The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.

"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."

Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution

Sunday, 28 February 2010

So, is Cam the man..?

We're posting this, after some deliberation. Obviously, this blog would love it if 50% of the electorate were to vote for UKIP.

BUT, if you really cannot and will not bring yourself to give UKIP your vote, then give it to Cameron.

Where we do agree with Cameron is that Gordon Brown and Labour must be removed.

That anyone would still want to vote for Labour is completely baffling. After all we've been through together, 35% of you would still vote for the Labour Party?

Is that really what the state of the country's education and deeply entrenched tribalism has come to?

Please, have mercy upon us.




P.S. Really crap speech, Cam. Sorry and all that. But that was dire.

Sunday Paper Review: 28th February 2010

No denials yet this week, Gordon? Only, The Mail on Sunday has produced detail of an extraordinary audio recording - made available for all to listen to on their website - in which senior foreign policy adviser Dr Stewart Wood candidly talks about Gordon Brown, the alleged bully. The recording forms part of the research by "pro-Labour journalist" Suzie Mackenzie for a book and appears to substantiate some of the tone of the claims made by Andrew Rawnsley and part-serialised in last week's Observer newspaper. The report ends by noting a statement from Wood, issued last night, dismissing the way the recording is being presented - but not before taking a quote from Andrew Rawnsley who says: "It is now clear that it is Gordon Brown who lied, and not me. I look forward to an apology."

There's a huge story in the Sunday Telegraph, by highly respected journalist Andrew Gilligan, which is really going to reverberate for days and weeks. It centres on a joint investigation between the newspaper and Channel Four's Dispatches and claims that the Labour Party "has been infiltrated by a fundamentalist Muslim group that wants to create an “Islamic social and political order” in Britain". The group, the IFE, are described in the newspaper headline as "Islamic radicals" and are publicly criticised by Environment Minister Jim Fitzpatrick. The report details the group's role within Tower Hamlets council. The election of George Galloway is also mentioned in the report. Fitzpatrick is quoted by the newspaper as saying: "They are acting almost as an entryist organisation, placing people within the political parties, recruiting members to those political parties, trying to get individuals selected and elected so they can exercise political influence and power, whether it’s at local government level or national level". This story is going to be huge, one suspects.

The Independent on Sunday suggests that the "right" of the Conservative Party is starting to exert it's muscle and influencing a commitment for tax cuts should the Conservatives win the next General Election. The story reports that Dan Hannan's 'Tea Party' event was one of the most popular amongst party supporters in Brighton yesterday.

What the report doesn't say is that a huge number of potential Conservative voters do not think the party is sounding anywhere near 'right' wing enough in their agenda, anyway. 'Right'-wing of course, being a term designed to reinforce a pile of old tribal nonsense, rather than voting on the best policies for Britain.

The Conservatives need to do something to win back their core vote - as the News of the World reports on a YouGov poll for... ummm.... the Sunday Times which shows that the Conservatives lead in the polls is now down to just TWO points.

If Gordon Brown wins the next election, will the last person to leave Britain please turn off the lights, lest the climate change alarmists get their knickers in a twist...

Back to Gordon Brown, and the Sunday Express is flagging up concerns that Gordon Brown may have misled the nation over the number of troops being deployed in Afghanistan. It says that when the unelected PM announced 500 more troops for the frontline, the battalion supposedly being sent as a reinforcing unit was already scheduled to go to Afghanistan anyway.

In The Observer, there's more from Andrew Rawnsley's book about behind doors life of the Labour Government. Today's revelations centre on the despair and depression that descended over Tony Blair after the Iraq war.

The Sunday Times reveals that the current crop of MPs - who the newspaper helpfully reminds us have been 'disgraced' over the expenses scandal - will be able to access the House of Commons even after we boot them out, after a change brought in by previous Speaker Michael Martin. The newspaper suggests that this will make them prime candidates for the employ of lobbying organisations.

Saturday, 27 February 2010

ClimateGate university in yet more controversy

The Times is reporting that the University of East Anglia - home to the controversial CRU at the eye of the ClimateGate scandal - is now accused of having "tried to mislead MPs on climate change e-mails".

The report asserts that the University tried to suggest that the Information Commissioner's Office had exonerated the acadamic institute of wrongdoing over freedom of information requests.

However, a letter from the ICO actually stated: "The prima facie evidence from the published e-mails indicate an attempt to defeat disclosure by deleting information. It is hard to imagine more cogent prima facie evidence".

The Information Commissioner's Office has supplied it's original correspondence to Parliament's Science and Technology Committee who are holding an inquiry into the ClimateGate scandal.

They're not doing themselves any favours at the UEA, huh?

Quite what the Westminster Warmists will make of it all is anybody's guess.

Many members of the public may rightly believe that we have been misled by our politicians about 'man made global warming' turned 'climate change' turned 'CO2 pollution' - as well as being misled by scientists.

We'll leave you with a couple of sentences from a highly relevant book to consider:
"Too much of the information we are given turns out to be beliefs or hypotheses dressed up as fact. When 'everybody knows' something it's time to challenge it; the 'scientists believe' phenomenon, especially when supported by statements such as 'new research has shown', should always arouse suspicion. The use of emotive, often pejorative, terms such as 'will cause the end of the world', 'will kill hundreds of thousands' and 'time is running out' should alert readers to the probability that they are being mentally bullied and manipulated. It should warn them of the need to examine the evidence carefully to see whether the case is indeed proven 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
FELDMAN, Stanley 'Introduction' in FELDMAN, Stanley and MARKS, Vincent (Eds.) Global Warming and Other Bollocks (London: Blake, 2009), p. xxii


Friday, 26 February 2010

Man-of-the-moment Nigel Farage: Joyfully Unrepentant (updated with full video and audio clips)

Nigel Farage has defiantly stood by all of his words from when he berated the European Empire's Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy earlier this week.

Speaking to globally popular U.S. broadcaster Alex Jones today, the ever brilliant Nigel stated that:

- He will not apologise to Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy or anyone else and they can suspend him from the EU Parliament if they want to.

- The European Empire is the "absolute destruction" of democracy.

- Analysis of von Rumpy-Pumpy's drive towards global government.

- UKIP believes in liberty and freedom of the individual.




A complete MP3 audio file to download for free is also online at Alex's website. Click HERE.

Don't be conned folks, says Telegraph's economic editor

Edmund Conway of The Telegraph has written a fascinating article on the revised ONS figures on the economy. His analysis shows something very different from the 'feel-good vibe' headline you've probably seen on TV news reports.

Worth reading.

See also: 'Imminent pound collapse warning withdrawn'

Quotes of the Week

"Biofuels are driving a global human tragedy. Local food prices have already risen massively. As biofuel production gains pace, this can only accelerate."
- Action Aid report author Tim Rice warns of the spectre of global starvation caused by environment policies as 'EU biofuels 10% targets cause millions of peope to go hungry and increase food prices and landlessness', as reported in The Guardian. The full report is available HERE (pdf format).

"I would like to answer any question on ACTA, but the thing is I can't. I'm just an elected Parliamentarian. I'm not allowed to know anything about it. This will be presented to Parliament and to the citizens as a fait accompli...The Commission refuses to give us any information."
- Swedish Pirate Party MEP Christian Engström on the European Empire's 'Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement' at an Open Europe event asking: "Is the EU a threat to civil liberties?".

Celebrating 'Little Englanders' and a 'working class hero'

"We may be proud that England is the ancient country of Parliaments. With scarcely any intervening period, Parliaments have met constantly for 600 years, and there was something of a Parliament before the Conquest. England is the mother of Parliaments." - John Bright

Just sitting down researching some source material for an article I want to write on the term 'Little Englander'.

I can tell you already that the article I'm researching will be a reclaiming article - one where being a 'Little Englander' is something to be proud of rather than a fair phrase of insult.

The given definition of the term is as follows:
"someone who thinks that people in England should concentrate on English affairs and that foreign countries should not be allowed to influence what happens in England."
Nothing in that which offends me... all sounds rather sensible.

So, just roaming through a few articles on 19th century politics - and at this juncture, I'll break away from anticipating that which is not yet written.

I was most interested to find that, in late-2008, the Conservative MPs Bill Cash and Richard Shepherd were to visit Birmingham together to pay tribute to and make celebration of the radical politician John Bright.

As Bill Cash explains: "[John Bright] was the author of modern democracy and parliamentary reform, now undermined by our subservience to domination by European legislation and the refusal of a Referendum and the unbridled irresponsible use of the whip system in every nook and cranny of the palace of Westminster. He would never have tolerated any of this."

That Bill Cash and Richard Shepherd should have wished to honour John Bright does not come as any great surprise. Those who read Hansard or who watch proceedings in Parliament on TV or over the internet will note that both Cash and Shepherd are incredible orators; both understand the important part of our Parliament; both have very important things to say about democracy.

When I have the pleasure of listening to Bill Cash or Richard Shepherd speak - two great Statesmen for whom I would not hesitate in voting - I feel very strongly that, while I may not agree with them on everything and nor should I feel that I may, they do appreciate those very great concerns that a humble and frustrated member of the public feels about having no democratic voice while an overbearing State increasingly oppresses free speech and liberty.

In that, one must look to the reforms that John Bright was instrumental in bringing about.

Perhaps the most important is summarised by The Stirrer, which notes:
"He successfully campaigned to extend the vote to skilled working men in towns. In the middle of the 19th Century only a limited number of men (and no women) had the vote. John Bright wanted all men to vote because only in this way did he feel that we would get a government which was responsive to the needs and wishes of the people. The result was the Reform Act of 1867 passed by Disraeli which gave the vote to skilled working men in the towns."
That the circle has turned should be a cause for concern. And in that, a period of 'Little Englander' mentality - sorting out our own house - might be a very sensible thing indeed.

An Inconvenient Ban on Al Gore films in our schools

UKIP's climate policies are making headlines over at the Telegraph.

As various indoctrinations of our children become an increasing concern, UKIP have vowed to ban the Al Gore 'propaganda' film An Inconvenient Truth from British schools.

UKIP is promising a Royal Commission headed by a High Court judge to investigate man's impact on the climate.

They also vow to cease funding of the controversy-mired IPCC and to withdraw from the EU's 'carbon trading' scheme.

Lord Monckton is quoted in the Telegraph as welcoming to UKIP all those people who do not buy into the 'man made global warming' turned 'climate change' turned 'CO2 pollution' agenda, saying: "At the moment all the major parties have decided to sign up to the eco-fascist agenda and therefore anyone who does not believe in eco-fascist agenda has no where else to go."

UPDATED: See also UKIP website for further detail.

Any 'British Tea Party' needs Ron Paul's spirit to stir it

As Dan Hannan, a man we admire incredibly, prepares to launch the 'British Tea Party' movement this weekend, we wanted to express a few thoughts on what the U.S. 'tea party' is - and was.

We say this having noted the Freedom Association using the 'Taxed Enough Already' slogan which is the prominent slogan now being used in the U.S.

However, before rushing to judgment on something that hasn't even launched yet, we wanted to remind all involved of the roots of the 'tea party' movement.

It is evident that the 'tea party' movement in the U.S. no longer bears much resemblance to it's very recent origins.

Fellow listeners of the Alex Jones show will be aware of the recent developments that have changed the direction of the original movement. Alex Jones contends it has been deliberately subverted.

The 'tea party' movement was never centred around Sarah Palin.

The origins were based around protecting civil liberties, upholding the Constitution, opposing tyranny, arguing against 'big' government, arguing against controversial foreign policy.

And in that, the 'tea party' movement threw it's support behind U.S. congressman Ron Paul.

This blogger would definitely support a 'tea party' movement.

But we'll only drink the brand of 'tea' that is made by Ron Paul.

'Taxed enough already' doesn't sound tasty enough to drink.

Produce the Ron Paul brand of tea in Britain, we'll drink it morning, noon and night.

Now, in and amongst these reservations, we can say that we KNOW that Dan Hannan admires and supports Ron Paul. If Dan Hannan could replicate the Ron Paul message here in Britain, on British soil rather than the European Empire stage, then we might just yet find a national saviour...

But first, he and his supporters needs to read OUR constitution - as enshrined in the Bill of Rights 1688.

It is a myth that we do not have a written constitution, and we the people have not consented to the surrender of it to the European Empire.

Britain needs to be led by a similar Constitutional champion as Ron Paul is in the States - a champion with liberty and with the will of we, the people in their heart.

The British history books and the Bill of Rights 1688 must be the starting point - not the tax office.




The week in review (26/02)

These are the ten blog posts which have been viewed most here on The Talking Clock over the last seven days.

NTW = New This Week

(1) 1. Lord Monckton - on Alex Jones (Jan)
(-) 2. Smoking Ban MPs - the choice deniers NTW
(2) 3. Lisbon Treaty - the referendum deniers
(6) 4. Lord Monckton - on Alex Jones (Feb)
(-) 5. Nigel Farage - finally making BBC News NTW
(-) 6. Lord Tebbit - admits attending Bilderberg NTW
(-) 7. Vanessa Crichton - our exclusive interview NTW
(-) 8. Immigration-gate - Labour calls us all racist NTW
(-) 9. Valentine Smith - our exclusive interview NTW
(4) 10. Jasna Badzak - our exclusive interview

Our favourite seven blog posts or articles seen elsewhere this week:

1. Cold Steel Rain - pre-emptive sex-education (adult language)
2. Lord Tebbit - encountering Chinese dragons
3. Dick Puddlecote - writes to the Belgians
4. Lord Monckton - replies to a 'warmist' letter
5. Iain Dale - paying for climate indoctrination
6. James Delingpole - on not being scum
7. Marcellus - Britain, the zombie nation

Thank you to those who've read, positively linked to, or posted comments on The Talking Clock over the last seven days.

Thursday, 25 February 2010

BBC Question Time: English and 'offended'...

As the way to repress free speech seems to be to run around squealing "I'm offended" all over the place, as an Englishman, I would like to declare "I'm offended".

Having just sat through BBC Question Time which, most of us will know, audiences are invited to after being asked about their political affiliations prior to the filming of, a couple of thoughts.

Did you notice the rampant hypocrisy amongst the panellists?

Whilst calling Nigel Farage a whole host of names - including the borderline 'racist' derogatory term "Little Englander" (Elfyn Llwyd) - there were a whole host of other 'insults'.

Later, Llwyd went on to say that those believing in 'creationism' are 'barmy'. Now, this blogger is not a Christian. But we'd imagine an awfully large number of Christians all around the world were or would be very offended by that remark.

Janet Street-Porter used a whole string of derogatory adjectives to describe everybody from Ed Balls to Chelsea defender John Terry. She also made a comment that was borderline sexist - against men, obviously.

And then we had the member of the Cardiff studio audience who announced that they wanted England to be defeated in the first round of the football World Cup.

Following reports of the sale in Scotland of T-shirts carrying slogans hoping that the football World Cup would be won by anyone but England, it's nice to know we're amongst friends in the United Kingdom...

But let's put all of that aside for one moment. We in England are quite used to taking it on the chin.

What we should REALLY be being told is why, at the last minute last week, Nigel Farage's appearance on Question Time was suddenly cancelled.

As you may remember, the show last week was transmitted from Middlesbrough.

Nigel Farage may well have had a thing or ten to say about the closure of a certain steel plant.

Nigel Farage may well wanted to have spoken about the export of British jobs to India.

Nigel Farage may well have wanted to speak about carbon trading scams and the role they play in the closure of certain steel works in the North East.

But no, at the last minute, his appearance intended for last week was cancelled.

Any chance of an official reason, BBC? Or shall we just accept what James Delingpole had to report on the matter?

The follow-on programme to Question Time - the often far more enlightening This Week - has just begun. In more measured tones, Michael Portillo made Nigel's EU speech his 'moment of the week'. He did so, noting the publicity that Nigel had given to the fact that Emperor van Rumpy-Pumpy is NOT elected into his job by anyone and is paid more than President Obama.

If the left-wing claptrap and hypocrisy that is Question Time doesn't want to engage, but instead wants to be anti-English, then the English should just consider their support, or lack of, for the 'telly tax' masquerading as a 'TV license'.

Update: Did this edition of Question Time backfire on the BBC? We're seeing a fair number of people coming to this blog after searching for 'biased audience' or similar. Interesting.

Nigel Farage speaks for the voiceless majority: The full five minutes

Here's the full five minute clip of Nigel Farage giving a storming performance in the belly of the beast that is the European Empire yesterday.

If you've got that 50 second clip on your blog, update and put this one up - it's funny how a short clip can distort the context.

You'll note in this clip, references to Belgium were not objected to. Nor were references to bank clerks. The line that upset everyone was the comparison to a 'damp rag'. Oooh.

And in this clip, you'll be reminded by Nigel Farage that the insults are normally dished out to those opposed to the European Empire project:


...you tell 'em, Nigel!

It's the economy, stupid - as rows bubble up all over the planet

As Labour's Frank Field - one of the few Labour MP's to maintain a high degree of popularity across the political spectrum - echoes a recent warning by U.S. senator Ron Paul and warns of the prospect of "serious, serious unrest on our streets", there seems to be serious unrest across the whole of Europe.

Some of it is a war of words and rhetoric - some of it much more concerning.

While the BBC took the rare decision to put UKIP's Nigel Farage into the news headlines after his outspoken attack on Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy - which also upset some people in Belgium - our state broadcaster made little of comments by a Labour MP.

After three Google executives were convicted of violating privacy laws in Italy - a ruling which they plan to appeal and which is being viewed as a serious threat to the internet - Tom Watson told the media: "This is the biggest threat to internet freedom we have seen in Europe. The only people who will support this decision are Silvio Berlusconi and the governments of China and Iran. It effectively breaks the internet in Italy."

While we agree with Watson on the possible prospect of a further assault on internet free-speech, if you analyse his words, Watson does equate Berlusconi with the governments of China and Iran...

Is that any more or less controversial than describing Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy as looking like a clapped out bank clerk? Or poking the fun out of Belgium? You decide.

Meanwhile, the Deputy Prime Minister of Greece - Theodore Pangalos - has trumped the entire lot. He has made mild comments about Italy and the management of their economy... before turning his attention to Germany and making accusations of Nazi looting.

"They took away the Greek gold that was at the Bank of Greece, they took away the Greek money and they never gave it back. This is an issue that has to be faced sometime. I don't think they have to give back the money necessarily but they have at least to say 'thanks'. And they shouldn't complain so much about stealing and not being very specific about economic dealings," he told the BBC.

Meanwhile, a German magazine used an image of the Venus de Milo to accuse Greece of being what the UK media is translating as "swindlers in the Eurozone".

Away from European wars of words, U.S. President Obama might come in for criticism from the UK after apparently refusing to back Britain as a row with Argentina over sovereignty of the Falklands bubbles away neatly under the surface.

This is a new row, in case you've been sleeping. You haven't entered a time machine and stepped back to the 1980's. This is still 2010.

Better not mention Iraq and Afghanistan at this juncture.

We're heading to hell in a handcart folks - call that a conspiracy theory, if you dare. Just connecting the dots...

Hope that depressing summary of world events hasn't put you off your cornflakes.

Meanwhile, back in Downing Street, the Labour lot continue to fight amongst themselves in private and deny everything in public. Sweet!

See also:
We're in crisis says Labour veteran
Greek rescue in danger as deputy prime minister attacks 'Nazi' Germany
Clashes in Greece strike against austerity plan
Thousands strike in Greece over austerity plans
Argentina asks UN to bring UK into talks on Falklands

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

£200 million: how much the swine flu scandal is costing UK taxpayers

The Daily Express reports that the overhyped and hysterical swine flu non-pandemic is needlessly costing the British taxpayer £200 million...

...after some idiot forgot to put cancellation clauses into the contracts with Big Pharma.

After the banks were bailed out for billions upon billions, £200 million sounds like a drop in the ocean... inconsequential.

But think about it. You'd have to win the UK's Saturday National Lottery draw every single week for a year to amass that amount (52 weeks @ £4 mill = £208 million).

That is a staggering amount of money.

An amount of money we're gifting to Big Pharma due to incompetence (?) for a health crisis that was all hype and no substance.

Outrageous.

Wow! The BBC put Nigel Farage on the news! Voluntarily...

Don't know whether it's going out on all news platforms, but...

... at 17:25 today, in the traditional 'And finally...' slot, the BBC News channel carried footage of UKIP's Nigel Farage giving the European Empire's Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy another moment of what for.

Actually, he was asking what Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy was there for, as well as telling the undemocratic organisation's figurehead what he thought of him.

...and then he likened his appearance to that of a clapped out bank clerk, or something. Cheeky!

A large slice of the British people no doubt cheered Nigel Farage on, though we suspect the BBC wanted us to tut-tut and disapprove.

We'll watch the UKIP outlets for a clip over the next day or two. If you don't want to wait, you can see the clip on Wideshut.co.uk.

Beyond the extract grabbing the headlines, however, Farage described Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy as 'capable' and 'dangerous' - as someone opposed to democracy and opposed to nation states.

Meanwhile, when UKIP's William Dartmouth MEP asked whether the European Empire wanted non-Eurozone countries to bail-out Greece, the answer he got was...

...that the European Empire expects it might have to bail-out Britain!


...can anyone think of a New Labour / European Empire conspiracy theory that fits what you've just heard..?

In other European Empire related news, the Daily Express reports today that a European ruling is set to turn Britain into a "sponger's heaven".

See also: Meet the President of Europe

Gordon denies 'unleashing the forces of Hell' against Darling

Gordon Brown has denied ordering his henchmen to start 'unleashing the forces of Hell' against Alistair Darling after the Chancellor warned about the state of the economy in 2008.

And the top henchman is denying it, too.

Oh, come on.

This is Alistair Darling who has said what he went through.

He can hardly be accused of being engaged in dark, party politics now, can he?

Not unless he's gone all kamikaze.

No matter what one might think of Darling, he always comes across as a centred individual - not the kind you would associate with bizarre and ungrounded outbursts. In fact, he always comes across as being very in control of his emotions.

Meanwhile, the party that was swept to power accompanied by the sounds of D:Ream's anthem 'Things Can Only Get Better' could consider using Shaggy's 'It Wasn't Me' as their campaign song this year. Perhaps. We're just trying to be helpful...

Tuesday, 23 February 2010

A little time with... UKIP's Hereford and South Herefordshire PPC, Valentine Smith (A 'Talking Clock' exclusive interview)

When UKIP's Valentine Smith, PPC for Hereford & South Herefordshire, wandered past the clock tower recently, we grabbed him by the lapels, screamed abuse at him and bullied him into answering a few questions for us.

Okay, we did no such thing. We'd be too scared to act like that... just in case someone phoned a helpline about us. So, we didn't engage in any bullying. We just asked nicely.

Funny how people are so very kind when you ask nicely, huh?

Moving on from topical satire before we get into too much trouble, here's the interview...

--


Welcome to The Talking Clock, Valentine.

Now, we like to start and end with a nice, gentle bit of light-hearted banter. And we couldn't help noticing that you're not named 'Bob' or 'Frank' or 'Phil'. Go on... is there a story behind how your parents chose such a uniquely romantic name for you?

Inadvertently you have started off with an opportunity to get a real exclusive. I have been keeping this close to my chest, but decided to come clean about it only last week. My name comes from my background; I am part Romany, basically my father’s family... so another ethnic minority candidate for UKIP! It’s a tradition for boys born on St Valentine’s Day, as I was, to be called Valentine.

You read it here first, folks!

Now, the area you are hoping to represent is noted - amongst other things - for apple, pear and strawberry growing... and for the production of a rather well known brand of cider. What are the issues facing local people in those businesses? We're guessing you might have to talk about the European Empire's 'Common Agricultural Policy' a lot?

We had a really good hustings event at the end of last year, hosted by the NFU. All the candidates were there and we had a real grilling. We also set up a stall last year at a major country fair at the end of the summer and again, I was very pleased that - as food production and ecology are amongst my specialities - people demand knowledgeable answers. In each case, as you get the message over of our policy of a slow withdrawal from the CAP and the associated grants, and of UKIP's determination for the UK to fund UK farming and fishing - determined by need and with minimal waste - it an easy concept to sell.

What are the other issues that local people raise with you and how might UKIP be the best party to represent them?

It’s pleasing that the people I talk to, apart from the ever present moans concerning the Government and the mistrust of Cameron, always find time to get onto real local issues. Two hot issues are the ESG development and of course Post Office closures. And this is where I really do struggle with the hypocrisy of politics.

ESG is a huge planned town centre development, wiping away many local businesses, causing traffic chaos, pollution and supplying - as far as we can see - just the same array of major chains that we see everywhere else. And we all know about Post Office closures. However, we have all four candidates all saying exactly the same thing - that they oppose the development and the closures. Now I know I am telling the truth and most likely the Green candidate is, but as for the others..? This type of development and foreign sell off behind the closures is just exactly what their parties have done for years. They are whipped in and, in power, their opposition to these two items would disappear.

Staying with local concerns, you describe yourself as a dedicated supporter of 'Local Is Best'. Tell us a little more about that and why it's something that stirs your passions...

It always raises eyebrows but I am a very 'green' member of the party and, to me, local food production, local government and genuinely local community action is the way forward - and very UKIP. It gives power to communities, is efficient, gives responsibility and reduces pollution. Far better for the environment than any amount of wind farms... and please don’t get me started on carbon trading!

Don't worry, we won't. We are secretly hoping that someone high up in UKIP might notice our continuing support of Lord Monckton and might offer him up for a natter with us - so we'll keep those carbon trading issues quiet until then!

Moving on, we've got the results of the European Elections 2009 in front of us. UKIP did very well indeed - second place with 23.9% in Herefordshire, behind the Conservatives and easily beating the Liberal Democrats. Do you expect to be able to come anywhere near that brilliant result for the party at a General Election? Or do we more realistically need to look to the constituency result at the 2005 General Election where UKIP polled a somewhat more modest 2.2%..?

It’s a matter of time and resources. Cameron’s volte face on the referendum has really been a catalyst. So many Conservative voters are fuming and I am trying to meet as many as I can to convince them of our alternative. Once you give people the reasons why a UKIP vote is not a wasted vote, you get them on side. If the Conservatives or any other party do get the seat, they will have bought it, not won it.

Your constituency is very high on the list of targets for the Conservatives. Now, David Cameron has form for saying some very disparaging things about UKIP. Where do you think the balance is going to be between positive and negative campaigning at this year's General Election? And are you prepared for the latter?

Professionally I am from a Public Relations background, (yup a spin doctor) and I actually want it to get a little personal and the reason is that I am coming to the table with a clear truthful message. Some of the others have so much baggage and hypocrisy as part of what they present that I am more than happy to expose it. Let us take the Conservative candidate in my constituency - a decent bloke, but when you consider the ridiculous, patronising short lists the Tories are promoting (and remember my ethnic background), our [local Conservative] candidate is just an identikit one of ‘Dave’s Mates’; an ex-banker, male, white, middle class... They haven’t changed, they never will.

Now on the subject of negative campaigning, we couldn't help but notice that the current MP, Paul Keetch (Lib Dem), abstained on the House of Commons vote that would have given the British people a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Even though he's standing down, is that little fact going into your campaign literature?

If you have any concerns about the EU and the direction it’s taking, you simply can’t vote Lib Dem or Labour. And any faith voters may have had in the Conservatives has been blown out of the water. It is our biggest vote winner at present. Although I must admit as a long term [UKIP supporter], I get more personal pleasure from the delight people show as we advertise the broader manifesto.

Those who are cynical about UKIP might say that it is in the party’s interests to remain part of the European Empire – they may well assert that if Britain were to withdraw from the EU tomorrow, the party might no longer have any people feeling the need to vote for it. We know that some might say that... because we’ve read such a comment. What would you say to people who might come out with that one?

It’s the old literal turkey, why should we vote for Christmas? Really, if we have won the EU argument, it follows that people will buy in to the rest of our manifesto and will want us to remain in UK politics. Our policies are so much commonsense and workable - and yes, radical - that they deserve to be part of how the UK moves forward, post-EU.

Picking up on the latter part of that, UKIP has been quite unique in highlighting the plight of British pubs. How are local pubs doing in your constituency? Why do you think UKIP have made an issue of supporting the British pub? And what role does the British pub serve in more rural communities?

This touches base with so many UKIP issues. Again, there’s the need for local facilities to be supported. [We have] concerns about the ‘Pubcos’ that put far too many landlords in a position of not being able to run their businesses properly. And then there's our old friend, ‘tradition’. [British pubs] are unique, we like them, visitors like them and, allowed to be run correctly, they provide an excellent range of services.

Looking at national current affairs for a moment, at the beginning of the year, New Labour announced it would rush 'naked body scanners' into airports. And now this week, we see another credible report in the Telegraph on the development of civilian spy drones to patrol the people of Britain. This is part of an ever-increasing trend but it's all going a bit too far and becoming ever so slightly scary now, don't you think? What on earth is going on?

Aware that in this interview I have directed my fire at the Tories - because I need people to know that they are not worthy of our votes - I shall use this answer to hit Labour where they deserve it. I didn’t vote Blair in ’97 and, after what I see as the complete disintegration of so much of our society, I simply can’t see why anyone now would. It’s basically just tribal. If it were not so serious it would amuse me to see how many left wing commentators desperately try to justify the Iraq/Afghanistan wars, when they really must loathe the situation.

And to answer your question it’s all part of the same downgrading of our society, forced upon us by an over dependence on state control - both as part of the New Labour culture and by the lack of a firm but fair, progressive relationship with the Islamic world.

Winding down from such searching questions, here's an easier chance for you to sell the party. Which one UKIP policy area that we haven't discussed yet interests you most? What would you like to tell us about UKIP's policy in that regard?

Two main points here. Firstly - and as I am at a hustings meeting at a sixth form college next week it’s vitally important - I feel this election will start to show the end of the old two party system. Basically most voters have no real enthusiasm for any of the three old parties and I am almost begging people to vote with their heart, for what they believe in, not just for who they think will get the most seats.

Secondly, our tax and social security plans. Quite frankly they are so well thought out and structured to cure so many of the old fiscal problems we have, that I want absolutely everyone to read them, it’s a real vote winner.

And finally... we're pretty sure you've never chatted to a clock before - in just the same way as we've never chatted to a Valentine. So, at the risk of being corny and with the promise that we'll keep your answer a secret (bar those who read what you say on the internet, obviously)... if Cupid could shoot an arrow at any famous celebrity for you, at whom would you want him to aim?

Phew onto the serious stuff!! Well as my wife could be described as a tall cool blonde, intelligent and committed, it would have to be Joanna Lumley as the more famous version.

Joanna Lumley... how absolutely fabulous is she!? And Phil Woolas no doubt remembers her very well indeed...

Many thanks for your time today, Valentine. Let us know how things go with your campaigning...

Spy drones for Britain and shutting down the internet

Civil liberties concerns are bound to be raised by a report in today's Telegraph which reports on further developments in the plan to introduce spy drones to monitor the public as we go about our law abiding business.

Look at the money involved. Look at the supranational interests involved. Depressingly, we probably have to accept that we will have spy drones observing our every move in a couple of years from now. Doesn't matter whether you like the idea. Just submit and pay your taxes, so we can buy even more control-grid to keep you enslaved in - there's a good sheeple.

Doesn't matter what we think. Doesn't matter what we say. This is what is going to happen and there's probably nothing any of us can do about it.

Meanwhile, Big Brother Watch has news of a development in France that should be of concern to all those who support free speech. Make the most of expressing an opinion on the internet while you've still got it.

Do we even need bothering talking about Orwell anymore? Seems we can all object however much we like. This is the hell we're entering into. Enjoy!

Immigration-gate: We're all racists now (apparently)

A Freedom of Information request on the report Going With The Flow: Managing Migration in the 21st Century is making a big splash with both the Daily Express and the Daily Mail.

Both reports tell the same story.

Redacted sections of the report have now been revealed and they say that British people are only opposed to immigration because we're all racist.

"Recent research shows that anti-immigrant sentiment is closely correlated with racism rather than economic motives," the report says.

Elsewhere, a warning that along with immigration would come more organised crime had also been redacted.

Labour has been accused of deliberately allowing mass immigration for political purposes.

Ministerial advisor Andrew Neather first flagged a political agenda behind Labour's immigration policies last year. His stunning disclosure of deliberate immigration for political ends were still reverberating before the new revelations.

The latest news has even seen the Conservative Party put down it's new found hippy peace-and-love branding and return to Conservative sounding positioning.

Both newspapers today quote Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling, who says of the latest discoveries: "The Government has simply not been telling the truth about its policies on immigration. More and more evidence is now emerging to show that they deliberately planned a big jump in immigration for their own political purposes. Now they are trying to rewrite history to pretend those decisions never happened. Their conduct over all of this has been a complete disgrace."

Well, it's one more thing that Labour is accusing us all of being to add to the list. If you happen to be British be aware that Labour thinks of us all as: terrorists, criminals, paedophiles, sexist, anti-European xenophobes, flat-earthers, climate-change deniers and now racists. Apparently.

Anything else we've all been accused of that we're missing off the list?

Dunno about you, but I'm starting to feel bullied into accepting a political ideology through brainwashing.

"Repeat what we tell you to say, think what we tell you to think, else we will brand you with a label and cart you off to a third-world enclave and subject you to torture! Do it now, comrade!"

Really... it's beyond compare all this.

Actually, isn't accusing all British folk of being racist somewhat... errr... racist?

Just to prove that I'm not racist, how about I finally lose patience and say something really controversial..?

Have you given a British passport to Mohamed Al Fayed yet? He deserves it. He employs thousands, generates a fortune for the economy and works tirelessly for charity. So give the man a British passport. He's VERY welcome in this country as far as this blogger is concerned. Oh, but he's not worthy of a British passport... because he knows his own opinions and ain't scared to express them?

Dear, dear. I've read some things in my time, but few have made me as angry as being accused of being racist just because I'm British. Go away, Labour!

Monday, 22 February 2010

A little time with... UKIP's Hammersmith PPC, Vanessa Crichton (A 'Talking Clock' exclusive interview)

Following our recent exclusive interview with UKIP's Westminster North PPC Jasna Badzak, we're delighted to welcome a second UKIP PPC to The Talking Clock. So, come join us on the sofa as we have a good old natter over tea and biscuits with the lovely Vanessa Crichton.

Vanessa Crichton is the UKIP PPC for Hammersmith. It's a constituency that has been, in this case, 'revived' through recent boundary changes. Theoretically, the incumbent MP is moving to fight a 'next door' seat and another serving Labour MP - currently representing Ealing, Acton & Shepherd's Bush - is partially side-stepping in to fight for this seat. It's a complex local picture that has the political pundits debating likely outcomes at length.

Vanessa is also the Chairman of UKIP West London.

--



Welcome to The Talking Clock, Vanessa...

Hello and thank you for giving me the opportunity to talk to you.

1. Now, before we get down to our main questions, we have to mention having seen a recent email from you. At the end of that email, you sign off 'Chairman, UKIP West London'. Hatty Harperson is not going to like you describing yourself as a 'Chairman', is she? Aren't you supposed to be describing yourself as a 'Chairwoman of the Divine Sisterhood' or something, now?

Yes, I do describe myself as “chairman”. I don’t like this politically correct mangling of our language. Mankind describes all human beings and therefore chairman describes the position of someone who is at the head of an organisation. I have never been a feminist; men and women have their roles in life and I pride myself on doing my role to the best of my ability.

2. So, what does the 'Chairman of UKIP West London' do in her role?

UKIP West London was set up in September 2007 and membership has been growing steadily over the last 2 years. We have monthly meetings in a pub to keep members informed and to have a drink or two! I also send out information on the EU from various websites which I think will interest them.

3. How are UKIP doing in London? What are the local successes and breakthroughs that you are hoping to build upon?

Because UKIP has been seen as a one-issue party – leaving the EU – we have not won any places on local London councils in the past. Now UKIP’s policies on other issues are getting wider coverage we hope to do well in the local and general elections and give the other parties a shock.

4. Now, you're the UKIP PPC for Hammersmith. How well do you know the constituency that you're hoping to serve?

I know the constituency of Hammersmith reasonably well as I have lived in the borough for 20 years. I am involved with volunteering for a community group for the elderly which allows me to chat and hear their views. New legislation has had a damaging impact on small businesses in local areas and needs to be amended to encourage more people to start up businesses and therefore create jobs. If I am elected I would make it a priority to listen to my constituents and try and help them.

5. It's obviously very important to tell the good people of Hammersmith what you represent, above and beyond the known UKIP policies on the European Union. How do you achieve that local communication when UKIP lacks the huge fighting funds of the three established parties?

To get our message out locally we call on a large band of members to hand out leaflets at tube stations or put through people’s letterboxes and campaigning to get the UKIP message out loud and clear. I often find people come up to me while I am leafleting and we chat about what I am doing and what the EU means to them. We also have a number of members who are active in writing letters to newspapers.

6. So, if we take your position on the European Union as given for a moment, what other local and national policy areas are important to you? What would you be telling local constituents about your understanding of their daily lives and about the changes they would like to see?

Now that the Lisbon Treaty has been ratified the EU tentacles reach into every aspect of our lives and it is difficult to talk about local issues without mentioning the EU. Bearing in mind the cost of membership being £45 million per day, UKIP would like to see matrons brought back in charge of hospital wards to take responsibility for cleanliness; grammar schools built to give the poorer child a chance of a good education; the Human Rights Act scrapped which is shown to be very biased towards the criminal and ignores the victim and our police released from the mountain of paperwork for stopping someone just to ask questions; all common sense changes.

7. Now, on the specific question of the European Empire, as this blog unaffectionately refers to it... The three main parties all seem to agree. We're in it and we're staying in it forever, no matter what the people think. You've really got it easy in terms of representing the views of people opposed to the European project, haven't you?

Yes, you are right that we are the only mainstream party representing people who are opposed to the EU. However, we still need to work hard to get our message out to the public and show how corrupt, dishonest and undemocratic the EU is and persuade them to vote UKIP.

8. Back to the London question, with so many European people living in London, are you going to have to work harder than other UKIP candidates to explain that it's not the people of Europe that UKIP is opposed to? Or do you think that those Europeans living and working here in London might positively embrace the UKIP message on the European Empire?

I agree that we have to differentiate between Europe, the continent and the EU, the government. There are many Europeans who are opposed to the EU; you only have to look at the “no” vote in France, Denmark, Ireland and the Netherlands to know that we are in good company. It is the media who insist on calling it the “Europe issue” on purpose to make us look more insular but it is the governing by unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats that we oppose and I am sure there are many Europeans living in London who agree with that.

9. When we look at the three main parties and the way their MPs vote in the House of Commons, a lot of the passing through the lobbies appears to be subject to the decree of party policy and to the enforcing party whips, rather than those MPs actually voting to represent the views of local people. What do you think of that and where does UKIP stand on the issue of whips and making it's politicians adhere to centrally imposed policies?

UKIP is a party which attracts many independent thinkers and as we do not have a showing in Parliament, yet, I cannot answer this question from experience. What is clear is that the political process has to change and politicians have to be more in touch with what the voters think. We will wait and see what happens but looking at the calibre of UKIP candidates who are businessmen with experience of the real world, the Palace of Westminster would be a very different place were UKIP voted into office (not power). An MP, after all, is elected to represent the views of their constituents and not the party.

10. Getting slightly more controversial, a lot of people opposed to the surrender of British sovereignty believe that the current Government had no right to sign the Lisbon Treaty. Amongst many other actions, quite a few even wrote to Her Majesty The Queen about the issue but - from what we've seen - their letters were passed to the Foreign Office. Have you seen any of that conversation on the internet and would you care to comment?

You may not be surprised to know that I was one of those people who wrote to Her Majesty about signing the Lisbon Treaty and, as you say, my letter was passed to the Foreign Office. Her Coronation Oath was modified but still states that she govern her subjects. As she is now a citizen of the EU we are no longer subjects but citizens of the same State. It makes me very angry that since the Lisbon Treaty came into force we are no longer a sovereign nation with the power to make our own laws.

11. We've noticed on the online comments pages of the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail a large number of people saying they are transferring their allegiances from the Conservatives to UKIP. What would you say to those former Conservative supporters? Is UKIP attracting solely disaffected Conservatives or are you attracting support from across the political spectrum?

Yes, I have seen some of those comments – I, myself used to be a Tory voter. I would say to those people “welcome on board, common sense has prevailed” The expenses scandal angered many loyal voters and the broken “cast iron” promise angered even more. I believe UKIP is attracting support from right across the political spectrum and, as well as Conservatives, supporters of other parties are also choosing to change their voting habits.

12. So, we've asked some very heavy questions in this interview. We'd like to end on a fun, very light-hearted note. A Hollywood producer calls and casts you as Scarlett O'Hara in a remake of Gone With The Wind. You can cast anybody you like as Rhett Butler. Who would you cast as your leading man and why?

This is a difficult one! I have always had a soft spot for Omar Sharif, I think it is the accent and the smouldering black eyes! But perhaps on this occasion I will choose Peter O’Toole, as he was in Lawrence of Arabia. He is wickedly mischievous, sexy and elegant.

Thank you very much indeed for your time, Vanessa! We wish you well and will be keeping an eye open for news of your progress in the election campaign.

Gordon goes to Chilcot...

It never rains but it pours for Gordon.

Must be all that 'man made global warming' he believes in. Always under a cloud...

At the eye of the storm over allegations of bullying, he now has to go to the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war on 5th March.

He's not going to be calling a General Election anytime soon, one wouldn't have thought.

See also: Are you remembering what I'm remembering? - Part 6

Anti-bullying helpline: We HAVE received calls (updated)

The boss of the National Bullying Helpline (no, we didn't know there was such a thing either) has poured petroleum on the smouldering embers of the scandal surrounding Andrew Rawnsley's claims about Gordon Brown.

Speaking on camera to the BBC, Christine Pratt said that the organisation HAD received a number of calls in recent years from people working in Gordon Brown's office.

She said that denials of these stories compound the stress for those who have suffered. Ms. Pratt suggests that a responsible organisation ought take a more mature role to address such a problem where it is found.

Taking care not to make any conclusions, Ms. Pratt said: "I am not saying Gordon Brown is a bully, I am not a judge. But I am appalled at the outright denial that is going on without due process being followed."

This follows in sharp contrast to the well-reported comment of Peter Mandelson who, when asked about the allegations of Brown's bullying, denied their validity saying: "I would like to think that I took my medicine like a man."

Benedict Brogan in the Telegraph muses: "There is still plenty to be told. Quite how so many senior people, from Tony Blair on down, allowed a politician whose flaws they well knew to end up running the country, is a question Labour will have to answer."

Monday newspaper update

The Times observes: "For all his faults, it is hard to picture Tony Blair actually bullying anybody. Gordon Brown’s predecessor may have undermined and patronised; he may have charmed his colleagues while encouraging other colleagues to knife them in the back, but it is hard to see him grabbing anybody by the lapels and snarling into their face."

Bruce Anderson in The Independent writes: "Gordon Brown deserves no gentleness. But he has now created his legacy. He is the first Prime Minister whose staff have complained to the national bullying hotline."

The Sun has a thought about official denials, saying: "GORDON Brown's "reign of terror" behind the closed doors of Downing Street is serious enough. But to add to the troubling image of an out-of-control Prime Minister, it seems there was a major operation to mislead voters."

10.30am update: Good grief. We go into an illegal war, our national sovereignty is signed away by an unelected Prime Minister, al of our centuries old civil liberties are curtailed and - what is it that looks like guaranteeing the end of Labour? Workplace bullying. Who'd have thought...

The democratic mystery

"If Parliament becomes so disconnected from those who send us here, its sovereignty, which has been a bastion of our liberal interpretation of our liberty, in fact becomes the greatest tyranny, and that what this House imposes without reference to the public disconnects it from the public, and undermines the very constitutional search that we have undergone to become a free and democratic people."
- Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative), 19th Jan 2010

If the governing class govern with the consent of the governed (that's us)...

And if the governing class does not and will not govern in the way we wish...

And if as the taxpayers we own all the infrastructure...

And if enough of us approached Her Majesty...

And if enough of us were brave enough....

Couldn't we just start again?

Couldn't we, the people just set up a whole new Parliament that represented we, the people?

A whole new Parliament here in Britain - not in Brussels.

A whole new Parliament that didn't constantly create petty rules and laws.

A whole new Parliament that had common law at it's heart.

If the majority willed it, would not Her Majesty have to recognise us?

If we could get 60% of the population to vote for such a 'start again' people's Parliament compared to 35%-40% voting for a discredited anti-democratic Parliament... wouldn't our democratic supremacy have to be recognised?

Just thinking aloud.

One thing is sure - we can't keep going on like this.

The more the govern-ing think they can do what they want to us, the less we, the people are consenting to be governed. This is not a healthy road we're walking. And maybe starting again is the most sensible solution.

It could all be done very peacefully. We simply have our own elections. Let the discredited system carry on with it's Parliament and we, the people start again with our own - backed by more of the population (hopefully).

We already have a perfectly good written constitution dating from the 17th century - still on the statute books, just blatantly ignored by the current ruling class.

How about this for a start. I was born a freeman. All of my rights are inherent. I promise not to harm, injure, or cause loss to anyone (the common law principles). Beyond that, I will always remain a freeman.

Is that so radical? Or is there some sensible humanity in that thinking?

Sunday, 21 February 2010

Greece bail-out: The €3.6 billion mystery that British taxpayers might have to pay

Dan Hannan (why haven't you defected to UKIP yet?) has a fascinating blog post up.

In what is an intriguing development, it appears that we, the people of Britain might be being positioned to have to cough up €3.6 billion (£3.16 billion) to bailout the Eurozone nation.

Here's Dan Hannan's discovery.

It is time we, the people said no.

Contact your MP now and tell them that they must not allow this to happen.

Are you remembering what I'm remembering - Part 8

While controversy rages about allegations that Gordon Brown is abusive towards his staff - allegations that are strongly denied by Downing Street - we thought we'd take the heat off him for a few moments by asking...

Are you remembering what I'm remembering?

Our unelected Prime Minister is not the only controversial figure that has marked Labour's thirteen years in power.

Indeed, for the party that came into office vowing to clean up sleaze, there does seem to have been an awful lot of it about.

Let's recap on some of the big Labour-sleaze and scandal stories that spring instantly to mind.

The Bernie Ecclestone affair

Peter Mandelson - the first resignation

Peter Mandelson - the second resignation

David Blunkett's resignation

Cash for peerages

Blair quizzed by police

Mandelson and Deripaska

The Damian Green affair

Electoral fraud to 'shame a banana republic'

Porn films on expenses

Jacqui Smith's apology for her expenses

Harriet Harman's driving 'incident'

The mass immigration conspiracy

The Attorney General fined for her cleaner

Caroline Flint: Labour women used as 'window dressing'

If you can think of any others we've forgotten, do remind us via the comments box.

Sunday Paper Review: 21st February 2010

The Observer is the newspaper dominating all the headlines itself as it serialises Andrew Rawnsley's book, The End of the Party. The headline claims - currently being denied by Downing Street and Gordon Brown himself - are further detail of allegations of Brown threatening and bullying his staff. The report says that cabinet secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell launched an investigation into Brown's conduct towards his staff. In and amongst the reports is also a claim that Jack Straw was taking soundings on his prospects of toppling Gordon in a bid to save the Labour Party. Anticipating the denials from Downing Street, Rawnsley tells his readers: "Journalists are never popular with the powerful when we discover uncomfortable truths about the people who govern us."

Update - 4am: Gosh, insomnia. Anyway, despite Downing Street denials, at around midnight, a couple of big name Tory MPs were twittering that Labour's Stephen Pound confirmed to Sky that Gordon Brown was warned about his conduct. Didn't see that, wasn't watching, nothing on Sky News website - but that's what big name Tory MPs had twittered amongst themselves.

The Mail on Sunday also has reports of Gordon Brown's alleged rages, focussing on an incident in which Brown is alleged to have raged at Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England. It also runs with claims that two Labour MPs - Bill Etherington and Geraldine Smith - were involved in a shameful champagne drinking contest while enjoying an official trip to Paris. Their report claims that Etherington became so violently ill that a doctor had to be called. The newspaper also claims that it's investigation has uncovered "shocking details of how MPs spend more than £800,000 a year on European junkets, which some of them freely admit are an orgy of drinking." The newspaper quotes Labour's MP Paul Flynn who is highly critical of the nature of drunkenness by British politicians lapping up Council of Europe jollies. Other sources for it's report are named in the article.

The Independent on Sunday has an interview with Gordon Brown which it puts under the headline "The underdog bites back". Quite how a serving Prime Minister can be seen as an underdog is a mystery, even if he is an unelected one hated by much of the country. It's not really that revelatory. Mostly, he moans about the Labour Party not having much money for advertising and slick marketing these days...

The Sunday Times reports that the Conservatives plan on selling 'cheap shares' in Lloyds and RBS to members of the public. Would these be the same shares that we already own as taxpayers after we bailed the banks out for hundreds of billions of pounds? I do keep checking the doormat to see if my share certificates have arrived yet. Neat trick! Naff off... The plan comes against the backdrop of a poll which reveals that quite a few people have fallen for Gordon Brown having a cry on the telly. Squish, squish, sweetie... squish, squish.

The News of the World carries a lengthy article in which Conservative number two William Hague implies that Gordon Brown might be deliberately sabotaging the country in the belief that Labour will not win the General Election. Hague describes the New Labour lot as "the worst Government in modern history".

The Sunday Telegraph reports on Michael Heseltine's predictions of a hung Parliament under the headline: "Conservatives cannot win outright". It also has a report on a whole host of 'climate change'-related lawsuits being filed against the Obama administration in the States - more specifically, at the EPA and it's reliance on the IPCC's 'dodgy dossier' on 'man made global warming' turned 'climate change' turned 'CO2 pollution'.

The Sunday Express features UKIP-supporter Stuart Wheeler. The tycoon expresses his thoughts on Speaker John Bercow, who Wheeler accuses of being as mired in the expenses scandal as the rest of them. Wheeler makes a public offer to Farage and UKIP for financial aid to their campaign.

Saturday, 20 February 2010

Are you remembering what I'm remembering? - Part 7

"Small pleasures, small pleasures, who would deny us these?"
- from Lionel Bart's Oliver!

Thousands upon thousands of pieces of legislation have been passed by this New Labour government - many without any Parliamentary scrutiny whatsoever.

Not all of those (though probably most) are opposed by the majority.

In the first minority issue that his blogger will examine, we're turning our attention to the outright ban on smoking in public places.


Now, many support the smoking ban. That is understood.

However, there is the matter of free will and choice.

As a result - in full or in part - of the smoking ban, many pubs up and down the country, the heartbeat of a community, are closing down.

Generally speaking, smokers simply go out far less - if at all.

The model in place in a number of other European countries involves the use of separate ventilated rooms where appropriate for smokers. Venues can display appropriate signs giving customers a free-will choice about whether to enter those premises or not.

Free-will choice.

Are you remembering what I'm remembering?

When the smoking ban was debated in Parliament on 14th February 2006, there was the option to settle on a partial ban - exempting some premises from such a ban.

It was a proposal that was heavily defeated - 384 votes to 184 votes. They even did this when the Government allowed a free vote - so, this was one piece of statute that they can't even pin on bullying whips.

The option to exclude private members clubs from a ban was defeated by an even greater margin.

Those 384 MPs said that you would have no say whatsoever...

No choice, no freedom.

That was their will and you were going to like it or lump it - tough luck and all that.

They could have compromised, but they chose not to.

And here are the names of all of the MPs concerned; those who denied smokers and bar and venue owners any choice or freedom whatsoever.

And non-smokers remember - you might approve of their vote on this issue, but... this time they denied people a choice on smoking... what will they deny YOU a choice on without a compromise if you re-elect them? Think about it...

You might want to check all of these MP's names against the official report into MPs expenses claims - if you're effected by their vote and want to build a campaign against them locally.

Diane Abbott (Labour)
Nick Ainger (Labour)

Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Danny Alexander (Lib Dem)
Douglas Alexander (Labour)
Graham Allen (Labour)
David Amess (Conservative)
David Anderson (Labour)
Janet Anderson (Labour)
James Arbuthnot (Conservative)
Hilary Armstrong (Labour)
Ian Austin (Labour)
John Austin (Labour)
Adrian Bailey (Labour)
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Ed Balls (Labour)
Gordon Banks (Labour)
Celia Barlow (Labour)
John Barrett (Lib Dem)
Kevin Barron (Labour)
John Battle (Labour)
Hugh Bayley (Labour)

Margaret Beckett (Labour)
Anne Begg (Labour)
Alan Beith (Lib Dem)
Sir Stuart Bell (Labour)
Hilary Benn (Labour)
Joe Benton (Labour)
John Bercow (Conservative)
Sir Paul Beresford (Conservative)
Roger Berry (Labour)
Clive Betts (Labour)
Liz Blackman (Labour)
Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour)
Tony Blair (Labour)
Hazel Blears (Labour)
David Blunkett (Labour)
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Tim Boswell (Conservative)
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Tom Brake (Lib Dem)
Julian Brazier (Conservative)
Kevin Brennan (Labour)
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Annette Brooke (Lib Dem)
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Lyn Brown (Labour)
Nick Brown (Labour)
Russell Brown (Labour)
Des Browne (Labour)
Malcolm Bruce (Lib Dem)
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Karen Buck (Labour)
Richard Burden (Labour)
Colin Burgon (Labour)
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Paul Burstow (Lib Dem)
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Lorely Burt (Lib Dem)
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Stephen Byers (Labour)
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Dr. Vincent Cable (Lib Dem)
Richard Caborn (Labour)
David Cairns (Labour)
Gregory Campbell (DUP)
Sir Menzies Campbell (Lib Dem)
Martin Caton (Labour)
Ian Cawsey (Labour)
Colin Challen (Labour)
Ben Chapman (Labour)
David Chaytor (Labour)
Michael Clapham (Labour)
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Katy Clark (Labour)
Paul Clark (Labour)
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Tom Clarke (Labour)
Ann Clwyd (Labour)
Vernon Coaker (Labour)
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Michael Connarty (Labour)
Frank Cook (Labour)
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Stephen Crabb (Conservative)
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Ann Cryer (Labour)
David Curry (Conservative)
Claire Curtis-Thomas (Labour)
Alistair Darling (Labour)
Wayne David (Labour)
Ian Davidson (Labour)
Janet Dean (Labour)
John Denham (Labour)
Jim Devine (Labour)
Parmjit Dhanda (Labour)
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Jim Dobbin (Labour)
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Jeffrey Donaldson (UUP)
Brian Donohoe (Labour)
Frank Doran (Labour)
Nadine Dorries (Conservative)
Jim Dowd (Labour)
David Drew (Labour)
Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour)
Mark Durkan (SDLP)
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Clive Efford (Labour)
Louise Ellman (Labour)
Tobias Ellwood (Conservative)
Natascha Engel (Labour)
Jeff Ennis (Labour)
David Evennett (Conservative)
Michael Fabricant (Conservative)
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Tim Farron (Lib Dem)
Lynne Featherstone (Lib Dem)
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Robert Flello (Labour)
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Barbara Follett (Labour)
Michael Foster (Labour) [Worcs.]
Michael Jabez Foster (Labour) [Hastings & Rye]
Dr. Hywel Francis (Labour)
Mike Gapes (Labour)
Andrew George (Lib Dem)
Neil Gerrard (Labour)
Ian Gibson (Labour)
Sandra Gidley (Lib Dem)
Linda Gilroy (Labour)
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Julia Goldsworthy (Lib Dem)
Justine Greening (Conservative)
John Greenway (Conservative)
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Nigel Griffiths (Labour)
John Grogan (Labour)
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Peter Hain (Labour)
Mike Hall (Labour)
Patrick Hall (Labour)
Fabian Hamilton (Labour)
Mike Hancock (Lib Dem)
Harriet Harman (Labour)
Evan Harris (Lib Dem)
Nick Harvey (Lib Dem)
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
John Hemming (Lib Dem)
Mark Hendrick (Labour)
Stephen Hepburn (Labour)
John Heppell (Labour)
Lady Hermon (UUP)
Stephen Hesford (Labour)
Patricia Hewitt (Labour)
David Heyes (Labour)
Meg Hillier (Labour)
Margaret Hodge (Labour)
Sharon Hodgson (Labour)
Paul Holmes (Lib Dem)
Jim Hood (Labour)
Geoffrey Hoon (Labour)
Phil Hope (Labour)
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Martin Horwood (Lib Dem)
George Howarth (Labour)
Dr. Kim Howells (Labour)
Beverley Hughes (Labour)
Chris Huhne (Lib Dem)
Joan Humble (Labour)
Mark Hunter (Lib Dem)
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Glenda Jackson (Labour)
Siân James (Labour)
Diana Johnson (Labour)
David Jones (Conservative)
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Martyn Jones (Labour)
Sir Gerald Kaufman (Labour)
Daniel Kawczynski (Conservative)
Sally Keeble (Labour)
Barbara Keeley (Labour)
Alan Keen (Labour)
Ann Keen (Labour)
Paul Keetch (Lib Dem)
Fraser Kemp (Labour)
Charles Kennedy (Lib Dem)
Robert Key (Conservative)
Piara S. Khabra (Labour)
Sadiq Khan (Labour)
David Kidney (Labour)
Peter Kilfoyle (Labour)
Jim Knight (Labour)
Susan Kramer (Lib Dem)
Dr. Ashok Kumar (Labour)
Dr. Stephen Ladyman (Labour)
Eleanor Laing (Conservative)
Norman Lamb (Lib Dem)
David Lammy (Labour)
Mark Lancaster (Conservative)
Mark Lazarowicz (Labour)
John Leech (Lib Dem)
David Lepper (Labour)
Tom Levitt (Labour)
Ivan Lewis (Labour)
David Lidington (Conservative)
Martin Linton (Labour)
Tony Lloyd (Labour)
Andrew Love (Labour)
Ian Lucas (Labour)
Peter Luff (Conservative)
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Denis MacShane (Labour)
Anne Main (Conservative)
Shahid Malik (Labour)
Judy Mallaber (Labour)
John Mann (Labour)
Rob Marris (Labour)
David Marshall (Labour)
Bob Marshall-Andrews (Labour)
Eric Martlew (Labour)
Steve McCabe (Labour)
Chris McCafferty (Labour)
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour)
Ian McCartney (Labour)
William McCrea (DUP)
Alasdair McDonnell (SDLP)
John McDonnell (Labour)
Pat McFadden (Labour)
John McFall (Labour)
Jim McGovern (Labour)
Anne McGuire (Labour)
Shona McIsaac (Labour)
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Rosemary McKenna (Labour)
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Patrick Mercer (Conservative)
Gillian Merron (Labour)
Alun Michael (Labour)
Alan Milburn (Labour)
David Miliband (Labour)
Edward Miliband (Labour)
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Anne Milton (Conservative)
Austin Mitchell (Labour)
Anne Moffat (Labour)
Laura Moffatt (Labour)
Chris Mole (Labour)
Madeleine Moon (Labour)
Michael Moore (Lib Dem)
Jessica Morden (Labour)
Julie Morgan (Labour)
Elliot Morley (Labour)
George Mudie (Labour)
Chris Mullin (Labour)
Meg Munn (Labour)
Jim Murphy (Labour)
Paul Murphy (Labour)
Dan Norris (Labour)
Edward O'Hara (Labour)
Sandra Osborne (Labour)
Albert Owen (Labour)
James Paice (Conservative)
Ian Paisley (DUP)
Dr. Nick Palmer (Labour)
Mike Penning (Conservative)
John Penrose (Conservative)
Greg Pope (Labour)
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Adam Price (Plaid Cymru)
Dawn Primarolo (Labour)
Gwyn Prosser (Labour)
John Pugh (Lib Dem)
Ken Purchase (Labour)
James Purnell (Labour)
Bill Rammell (Labour)
John Randall (Conservative)
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Andy Reed (Labour)
Jamie Reed (Labour)
Alan Reid (Lib Dem)
Linda Riordan (Labour)
Willie Rennie (Lib Dem)
John Robertson (Labour)
Iris Robinson (DUP)
Peter Robinson (DUP)
Dan Rogerson (Lib Dem)
Terry Rooney (Labour)
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Paul Rowen (Lib Dem)
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Bob Russell (Lib Dem)
Joan Ryan (Labour)
Martin Salter (Labour)
Mohammad Sarwar (Labour)
Lee Scott (Conservative)
Alison Seabeck (Labour)
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Grant Shapps (Conservative)
Jonathan Shaw (Labour)
Barry Sheerman (Labour)
Jim Sheridan (Labour)
Clare Short (Ind.)
Alan Simpson (Labour)
David Simpson (DUP)
Marsha Singh (Labour)
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Andrew Smith (Labour)
Angela C. Smith (Labour) [Sheff. Hillsb.]
Angela Smith (Labour) [Basildon]
Jacqui Smith (Labour)
Sir Robert Smith (Lib Dem)
Anne Snelgrove (Labour)
Sir Peter Soulsby (Labour)
Helen Southworth (Labour)
Caroline Spelman (Conservative)
Sir John Stanley (Conservative)
Dr. Phyllis Starkey (Labour)
Ian Stewart (Labour)
Dr. Howard Stoate (Labour)
Gavin Strang (Labour)
Gary Streeter (Conservative)
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Gisela Stuart (Labour)
Andrew Stunnell (Lib Dem)
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Jo Swinson (Lib Dem)
Mark Tami (Labour)
Dari Taylor (Labour)
David Taylor (Labour)
Matthew Taylor (Lib Dem)
Richard Taylor (Ind.)
Sarah Teather (Lib Dem)
Gareth Thomas (Labour)
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Paddy Tipping (Labour)
Don Touhig (Labour)
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Paul Truswell (Labour)
Dr. Desmond Turner (Labour)
Neil Turner (Labour)
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Kitty Ussher (Labour)
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Dr. Rudy Vis (Labour)
Joan Walley (Labour)
Lynda Waltho (Labour)
Tom Watson (Labour)
Steve Webb (Lib Dem)
Dr. Alan Whitehead (Labour)
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Alan Williams (Labour)
Betty Williams (Labour)
Hywel Williams (Plaid Cymru)
Mark Williams (Lib Dem)
Roger Williams (Lib Dem)
Stephen Williams (Lib Dem)
Jenny Willott (Lib Dem)
Michael Wills (Labour)
Rob Wilson (Conservative)
Sammy Wilson (DUP)
David Winnick (Labour)
Rosie Winterton (Labour)
Mike Wood (Labour)
Shaun Woodward (Labour)
Anthony Wright (Labour)
David Wright (Labour)
Iain Wright (Labour)
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Tony Wright (Labour)
Derek Wyatt (Labour)
Sir George Young (Conservative)
Richard Younger-Ross (Lib Dem)

Notice how many Liberal Democrats are in this list - not looking so 'liberal' now, are they? As for the democrat bit - remember the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty they promised you?

* UKIP has policies which enable venues providing a properly ventilated room to choose whether to allow smoking for their customers. It also campaigns and raises awareness of the plight of the Great British pub - pubs at the heart of our communities which are shutting down at alarming speed.