The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.

"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."

Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution

Saturday, 20 November 2010

Sorry Charlie Boy, I will NEVER accept the 'Rottweiler' woman as Queen

Apparently, Her Majesty The Queen might be a little bit internet savvy.

If she is and she passes by this blog... please can you ensure that the throne skips a generation and goes to the Prince with the ability to unite both traditional Royalists... and those of us who worship at the temple of Diana, Princess of Wales?

Yes, we're advocating that William become King.

And we're hoping that Prince Charles takes 'that woman' and lives happily ever after in peaceful Cotswold bliss.

He's on the TV - apparently - and in the papers saying that he thinks it's possible that his wife might become Queen...

...his wife, of course, being someone now referred to in legend by Diana as 'the rottweiler'.

A woman who was always part of Charles' life, before, during and after 'they' took a nineteen year old girl, used her and abused her, and ditched her as soon as she'd produced a heir and a spare.

That she transformed into a goddess of humanitarian compassion was a minor miracle.

That she was then unlawfully killed in a Parisian tunnel is one of the greatest crimes and tragedies of the twentieth century.

Diana's son as King - yes.

Diana's nemesis as Queen? Have her if you must. But I won't accept it. Not ever.

I will not be able to accept a monarchy with that woman at it's head... not after what was done to the eternally beautiful Diana.

And anyway... wasn't one of the conditions of Charles' marriage to *that* woman - a constitutional no-go - that she would never be Queen?

So the public were hoodwinked again? There's a surprise.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.