man-made famine".
The messenger is unpalatable to many, but we have to give respect where it is due - and Nick Griffin has said a lot of what this blogger would have liked to have said, had we been there.
The number of people saying this amongst the ranks of the Labour Party, the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats is... errr... is there anybody?
Nope, because the three main parties are colluding to make any dissenting opinions a thought crime.
And they wonder why people are voting for the BNP..?
Nick Griffin and the BNP as defenders of lives in under-developed and developing nations against avoidable man-made famine..?
The BNP as the party upholding legitimate political democracy and debate against a tide of thought crime and totalitarian fascism..?
Whatever next. The world is upside down.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.