The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.

"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."

Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution

Monday, 27 September 2010

Should Bilderberg members be barred from the UK Parliament?

With James Delingpole and the Daily Telegraph providing a link to the official Bilderberg website, here's our second post on that matter today.

The Bilderberg website clearly states that EU-loving Conservative MP Ken Clarke - now Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice - is on the Bilderberg Steering Committee.

It also clearly states that Baroness Shirley Williams (Lib Dem) and crossbencher Lord Kerr (listed as John Kerr of Royal Dutch Shell) were just two of the people from the United Kingdom to attend the Bilderberg Conference in Sitges, Spain earlier this year.

Well now, we need to have some fun with this.

We need to put in official requests for information to find out if they were attending in a private capacity or in their role as Members of the House of Lords.

They are listed as members of the House of Lords, so surely we have a right to know what they were doing there?

Surely we have a right to know what was discussed?

Surely we have a right to see the minutes?

Surely we have a right to know whether the taxpayer financed any aspect of their attendance?

Surely we need to know whether anything discussed has an impact on any part of United Kingdom government policy?

And, surely, we need to consider whether attendance of the Bilderberg Conference constitutes a conflict of interest which should cause one to be barred from entering the precincts of the Houses of Parliament?

There's the ball rolling for you - over to you to have more fun with this official disclosure...

1 comments:

  1. You're not the first to ask and most certainly won't be the last TC. It's been done many times. Chatham House rules apply in much that involves the running of the UK in the UK, which in itself is completely against the liberty that should be followed by politicians, that is servants of the people.

    Then again, considering that the UK is run from Europe it really wouldn't make any difference whatsoever whether British politicians/lords attended Bilderberger meetings.

    I'd like to see no politician with a communist history in parliament. I'd like to see no freemasons near Parliament. I'd like to see no royalty or secret society members within 100 miles of Parliament. I'd like to see no corporation lobbies, Zionist lobbies or any lobbies for that matter controlling parliament. I'd like to see a parliament run by the people, for the people, but I'm only wishful thinking.

    The only thing that will bring about the above most natural and libertarian of parliament runnings will be complete and utter chaos when every man and woman within the UK hits rock bottom, revolts and casts out the corruption prevalent within Parliament and every other establishment within the UK (and west for that matter).

    James Delingpole may be waking up. This can only be seen as a good thing, but far too many journalits are socialist leaning lefties who are happy to live within a socialist society as long as they drink the champagne and are just a little bit higher up the ladder than all the rest.

    It'll be a cold day in hell before any Bilderberger is not allowed to attend Parliament.

    ReplyDelete

This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.