The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.

"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."

Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Could Conservative's new 'Green Bank' proposal send thousands more Tories to UKIP?

The Daily Telegraph reports that Lord Stern is to head a Conservative Party vision of a "green bank" which will "help create the Conservative vision of a bank designed to channel public and private money into funding green business plans and technologies".

The newspaper helpfully provides a background link to a report from October 2006, outlining Stern's role in influencing Labour's 'man made global warming' turned 'climate change' policies on "green taxes on cars, fuel, air travel and consumer electronics to curb pollution and avert a looming global catastrophe caused by climate change".

The same archive report reminds us that "Al Gore, the former US vice-president and a leading advocate of tackling climate change, [had] agreed to act as [Gordon Brown's] adviser" on such issues.

In response to the 2006 Stern Report, it was reported that Gordon Brown would "call for a global carbon market, and promise to set targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a new climate change Bill."

This weekend, the Sunday Telegraph reported that the Stern Report "was changed after being published". The report accused the Stern Report of having similar problems as the IPCC's dodgy dossier. It claimed: "Information was quietly removed from an influential government report on the cost of climate change after its initial publication because supporting scientific evidence could not be found".

If comments on Lord Tebbit's most recent blog are any gauge, a lot of traditional Conservative supporters - already angry at David Cameron and the Conservative Party's broken promises and rhetoric concerning the European Union - are also uncomfortable with Cameron's leadership sailing wholeheartedly into the green lobby.

Many of those posting on Lord Tebbit's blog are identifying themselves as traditional Conservative voters who are vowing to vote for UKIP until the Conservative Party returns to more traditional Conservative policies.

Lord Tebbit writes: "I am not daft enough to think that those who post comments on this site (especially in the small hours of the morning) constitute a statistically accurate sample of the electorate, but I hope that Camp Cameron’s patrols pay us a visit now and again."

UKIP, meanwhile, have recently been joined by Lord Monckton - the man who flagged to a global audience most of the flaws in the IPCC report on 'man made global warming' turned 'climate change' several months before the current onslaught of humiliating stories for the IPCC on it's unscientific claims.

Monckton claimed that a proposed draft treaty for discussion at Copenhagen was really using the pretext of 'man made global warming' to set up a global government.

UKIP MEP Godfrey Bloom recently attacked many behind some of the worst scaremonger climate stories as 'crooks' - famously dubbing Al Gore as a 'snake oil salesman'.

- Are you a "traditional Conservative" voter? Do you support a "green bank" and "climate change" policies? Let us know!

UPDATE: Posters on Guido seem somewhat unimpressed...

0 comments:

Post a Comment

This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.