The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.
"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01
"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."
Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution
Wednesday, 19 January 2011
Is Theresa May actually Jacqui Smith in a mask?
This is the guy who threatened to burn a copy of the Koran in the United States on the anniversary of 9/11.
Now, leaving aside the fact that this blogger thinks the official story of 9/11 is a load of old tosh...
But hang on. What's going on here?
Someone who threatened to burn the Koran is banned.
Yet the Islamist extremists who burned poppies on Remembrance Sunday and those who threatened to create unpleasant scenes in Wootton Bassett... they're allowed to stay? And get away with it?
I just don't understand it.
I don't blame the Muslim community for this decision. Actually, I feel sorry for them. For such ludicrous double standards - which is what many will perceive this as - will do nothing to bridge the divide between communities. Quite the opposite.
The political class must know that, surely?
Fine - ban the pastor if you like. I actually couldn't care less about him or his religious beliefs. Nor could I care less about the religious book he wants to demonstrate against.
I can even see why he might upset a fair few people.
Yet you cannot ban someone like him while turning a blind eye while we have activities like the poppy burning outrage on our streets.
And why announce it like this anyway? Talk about making a celebrity of the man!
One can only conclude that the politicians behind decisions and actions such as these (or lack of) are deliberately trying to get us all at each other's throats... for some sinister motive or agenda.
...like deliberately making us all too busy arguing amongst ourselves that we're not noticing what the politicians and the globalists are getting up to, perhaps?
I've noticed what Theresa May is getting up to.
And I'm beginning to conclude that she is simply Jacqui Smith in a mask.
Banning people whose opinions you do not like is not exactly 'conservative' now, is it?
But then, the Conservative Party is not exactly 'conservative' now either, is it?
1 comments:
This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.
I got her number shortly after the general election, what with the EAW and the EIO - she could have opted out of both but didn't. I've never really liked or trusted her, which is pretty much my view of all politicians - some are just marginally worse/better than others but I firmly believe that they're all crooks and hypocrites to some extent.
ReplyDelete