ClimateGate: Miliband throws more labels around at people who won't agree with him (but they aren't listening)

Ed Miliband has decided to launch into full attack on the Conservatives over what people on his side of the debate insist is man-made global warming.

Mini-Miliband recently lowered his office as minister of state into the sewerage when he - of all people - attempted to hysterically brand those with opposing views on climate change to his own as "deniers"; a word that deliberately makes inference to the holocaust and all the more seedy because of it. Such hysterical name calling has become the hallmark of the current leftist way of trying to shut down discussion.

Little wonder people are starting to question any argument that such people try advancing. Want people to stop listening? Try that method of name calling. The British public are not completely stupid all of the time.

Branding the majority of the British public as "deniers" can hardly be a vote winner, either.

Yet personal name-calling seems to be mini-Miliband's forte. Here he goes again.

Speaking of Lord Lawson and David Davis in the context of the forthcoming Copenhagen global government climate change summit in light of their publicly raised question marks, he says: "It is profoundly irresponsible for people like Nigel Lawson, who has held high office, and David Davis to be doing what they are doing. It is very dangerous. People sabotaging the process deserve the name saboteur."

Saboteur. Denier. Any more names you want to throw into the mix? How about Labour's favourite... terrorist? Extremist? Any other labels you'd like to use, Mr. Miliband?

Surely, when a minister of state has to keep on using such emotive and gutter level language, it severely damages the argument even more than a leaked email making reference to hiding the decline...

Still, he can do his damnedest. He might even be able to shut down discussion in police state Britain... but he has no control whatsoever over the American House of Congress.

Here's Michigan's Republican congressional representative Candice Miller urging an American investigation into the University of East Anglia's climate research unit alleging criminal acts - and summarising the behaviour of those like Ed Miliband, too:

Bravo, Ms. Miller.

And she is not a lone voice, either.

Senator Jim Inhofe is also demanding a serious investigation over manipulation of data, the vilification of people with opposing viewpoints and the alleged potentially criminal action:

So, mini-Miliband can call people names all he likes. The lid is off Pandora's Box and he can't intimidate American politicians by calling them names. Thank goodness.

Neither can he intimidate people in Saudi Arabia or order the same devices used to control the British public to act on Saudi soil.

So what does mini-Miliband intend to do about Mohammad Al-Sabban of Saudi Arabia, then?

Al-Sabban tells the BBC that ClimateGate has made his mind up: "It appears from the details of the scandal that there is no relationship whatsoever between human activities and climate change. Climate is changing for thousands of years, but for natural and not human-induced reasons. So, whatever the international community does to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will have no effect on the climate's natural variability," he says.

Seems some people are just out of the reach of attempts to scare, bully and intimidate people into changing their opinions.

Thank goodness we have some people in the world with independent thought.

Gordon Brown and his ilk will just have to find some other pretext for their 'global government' and 'new world order' to be imposed.

No wonder people are cynical about politics and politicians.

Can anybody really believe that a British minister of state would walk around throwing labels around at anyone who disagrees with him in such a manner?

So, to keep up, here's another label for him: 'utter disgrace'.

Meanwhile, columnist Leon de Winter of Elsevier magazine gives a hand to those of us who cannot speak Dutch. He tells how researchers from a government body in the Netherlands have trashed Al Gore's theories about melting snowcaps on Kilimanjaro. The Dutch Organisation of Scientific Research concludes that such melting is part of a natural process and concludes that Al Gore's conclusion that man is to blame is "unfortunate".

And finally (for now), The Washington Times is reporting that NASA may soon find itself under the microscope of the climate change row with threats of legal action for the release of data being discussed.