False Flag Terror: U.S. Court to hear evidence suggesting the underwear bomber was a shill

We heard this within a week of the underwear bomber incident... as did, no doubt, quite a large number of our free-thinking readers.

And now, the whole world shall hear this testimony:

Remember - those naked body scanners at airports were miraculously all ready, built and ready to be rolled out, almost the day after the underwear bomber drama.

Now what we need to know is who was by the accused's side at the airport?

H/T: Radio Free Britain

Sunday Paper Review: 30th January 2011

In her song In Your Eyes, the always lovely and always phenomenal Kylie Minogue once asked: "Is the world still spinning around?".

Looking around the Sunday papers, the answer appears to be: "Yes... but only just."

It certainly appears to have gone quite mad. Must be all the fluoride in the water.

In the Sunday Telegraph, the revolt-cum-uprising-cum-revolution in Egypt takes key focus. The newspaper reports that the death toll may be higher than official figures, relating how live ammunition has been used on protesters.

Placing the story into a domestic context, the report carries the official line from Downing Street who have apparently stated that: "[David Cameron has] emphasised that violent repression of peaceful protest was wrong and counterproductive."

Let's hope Call Me Dave will take the same view next time an innocent newspaper seller who isn't even protesting dies on the streets of London.

Leaving aside the student protests here, the Sunday Express is headlining with a story about how we're all supposedly getting very angry about the price of petrol.

Their poll, conducted by Angus Reid, finds: "84 per cent of people demanding that the Chancellor should axe the rise in fuel duty scheduled for April."

We're guessing the other 16 per cent still believe in 'man made global warming'.

Worryingly, the report also states that: "Labour commands a double-digit lead in the polls which would give them a thumping 134 seat majority if an election was called tomorrow."

We can't tell the difference between the LibLabCon parties anymore... except that the Labour variety of the one party state are the biggest advocates of creating a gigantic police state with no freedom and no liberties whatsoever.

All in the name of fighting 'terror', of course.

The terror the political class the world over feel that we, the people might have rumbled them, that is.

Not very often that this blog shows any sympathy with positions taken in The Observer, but there is one where we give our total support.

Today, the leftist newspaper of choice throws it's spotlight back on to plans to sell off Britain's forests and woodlands.

They tell how broadcaster Melvyn Bragg is outraged by proposals to sell off "more than 30 forests and woodlands across the Lake District".

This blogger is also outraged. Well, no - not outraged. Utterly repulsed. The treachery and vandalism being visited upon this beautiful country by the political elite of all persuasions over the last forty years is utterly incalculable and getting to be something that, at some point or another, is uniting people. When that happens, there may be trouble ahead.

And look at this issue... it's got this small 'c' conservative blogger sharing sympathies and in agreement with editorial lines being taken in The Observer, of all things.

Thankfully, we need feel no embarrassment. The patriotic Sunday Express also feels the same it seems.

Oppose the sale of our forests and woodlands with every vigour!

If the Independent on Sunday is to be believed, then one could be forgiven for thinking that the Government here is determined to see how far they can provoke the people before we all kick off, Egypt style.

Discussions are taking place, the newspaper reports, which would mean that: "Every home in the country could be forced to have a water meter".

As if taxing fresh air in the name of 'man made global warming' (jolly cold still, huh?) weren't enough; now they want to monitor our water... you know, that natural liquid which goes in a cycle between sky and sea - and no doubt enable private companies (owned by globalists) to charge us a fortune for the privilege.

And get this bit! The reports states that: "The RSPB charity has recommended – to the cross-party environment, food and rural affairs (Efra) select committee – full compulsory metering in England and Wales by 2020".

What? Hang on a minute! The RSPB? The bird people? What on earth has it got to do with them?

And who elected the bird people to a position in which they have direct access to influencing Government policy?

The People reports how Spanish banking group Santander has "mistakenly sent details of a million UK customers to a company in France."

Databases, data security, globalisation and banking - all in one story. We could spend a few hours deconstructing this one, but we reckon you'll have a good view of our opinion from that brief summary of the position.

Hilariously, the tabloid opens that report by calling Santander "ONE of Britain’s biggest banks".

They must be due to be on the receiving end of untold trillions of taxpayer's money on the never-never for no good reason soon, then. Every other bank seems to have had it's share.

And the Spanish economy no doubt could do with a few trillion from the British taxpayer. Doing it through Santander would just bypass the European Union aspect.

More madness in the Mail on Sunday - but this comes in the form of one of the most beautifully written articles I have encountered in a very long time.

Michael Williams charts the demise of the Wrexham and Shropshire rail service amidst crazy operating environments whereby: "You can get off at Wolverhampton but you can’t get on."

The article conveys the romance of the railways, whilst noting how: "Our great railway system [...] has been carved up [...] by a small number of big corporate players who bid vast sums of money for monopoly franchises and receive lavish guarantees from the taxpayer."

It really is a bittersweet read - and if you read nothing else this weekend, we highly recommend putting a few minutes into reading this one.

And finally... the Sunday Mirror say that 'boyband' Blue are to represent the United Kingdom at this year's Eurovision Song Contest.

Yes, it is still running. Yes, we - the people of the UK - are still bankrolling it.

Well, it did give us ABBA, I suppose.

Eurovision... ABBA... Waterloo, "Napoleon did surrender", Belgium, Emperor von Rumpy-Pumpy... can you see where we're going with this?

In the words of Kylie, we should be so lucky... lucky, lucky, lucky.

Biased BBC: How the opinions of the 'Question Time' panel are carefully managed

Sometimes, the things that you really should know are hidden in plain view - carefully left planted for the observant to notice and signpost.

And so it is with this gem regarding the Biased BBC and it's flagship political programme Question Time.

Over on Conservative Home, Alex Deane is letting off steam about the composition of the latest panel.

But keep reading, eagle eyed readers...

For in the comments, there is an anecdotal revelation from a familiar name - one 'Daniel Hannan'.

He reveals how: "I was asked on Tuesday morning whether I would appear on tonight's show. I asked how definite the invitation was. The editor replied by asking me whether I supported control orders [...] and whether I thought Sky had overreacted in the football sexism row [...]. The programme replied that they were looking for someone whose views would balance the panel better than mine, which is fair enough I suppose, so that was that."

See that?

"The programme replied that they were looking for someone whose views would balance the panel better than mine".

And that, dear reader, is the gem that one must ponder...

That's before pondering how the well-researched audience always appears to be incredibly left-wing leaning. Or 'balanced' in BBC-speak.

Whilst Dan Hannan's is the most revelatory comment on the matter, there is one response that is even more worth reading... try this one. Not guilty, unfortunately...

...but the people everywhere they've kept faith with Princess Diana

Apologies for light blogging this week. Normal service will now resume.

One thing about blogging is that you need to feel inspired enough by a story in order to want to comment.

One subject - one person is guaranteed to get us back to the computer...

-------------------------------------------------------

"...but the people everywhere, they kept faith with Princess Diana - they liked her, loved her, they regarded her as one of the people. She was the people's princess. And that's how she will remain in our hearts and in our memories for ever."

Okay, the messenger of that tribute - Tony Blair - is no longer held in high esteem, but the person to whom he was speaking about most certainly is.

In a very unusual story, the Daily Express reports that "MOST Britons think it is possible to communicate with the dead..."

And we love the next part of the sentence:

"...and the person they would most like to talk to is Princess Diana."

Wonderful, wonderful!

Of all the many great people who have lived and died, the people have kept faith in Princess Diana.

She may have been killed in the way that she told people was being planned...

There may have been a vile campaign to trash her memory and smear her reputation...

...but the people everywhere, they've kept faith in Princess Diana. She is the People's Princess and that is how she will remain - in our hearts and memories for ever.

It is unusual stories like this, the rare and lesser stated British sentimentality and romance, their love of genuine goodness and kindness...

Fourteen years gone, and still we love her.

I'm suddenly more proud to be British after reading this.

And I'm very proud to play a continuing part in keeping the cherished memory of our Diana alive.

We live in troubled times, and the person that the people turn to is the Princess who pledged to her 'man-on-the-street':

"And when I look at people in public life... I'm not a political animal but I think the biggest disease this world suffers from in this day and age is the disease of people feeling unloved, and I know that I can give love - for a minute, for an hour, for a day, for a month, but I can give. I'm very happy to do that and I want to do that."

As the mainstream media insist on talking about phone hacking, can I mention the death of Princess Diana?

The mainstream media is - again - dominated by talk of phone hacking.

So, here's the thoughts that are drifting through my mind on the subject.

You and I might not have the technical knowledge or know-how to have a clue about phone hacking or how it might be achieved.

However, if at the time of Tony Blair's presence in Downing Street (May 1997 to June 2007) it was or may have been possible for journalists on Fleet Street to hack into the phones of Prime Ministers, cabinet ministers, celebrities and royalty...

...then surely, on the date of the death of Diana, Princess of Wales and the days running up to it...

Then it would be perfectly obvious that people who saw her as a threat over her campaign to eradicate anti-personnel landmines (or for any other reason); these people would surely have been perfectly capable of hacking into her phones and those of her small cortege and know exactly where she was going to be and when.

I know, as fact, that Diana was always on the telephone. We know about 'Squidgygate' so the fact that her telephones were hacked into once and her conversations re-transmitted in order to do her reputation damage is no revelation.

And if her phones - or those of her companions - were being hacked in the last week of her life...

...it would explain the harassment and pursuit by paparazzi that her group endured after arriving at Le Bourget airport outside Paris on Saturday 30th August 1997...

...and it would explain how most of what later transpired would have been assisted.

Diana knew her phones and communications were being interfered with, bugged and monitored. She complained about it endlessly.

When this became public, her detractors labelled her as 'paranoid'.

Just thought we'd set the record straight for her. She doesn't look so paranoid now, does she?

There is still no explanation for the route taken by driver Henri Paul - a known intelligence service informant, whose blood samples remain - and will always remain - a source of suspicion.

And no... this blogger will never shut up about Diana, our Princess. Not ever.

Now, about those authenticated, handwritten notes she left with people.

'They are planning an 'accident' in my car...'

Quote of the Day: The 'stating the bleeding obvious' edition

"...is the BBC biased? In my view, ‘bias’ is too blunt a word to describe the subtleties of the ­pervading culture. The better word is a ‘mindset’. At the core of the BBC, in its very DNA, is a way of thinking that is firmly of the Left."

- Former BBC News frontman Peter Sissons gets the bad taste of institutional brainwashing off his chest, via a visit to the Daily Mail.

We say: Gosh. He's brave. Arguing with the left? Expressing an opinion against it's mouthpiece, the BBC..?

He's a braver man than most. Shame it's taken him two decades to pluck up the courage, though.

Interview of the week: UKIP's Godfrey Bloom calls for jail sentences for eurozone architects

If you want to hear from UKIP, don't watch the BBC or Sky News. They only deal in the LibLabCon.

If you want to hear from patriotic, non-treason committing British politicians, switch to Russia Today. Here's UKIP's Godfrey Bloom delivering this week's interview of the week:

How predictable. A spin doctor has become the news of the world.

Well, this has all backfired a little on Downing Street.

No doubt they were hoping that the resignation of Andy Coulson during Tony Blair's evidence to the Iraq inquiry might have meant he could slip off silently back into the shadows.

However, this is Britain - land of The X Factor.

"We interrupt coverage of Tony Blair's evidence.."

And so on.

Now, rather than concentrating on whether or not Tony Blair stood up to scrutiny over decisions to go to war...

...we get wall-to-wall Andy Coulson, a former News of the World hack who went to go play spin-doctor for the Abomination Government.

Oh, hang on. Just flicked back to the BBC News channel. Blair is back on...

Poor Sky News viewers.

UPDATE at 2pm: Yup, Andy Coulson is the main story on the BBC bulletin, too.

Seems our self-indulgent media is too interested in discussing itself rather than a trivial matter like war.

Tony Blair proves himself to be Teflon Tony once more. Labour should get him back. He was, after all, the last man to win a majority and become Prime Minister.

And we've had two-and-a-half more PM's since then.

Labour: Johnson's resignation is a right Balls up!

Labour The Marxist Party's Alan Johnson has resigned as Shadow Chancellor for 'personal reasons'.

Who cares? Goodbye. Don't let the door slap you on the arse as you exit.

And who are they promoting in his place?

Ed Balls!

How hilarious!

We predict that the curse of Gordon Brown will shortly bring down (Mr.) Ed (Miliband), too...

Only, the Conservatives will (rightly) have a ball roughing up Balls. Then who will the backbench Marxists look to blame?

It doesn't, after all, need Gordon Brown's curse to make anyone dislike Ed Balls.

Balls is capable of being hated, all by himself.

...but watch and see how many times Gordon Brown's name is thrown in Ed Balls' face over the coming weeks and months.

Updates: Fraser Nelson at The Spectator writes: "There are intriguing rumours in Westminster that [Alan Johnson's] resignation was sped along by impending revelations in the press."

And, as we update again just before midnight, Sky News is reporting that sources are telling them that Alan Johnson's former police protection officer is facing suspension over an affair with Alan Johnson's wife.

Is Theresa May actually Jacqui Smith in a mask?

News breaking on the BBC that the 'controversial' American pastor Terry Jones has been banned from entering Britain 'for the public good'.

This is the guy who threatened to burn a copy of the Koran in the United States on the anniversary of 9/11.

Now, leaving aside the fact that this blogger thinks the official story of 9/11 is a load of old tosh...

But hang on. What's going on here?

Someone who threatened to burn the Koran is banned.

Yet the Islamist extremists who burned poppies on Remembrance Sunday and those who threatened to create unpleasant scenes in Wootton Bassett... they're allowed to stay? And get away with it?

I just don't understand it.

I don't blame the Muslim community for this decision. Actually, I feel sorry for them. For such ludicrous double standards - which is what many will perceive this as - will do nothing to bridge the divide between communities. Quite the opposite.

The political class must know that, surely?

Fine - ban the pastor if you like. I actually couldn't care less about him or his religious beliefs. Nor could I care less about the religious book he wants to demonstrate against.

I can even see why he might upset a fair few people.

Yet you cannot ban someone like him while turning a blind eye while we have activities like the poppy burning outrage on our streets.

And why announce it like this anyway? Talk about making a celebrity of the man!

One can only conclude that the politicians behind decisions and actions such as these (or lack of) are deliberately trying to get us all at each other's throats... for some sinister motive or agenda.

...like deliberately making us all too busy arguing amongst ourselves that we're not noticing what the politicians and the globalists are getting up to, perhaps?

I've noticed what Theresa May is getting up to.

And I'm beginning to conclude that she is simply Jacqui Smith in a mask.

Banning people whose opinions you do not like is not exactly 'conservative' now, is it?

But then, the Conservative Party is not exactly 'conservative' now either, is it?

Quote of the Day: Our Nigel "has gone global", says Mary Ellen Synon

The always spectacular Mary Ellen Synon at the Daily Mail recounts a charming story about Nigel Farage today.

I won't spoil it, but she ends with the lines: "'Next time you see Nigel,' said the Chinese-German-American, 'tell him he has fans in America and a waiting audience.' The UKIP leader it seems, has gone global. Youtube may have a lot to answer for."

We say: Yup. Our look at YouTube yesterday showed strong popularity for UKIP from throughout the European Union. Well, from the people of the European Union, that is.

We're on your side, too, everyone!

Outside of the dreaded EU, Nigel's popularity possibly owes as much to (the English broadcasts of) Russia Today as YouTube.

Strange that so many UKIP politicians can only get their message out to the people of the UK if they go via a Russian broadcaster, YouTube, or the Austin, Texas-based Alex Jones and InfoWars.com...

Anybody come up with a good conspiracy theory as to why we see much less of UKIP on the BBC and Sky News compared to on these non-UK based broadcasters?

Those early-1970's secret deals in smoky rooms between the broadcasters, the printed press and the Foreign Office aimed at brainwashing the British people regarding the EU still ongoing, perhaps?

It's you 'civil servants' that are 'not in the public interest', Sir Gus

While yesterday was taken up with Irish printing presses, we had to hold back our view on the Iraq War Inquiry cover-up - as has been made public by inquiry chair, Sir John Chilcot.

The Evening Standard greeted an announcement by Chilcot yesterday by writing: "A cover-up row erupted when the official Iraq inquiry complained it had been banned from revealing records of the secret invasion talks between Tony Blair and George Bush."

The Independent gave a stunning account of how the refusal to make public communications between Blair and Bush Jr. came to pass, pointing the finger in their opening sentence when they wrote: "The head of the civil service has refused to allow the official inquiry into the Iraq War to publish notes sent by Tony Blair to former US president George Bush."

Meekly on the BBC, Sir Gus O'Donnell's justification is described as: "But Sir Gus said it would not be "in the public interest" to release them."

Really? Not in the public interest? Says who?

Who is Sir Gus O'Donnell? Have you met him? Have you spoken to him? Does he know your views? Has he ever canvassed them? Has he ever been elected to represent your views?

No, no, no, no and no are your answers, I'm guessing.

Yet he is meant to be a civil servant - a servant of you and I - we pay him.

And, I don't know about you, but I want to know what skulduggery our politicians may or may not have got up to.

After all, we pay them and they work for us, too.

Just like civil servants.

Who the hell is Sir Gus O'Donnell to now turn around and tell us what we can and cannot know, under the guise of whether it is "in the public interest"..?

Let the public decide what is in our interest. And, I'm guessing that almost to a man, the public want to know.

How do I know that? I've read the opinions of normal people on messageboards under every mainstream newspaper article on the topic.

The Independent is back for another bite of the cherry today and wants you to know more anyway - a journalistic two-fingers at Sir Gus O'Donnell.

The broadsheet writes: "The private memos sent between Tony Blair and President George Bush are understood to contain information about the promises Mr Blair made to Mr Bush about Britain's readiness to join any military action in Iraq. In one, the then prime minister is said to have assured Mr Bush that Britain would "be there" if an invasion became necessary. In June 2002, Mr Blair told MPs that "there are no decisions which have been taken about military action"."

I would suggest that, if Parliament has been misled - and it may have been - and if we were taken into an illegal war on the basis of manufactured lies and falsehoods - as we may have been - then that is clearly in the public interest.

So, if we do have a whitewash outcome from Chilcot - as many members of the public seem to think will be the case - then the first people to look to will not be the politicians, but the civil servants.

And it's not just on Iraq.

We've said it before and we'll say it again.

Wonder why the United Kingdom's relationship with the European Empire does not change no matter which Government we elect?

Part of that is down to the faceless 'Sir Humphrey' types... the civil servants who are unelected, who we cannot remove, who take huge salaries off the taxpayer...

...and all too often contrive to deny the will of the people.

It is the so-called 'civil servants' who are not in the public interest.

Somehow, they have to be made accountable to the will of the people.

At the moment, we haven't a clue who they're accountable to.

Time we started working that answer out.

Greetings Athens, London calling. Do you know what they've been printing in Ireland?

Holy Pluto! This is likely to get them back onto the streets in Athens.

And possibly in Lisbon, Madrid and Rome, too.

According to the Irish Independent:

"EMERGENCY lending from the ECB to banks in Ireland fell in December, the first decline since January 2010, but only because the Irish Central Bank stepped up its help to banks.

The Irish Independent learnt last night that the Central Bank of Ireland is financing €51bn of an emergency loan programme by printing its own money."

Oops. So, Athens... now that you've had to sell off your islands and national treasures and everybody has been put out of work, how do you feel knowing that you could have just printed some euroland money, after all?

In fact, you could have just had your own currency back and printed that to your heart's content.

Hat tip and interesting analysis: The Daily Bell, where British taxpayers - who are bailing out Ireland - might be interested in reading about Irish banker bonuses, too...

Update: Our good friend, The Boiling Frog, has just published an intelligent response to this news. Food for thought...

Proof that the 'New World Order' is Planetary Tyranny?

Maybe I'm not supposed to have noticed this, but when all you do is read mainstream news and these things keep jumping out, it is very difficult not to spot them.

Let's start this on the domestic scene.

The Daily Mail today tells us how: "Detectives are probing the expenses of six more politicians after they were reported by a disgruntled Labour MP."

The report carries speculation that the whistle blower might be Eric Ilsley, the disgraced Labour MP for Barnsley Central who last week pleaded guilty to dishonestly claiming more than £14,000 from the taxpayer in dodgy expense claims.

One MP has already been jailed for his fraudulent behaviour - claiming expenses that he was not entitled to. A few more are due in court to see how the evidence stacks up against them.

In the process of these expenses prosecutions, those accused tried appealing to the national constitution - or, more specifically, the Bill of Rights 1689.

They failed in their bid.

But this is the constitutional document, written down, that the public are told is not written. Come on, we've all heard it ad infinitum, how we're supposed to not have a written constitution.

Funny how we can all see and read our constitutional documents then, isn't it?

What they mean is 'we know we're a load of crooks and villains acting unlawfully, but we'll just pretend that the places where the rules of the nation are written are all documents that do not exist'.

Nowhere is this more especially clear than when it comes to the European Union. It is unlawful for any politician from this country to have signed any document surrendering national sovereignty. It is all there, in our written constitutional documents and treason laws.

As such, I reclaim my own sovereignty and consider those signatures betraying my country as null and void.

How did those signatures come to be placed in the first place? Through crooked lies, scams, and deceptions.

And let's face it, those signatures, if recognised by we, the people, would seriously impact on our way of life - our freedoms, our liberties, and our justice.

Take for example the European Arrest Warrant. Again, everything about it is unlawful under our constitution.

Yes, I'm invoking Habeas Corpus. They cannot do what they want to do under the European Arrest Warrant and Habeas Corpus says so. UKIP has been very clear, consistent and firm on this over several years, but rather than listening to UKIP as the party attempts to defend our sovereignty and freedom, too many people are allowing themselves to be conned by crooks in Whitehall and Westminster.

For more on the European Arrest Warrant, you might want to read an excellent article by Stephen Hoffman called The Sinister World of the European Arrest Warrant which was published on the grassroots website Conservative Home over the weekend.

Where does this path of unlawful European betrayal lead us? Very wealthy politicians, enslaved and penniless people - that's where.

Don't believe me? Ask the people of Ireland.

Ireland is, of course, one of the now ruined formerly sovereign nation states - destroyed at the hands of the corrupt political class. It had to be bailed out..

Yet the bail outs of Greece and Ireland were unlawful under the European Union's own written constitution, known in a case of rebranding as the 'Lisbon Treaty'.

Don't believe me? Ask Professor Markus Kerber, "the initiator of a lawsuit at the German Constitutional Court against the Greek and Irish bail-outs."

Indeed, ask the German Constitutional Court who are far better at sticking up for German national interests than our traitors in the House of Commons are at sticking up for ours. The vast majority of our Members of Parliament would sell us all down the river and into global serfdom for 10% off the price of a cup of coffee. They have no principles other than lining their own pockets.

Which is why they pretend our constitution does not exist unless they are being prosecuted for expenses fraud, upon which they soon know where the constitution is written.

It doesn't stop there.

We at The Talking Clock would like to congratulate the people of Denmark who have forced the Danish Prime Minister into a court of law over his signature on the Lisbon Treaty - again, a group of people claiming that their constitution has been breached. See here and here.

Anybody spotting a trend yet?

Let's head outside of Europe for a moment.

In the United States of America, the Tea Party movement was originally formed by people alarmed to see that their constitution - based on our own - was under attack. There are entire movements dedicated to protecting the U.S. Constitution.

Rather than anybody anywhere on the planet stopping to say that the political class are - globally - acting unlawfully in actions ruled inadmissible by their constitutions, what happens is that anybody mentioning these inconvenient facts is condemned by governments, the media and their sheeple supporters as being everything from a knuckle dragger to a racist or a terrorist.

Yes, and let's not even get onto those laws aimed at terrorists. Only, you might now spot who they were all aimed at really.

The fact is, the globalists and their national politician puppets ARE terrified. They know we've woken up to just how self-serving and corrupt they all are. They're terrified of us.

Which is a shame, because if they'd just followed the rules, we'd all get along just swimmingly.

Instead, there's a pattern of the political class - globally - acting against their national constitutions. To what end?

Instead, they ignore democracy and referendums and do what they will anyway - to hell with the will of the people.

Instead, they're seeking out ways of silencing us all.

The internet is known to be one of the things they are looking to regulate. A lot of that is emanating from the United States, but - according to Big Brother Watch - Sarkozy also wants to stop us finding solidarity with each other and sharing information by regulating the internet.

Why, one would be forgiven for thinking that they don't want us to go to the Daily Express website and read stories such as: "Prosecutors are investigating whether Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi paid for sex with an under-age girl from Morocco and then abused his power in trying to cover up the encounters."

That's fine. Ban the internet. There'll still be a Daily Express else another patriotic newspaper. We, the people can resort to individually hand-written zines and journals if we need to.

The Bill of Rights 1689 was a response to a backlash against tyranny and there were no telephones or internet back then.

As John Redwood MP writes today: "Ultimately, in all systems, the popular will is sovereign. The most powerful of medieval monarchs had to exercise power in ways that avoided alienating too many powerful forces at the same time. The most powerful of Prime Ministers has to be ever mindful of popular support and popular opinion. Even the worst tyrannies of the world can eventually be torn down by people power, as we saw in Eastern Europe and elsewhere."

And then you realise that you're not represented in this sham of a democracy at all...

I've just received an interesting email from the often brilliant people at Open Europe.

They explain how:

"The Government’s controversial European Union Bill will return to the House of Commons on 24 January, when MPs will discuss the so-called ‘referendum lock’ contained in the Bill. The lock is designed to give the public and Parliament a say over future transfers of powers from Westminster to Brussels. Though it has been subject to plenty of criticism, the Bill offers a golden opportunity to finally put a check on Brussels’ drive towards ‘ever closer union’. However, for the Bill to really withstand the steady stream of new EU laws and power grabs, it has to be strengthened.

We would encourage you to write to your MP urging them to support a stronger and more robust Bill."

And I sat there, email account at the ready, willing and prepared and able to fire off a missive to my supposed representative at the House of Commons...

When it dawned on me that the exercise is a futile and pointless waste of time.

My MP is a Labour apparatchik who was rewarded for their unflinching commitment to the Labour whip with a gig in the Shadow Cabinet.

They stood on a manifesto commitment to a referendum on the EU Constitution Lisbon Treaty and reneged.

In fact, no matter the issue, I have found it - repeatedly - utterly and totally pointless writing to them about anything whatsoever.

I live without representation under a corrupt and traitorous House of Commons passing bad statutes in direct contravention to common law and the national written constitution.

I have no way to seek redress for this matter.

And neither do you.

By definition, this means that we are actually living under tyranny.

We quickly need to come together as a people - all sixty million of us - and work out a different system of law and justice than that functioning under the House of Commons.

We must find a way of totally ignoring them, as they ignore us, and reaffirming a national commitment to our common law and constitution.

NB: Open Europe's briefing notes can be found in pdf form HERE.

Quote of the Day: 'What time are you free, Nigel?' edition

"I have written extensively on Europe, so I won’t repeat it all. But the fact remains that we’re handing new powers to Brussels faster than Labour did before us. We’ve failed to make a stand at any point. And now we have the effrontery to bring forward this “Sovereignty Bill”, which is no more than pathetic window dressing. We whipped Conservative MPs to oppose an amendment that did no more than reassert the sovereignty of parliament. What were we thinking of? We’re not fit to call ourselves Conservatives."

- Roger Helmer MEP, writing on Conservative Home, and sounding like he's due to pop along to see Nigel...

We say: True 'small c' conservatives do not vote Conservative. They vote UKIP.

Update:

Meanwhile, Lord Tebbit - who describes the Oldham by-election as "a dreadful night for the Conservatives" - has this to say about UKIP:

"Oldham is not UKIP territory, but it can be pleased to have increased its vote and put the BNP into fifth place. If the Tory leadership fails to support its own candidate in future, UKIP is set to prosper."

Old and Sad people vote LibLabCon

The people of Oldham & Saddleworth have voted for one of the three people from the one party state that is the LibLabCon.

Voting for one of the three faces of the same old one party state nation... that'll change things.

Turnout was just 48% - so the majority of people voted for nobody at all.

Of those who did bother, our calculations are that UKIP's Paul Nuttall - who came fourth - polled 5.8%, which is not bad at all... remember, a recent YouGov poll had the LibDems on 7% nationally.

Big thumbs down to Sky News whose results graphic showed the votes for Labour, the Conservatives, the LibDems and... the BNP (fifth, with 4.4%). Sky News bundled fourth placed UKIP up as part of their 'others'.

One is tempted to make a complaint...

The BBC's graphic did show Paul Nuttall and UKIP as fourth, so fair play to the Beeb for a change.

Quote of the Day: 'F-F-F-F-Off, Monsieur François Fillon' edition

"Let’s leave aside François Fillon’s attempts to drag Britain into someone else’s troubles, and instead focus on his main contention. Can you spot the flaw in his logic? European integration is failing, so we need more European integration! My go-kart has crashed, so I’m going to drive an articulated lorry! My dinghy keeps capsising, so put me at the helm of an ocean liner!"

- Daniel Hannan is far from impressed by French Prime Minister François Fillon's call for Britain to 'help save the euro'

We say: F-F-F-F-off, Fillon.

Cameroonies who might be tempted to listen to Fillon's desperate plea might also be interested in the recent opinion piece of Nile Gardiner, Director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., in the Daily Telegraph. He warned: "The deathly hand of Brussels poses a huge threat to Britain’s long-term economic growth and freedom, and must be fought with vigour by the UK’s political and business leaders."

See also:
BBC News: French PM pushes Cameron to take greater EU role
Douglas Carswell - Non, Monsieur

Poor Sunderland. Your football team is doomed.

Just a quick sympathy message for supporters of Sunderland Football Club.

Apparently, David Miliband is in line to become the club's Vice Chairman.

Taking his track record as Foreign Secretary and his actions regarding the European Union into account...

...this probably means that he's coming into the club just to sell all of your best players to Newcastle United, Hull City, Middlesbrough, and Darlington.

Well, when we say 'sell', what we mean is that - based on his track record - he'll probably sign contracts so that Sunderland's best players go to the aforementioned teams and Sunderland will agree to pay ten times above the market price of each player to their rivals, just so that those rivals can take the club's assets off your hands.

For each game, his track record on the EU suggests he'll probably decree that the manager of the opposing team for that match should get to name Sunderland's squad and decide on Sunderland's tactics. As an act of being kind to his neighbours, he will probably make your goalkeeper wear a blindfold whenever Sunderland play a home match.

And then, when Sunderland Football Club is relegated, devoid of any talent and virtually bankrupt, you can kick him out... if he hasn't walked already because you didn't tell him how much you simply adore him.

If his treacherous track record as Foreign Secretary regarding the EU is anything to go by...

Poor Sunderland. Probably.

The great EU cover-up of fraud and corruption scandal

If the Daily Telegraph or Daily Express have any sense, they'll make this the new MPs expenses scandal which should lead to our restoration of sovereignty eventually...

Maarten Engwirdla, the Dutch former Member of the European Court of Auditors, has blown the whistle in an interview in De Volkskrant on the deliberate cover-up of fraud and corruption within the European Empire.

As everyone knows, the European Empire is so corrupt that auditors have never given an unqualified opinion of the Empire's accounts since the inception of the Court of Auditors in 1975.

Now Engwirdla reveals how criticisms and exposures of EU fraud and corruption have "been sabotaged systematically for years".

"There was a practice of watering down if not completely removing criticism. I wanted to write a book, I was so sick of it all," he says.

Former EU 'anti-fraud commissioner' Siim Kallas of Estonia - now the European Empire's 'transport commisioner' - is singled out for particular criticism.

Whistle-blower Engwirdla is backed in his assertions by UKIP's Marta Andreasen, who herself is the former European Commission Chief Accountant.

Now a UKIP MEP, Andreasen says: "The EU talks of transparency but crushes whistle-blowers. It speaks of probity but it is a byword for financial corruption and waste. As a political entity, the EU stinks to high heaven. All that surprises me about the revelations of the former member of the Court of Auditors, Mr. Engwirda, is that they did not come sooner."

She also recalls how: "When I was Chief Accountant of the European Commission, I experienced huge pressure to conceal the truth about EU expenditure and not voice any criticism. I can back up what Mr Engwirda said as I witnessed the arm twisting of the Auditors each time they attempted to reveal the failures in the EU accounting and control systems. They came under huge pressure to keep the accountancy fraud hushed up."

Due to the behaviours leading to the cover-up, Marta asserts that: "In my opinion, the European Court of Auditors is not an independent body and they cannot therefore be relied upon."

And if THEY cannot be relied upon, just how corrupt is the European Empire anyway?

And why are the British taxpayers financing this corrupt organisation to the tune of many, many billions each year?

Get ready: Portugal is the next EU domino to fall - reports

Ahh, marvellous. A Monday morning, barely into the New Year, and we already have the next EU country about to fall.

The Daily Telegraph reports that Portugal will be forced to accept a bailout of some 80 billion euros.

Portugal say they don't want it, don't need it.

Which, if Ireland is a template, it means Portugal will probably be 'bailed out' by... around about Thursday?

Of course, the British taxpayer is in line to have to cough up.

We're almost bankrupt ourselves, but we have to keep finding billions to bailout the busted flush economies of euroland.

First Greece, then Ireland, and Portugal coming soon.

Spain by April, anyone? The brown stuff really will hit the fan then.

Let's see what the Daily Telegraph say...

"International investors are concerned about Portugal's debts and the EU is worried that the crisis may soon spread to Spain."

Worried about, or are planning to make sure it does?

Bye bye, Portugal. Say 'hasta luego!' to national sovereignty, Spain.

Like dominoes, they're all going down - to be governed by Frankfurt and Brussels with huge chunks sold off at rock bottom prices to global corporatists... once they've sucked up a few more billion of British taxpayer money in compulsory 'bail out' measures.

See also:
Douglas Carswell - Another week in euroland

Sunday Paper Review: 9th January 2011

So, 2011 is now truly underway. Here are the stories making their mark in the first proper set of Sundays of the new year.

The Mail on Sunday claims that David Cameron's enforcers are using "scare tactics" in a bid to stop Conservative MPs from making their views - and those of their constituents - known and represented in Parliament when the European Union Bill containing the famously laughable 'referendum lock' is voted on this week.

The report details how: "Government whips have reportedly told newly elected Conservative MPs that they risk toppling the Prime Minister if they rebel in a vote on protecting parliamentary sovereignty from the European Union."

The newspaper also contains an article by Bernard Jenkin MP - a thoroughly brilliant piece of writing which we would urge all British patriots and defenders of the national constitution to read.

The Bernard Jenkin article also single-handedly destroys the last shred of credibility that William Hague might have had, too.

To find out what UKIP's Nigel Farage thinks of the 'referendum lock', head to the Sunday Express. It quotes Nigel as saying: "The Referendum Lock could be picked by a child. Designed the way it is, this law makes things less democratic rather than more by handing even more power to the courts. It is marketing without product."

Here's something you thought you'd never see... a pro-British, EU-truth article in The Observer.

The newspaper reports on the incoming 'Welfare of Laying Hens Directive' (gosh, have the EU dictators really got nothing better to do?) and the effects that it will have on egg producing farmers.

The worry for British farmers is that we'll be the only people in the European Empire who actually comply with the damned directive, putting British business at a competitive disadvantage.

Sounds like business as usual to us. EU Directives enforced in Britain against the people's wishes, ignored in the rest of the European Empire and Britain and her businesses go to the wall as a result.

The only thing new here is that The Observer is the messenger of what normally gets branded a 'eurosceptic' story.

Things really will change when even the left start reporting uncomfortable European Empire truths.

The shooting of a Congresswoman in the United States is preoccupying the minds of the writing staff at the Sunday Telegraph. It's very strange reporting. On the one hand, they seem to quite deliberately create a false impression by running with a quote from Gabrielle Giffords' father who says: "The whole Tea Party were her enemies."

The result of that headline is that those who assimilate world events through soundbite will think the shooting is linked to the Tea Party movement.

Yet in a separate report on the incident, a former friend of the man said to be responsible is quoted as saying that he "seemed to be liberal or Left-wing" when she knew him and amongst his listed favourite books was The Communist Manifesto. He was also said to be "oddly obsessed with the 2012 prophecy".

All of which, to my mind, makes the headline soundbite linking of the incident to the Tea Party movement all the more troublesome and it looks suspiciously like a case of using an horrendous incident to promote disinformation.

The Independent on Sunday seems to have no such struggles in it's political even-handedness - it simply chooses to ignore any political party other than Labour.

In an article intended to weigh up the pros and cons of the Alternative Vote, the individual making the case for the 'yes' campaign is a "former adviser to Gordon Brown" while the case for the 'no' camp is made by a "Former Labour MP and minister".

Do talk amongst yourselves, chaps.

As far as this blog is concerned, we'll soon be launching our own campaign... for everyone to deliberately spoil the ballot paper for the referendum nobody asked for, using the opportunity instead to make it clear what we want to happen in the referendum that we do want and were promised but have never been given...

Back to the Sunday Telegraph, briefly, for it tells us how: "New flu jabs will not protect the elderly." The Mail on Sunday, meanwhile, tells us of: "Fears over mutating swine flu virus that could render vaccine useless".

And, returning to the Sunday Express, it reveals that: "UP to a million under-fives have been inoculated against the flu virus with a controversial vaccine containing poisonous mercury." The report adds that: "Pandemrix also contains a substance called squalene used to boost the immune response to the jab. It has been linked with adverse reactions including nerve problems and Gulf War syndrome."

And finally... the Sunday Mirror reveals how we're all going to be able to use Prince William's wedding to Kate Middleton as an excuse to go on the piss for fourteen hours.

God shave the... hic!

If you only buy one newspaper ever, buy today's Daily Express

British patriots are strongly urged by this blog to buy today's Daily Express.

Already the newspaper of choice for those of us who love our country, who love freedom and who love our constitution, the newspaper today publishes a free 24-page insert explaining: "Why we must rescue our country from EU dictators."

We believe that there are a larger number of copies around than might be normal. We're hearing about at least an additional 30,000 copies in London alone...

Grab a copy. Grab a copy for your family, buy one for all of your friends, spend a tenner and push a copy through the door of your neighbours, save a few spare extra copies and give them to your colleagues when you go back to work on Monday.

The Daily Express: the newspaper of patriots.

The newspaper is not going to be alone in raising a few home truths about the European Empire dictatorship.

The... ummm... Daily Express reports that Channel Four is to screen a documentary this week highlighting the lunacy of the EU Common Fisheries Policy. Hugh's Fish Fight is fronted by TV chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall. The programme will highlight how, due to EU law: "English and Welsh fishing vessels have discarded 4.8 million cod, 3.9 million haddock, 4.9 million plaice, 737,000 sole and 17 million whiting in the last 10 years, according to Government statistics."

Also in today's Daily Express, there is a report of how: "FEARS of a new wave of illegal immigrants into Europe were raised last night after Romania threatened to stop patrolling its eastern border."

The development comes in response to a row over Romania's unsuccessful efforts to become a member of the Schengen area.

If Romania carries through on it's threat, you can almost certainly guarantee that anybody who gets into the EU will soon be heading to the UK, just as they always do.

And there is nothing anything any British politician will be able to do about it. Not while we remain a member of the EU.

Nick Clegg, Mr. Seven Percent

There are two big politics stories today.

In one, we find that a politician has been sent to prison for fiddling his expenses. Or, put another way, defrauding the public purse. Or, put another way, stealing money out of the pockets of those unable to feed their families or heat their homes.

A jailed politician.

Just the one, dear? Didn't hundreds of them go on the fiddle and aren't a huge number of those still in their jobs from which they take a position of being holier than thou?

Wonder if the 'progressive' left will accept that the first person jailed is a Labour politician with more from the Labour ranks due in the dock again soon...

The other news story concerns the FibDems and YouGov polling.

As you've no doubt heard, Nick Clegg has led his yellow bellied FibDems to their lowest poll rating in twenty years - just seven percent.

Yet that's not the only story of the latest findings by the pollsters.

They also show UKIP on 4%.

So, the FibDems - rampantly europhile, dozens of MPs, in Government, the Deputy Prime Minister, loads of representation in the House of Lords... and only 7% support. This despite a massive and disproportionate amount of media coverage.

UKIP - not far behind on 4%, no MPs, no sniff of Government, barely mentioned in the media.

However, UKIP supporters might want to bulk buy tomorrow's Daily Express and get it out to friends and neighbours...

As for the FibDems... they were trusted more with public office when they had a self-confessed alcoholic leading the party!

Bet their supporters in the media won't print that!

All of this freezing is making me sweat...

The Environment Editor of The Sun today tells the newspaper's readership: "BRITS endured one of the coldest years on record in 2010, it was confirmed yesterday - as more snow was forecast today. Temperatures averaged 8°C (46°F) - just half a degree above the all-time low in 1919."

Must be all that 'man made global warming' we keep hearing about...

Meanwhile, Piers Corbyn of WeatherAction - recently acclaimed by Boris Johnson and James Delingpole and cited by the Daily Telegraph - was a guest on Alex Jones' show last night.

Corbyn has added to the pressure mounting on the taxpayer funded Met Office and their collusion in the 'climate change' scam. He blasts the Met Office for spreading "nonsense and bullshit".

Nonsense and bullshit - as he puts it - which has seen British taxpayers looted for billions by the globalists and their Marxist colluders.

Wikileaks: UKIP go to court

The Talking Clock hears that a group from UKIP are planning to make their presence felt at court on Tuesday 11th January when Wikileaks frontman Julian Assage goes before the beak to answer to the evil European Arrest Warrant that has been signed in his name.

We hear that one very high profile UKIP politician might be going...

Those who want to show their opposition to the European Arrest Warrant or to give support to Julian Assage might want to join them at Horseferry Road, Westminster, Tuesday 11th January at around 11am...

Whatever you think of Wikileaks, the European Arrest Warrant is a sinister piece of medieval, civil liberty defying wickedness and it must be opposed at every opportunity.

Just tell the British people the truth about the Very Awful Tax

Rows, lies and spin are nothing unusual from the clueless political goons and their mouthpieces. However, the representation of the rise in VAT to 20% is a masterclass example.

Our 'Quote of the Day' for yesterday came from John Redwood MP who explained: "VAT is of course an EU required tax, and the EU draws a stated proportion of the VAT revenues from each country to support its own expanding budget."

That fact must be why Osborne can state with such confidence that the rise in VAT is a permanent one. Obviously, his Rothschild friends and EU masters have spoken.

Not that the Conservative Party website wants to discuss that. They want everyone to believe that: "VAT rose to 20 per cent today as part of the Coalition Government’s plan to reduce the record deficit left by the last Government."

For Osborne's part, he tries selling the VAT rise as 'progressive' (doesn't that word make you want to vomit already?) and as part of measures to reduce the 'deficit' - the deficit being entirely felt in the pockets of ordinary people; not by politicians, globalists or bankers.

Yet he almost gives half of the EU angle of the VAT rise away in a quote carried by the Daily Telegraph. Note our emphasis: "But when you’ve got a very large budget deficit and you’re in the middle of a European sovereign debt crisis – and you’ve decided that at least part of dealing with the deficit has to come from tax rises – then I think VAT presents itself as the choice."

Would this be the European sovereign debt crisis in which Britain borrows untold billions at interest, just so that we can bail out Greece and Ireland, for example?

Not that this stops the European Union taking plenty more billions of our money.

Tell you what, Georgie... why not comply with the demand to put up the European Union's VAT revenue source and then claim it's a 'progressive' tax?

As far as the 'progressive' badge of dishonour goes, Mr. Ed - the irrelevant and inconsequential leader of the Labour Marxist Party is concerned, this is the big battleground.

The Guardian informs us that: "Ed Miliband accuses George Osborne of misleading public over VAT."

Awww. Poor little rich boy Marxist, all upset that the Tories have nicked his 'progressive' badge?

And yet none of them - bar John Redwood - have actually told the ever suffering British public what lies behind VAT, a very awful tax indeed.

Miliband, meanwhile, ought to shut his mouth. Otherwise, we might have to remember that Labour was guilty of misleading the British public about the Lisbon Treaty, it was Labour that was guilty of misleading the British public on a referendum... and it was Miliband's brother who treacherously signed the Lisbon Treaty.

The People of the World vs. the New World Order: The marvellous United States of America lead the way in patriotic fightback anthems

There's a place down in Tennessee...

So, if you were wondering why you're called a racist / terrorist / whatever they're calling us all this week, remember that it's all about divide and rule, smokescreens, and this... 2m 13s in, listen to Zbigniew Brzezinski talking to the Council on Foreign Relations last year:

As the people of the world unite, seeing the chains of labels slipping from their wrists and freeing them from bondage, there are some great celebrations of freedom and patriotism around the world.

In no place is that more special than in the United State of America:

An MP3 of Looking for America can be found free of charge on the Alex Jones website here. It's also being celebrated by the clothing company with the best radio jingle of 2010 (song by Bernie Nelson), Blue Diamond Gusset Jeans. There's a place down in Tennessee...

You know, I really think the 'anti-terrorist' bullshit was the biggest false move of the globalists. People woke up, saw the police state infrastructure, the attacks on freedoms and liberties, all because everyone was supposedly now a potential 'terrorist'...

And I think we've grown less fear of what labels people throw at us as a result. Keep hurling ridiclous labels at people to whom they do not belong - and you single-handedly difuse any other stigmatising label that could be used to influence that person's behaviour and attitudes.

This may be a bad thing - or a good thing - depending on your view. But it's devestating to the nation-state-and-freedom-hating globalists and their New World Order agenda.

Certainly, 'Little Englander' and 'patriotism' no longer feel like dirty words - especially when we can join with others, such as our cousins in the USA, and join with them in celebrating THEIR culture, identity and patriotism, too.

So, here's the challenge to England... as the battle against the New World Order continues in the minds and hearts of all still-thinking freedom lovers, can the people of England produce modern patriotic songs to the standard of Mark Wills? And can you prove it?

Let music be one of our weapons of choice as we battle to win our freedoms, liberties and nation states back from the globalists.

And let our biggest weapon always be the willingness to say 'no'. Remember, the political elites work for us - and most of them are criminal, corrupt, corporate whores, constitution defying swindlers and enemies of freedom and humanity anyway.

The whole world uniting and celebrating their cultures and friendships is far more beautiful than anything dark and evil that the globalists could ever throw in our direction.

Quote of the Day: 4th January 2011

"VAT is of course an EU required tax, and the EU draws a stated proportion of the VAT revenues from each country to support its own expanding budget."

- Conservative MP John Redwood explains the cold hard facts to the previously in the dark British public...

That's the strategy we should be using all the time, I suspect. No partisan claims - just facts like that, and let the British people make their own minds up.

Quote of the Day: 3rd January 2011

"But I have winced at times at some of the decisions the [Conservative] Party has made. The tax hikes. Ken Clarke’s justice policies. Our obsession with climate change. And most of all, underlying the whole of politics like the drum-beat in Ravel’s Bolero, the decades-long betrayal on Europe.

[On a Conservative - Fib Dem merger] So I give notice to anyone who may be interested: I will not be a member of such a mongrel party. I will not represent it in Brussels. I will not campaign for it, and I will not vote for it. And nor, I suspect, will most of the Conservatives I know."

- Conservative MEP Roger Helmer on Conservative Home

'Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength!': The sinister brainwashing unit at the heart of the Coalition exposed

I think I have just read one of the most sinister and terrifying news reports of my entire life.

It appears that the Coalition has a psychology unit sending out messages deliberately designed to achieve social engineering - and yes, they are targeting you.

The report in The Independent tells how: "Shame, vanity, laziness and the desire to fit in are all to be used as tools of Government policy by ministers acting on the advice of a new psychology unit in Whitehall."

Which is funny. I thought that they worked for us? No, it seems that you are their slaves and you will do as you are told - overtly or through sinister subliminal programming.

The report goes on to say that: "The Prime Minister, David Cameron, established the seven-strong unit in July, since when the Government has declined to divulge all its members and the full extent of its work."

Really? Errr.... we pay for it!

The news report then adds: "The unit draws inspiration from the Chicago University professor Richard H Thaler and his colleague Cass Sunstein, whose book Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness is required reading for Conservative frontbenchers."

This is a book aimed at civil servants and policy makers - a point missed by many - and it's central instruction for those presenting 'choices' for the public to make - choices that they will be led to believe that they are making for themselves - is that: "No choice is ever presented in a neutral way".

Answer? Never listen to a bloody word that the Government ever tells you. They cannot be trusted to tell you the truth or give you cold facts to make your own decisions, ever.

Now so far, we'd think most British folk are still in the dark. Hold that thought a moment. You'll see how sinister this is going to get.

Back to The Independent, which also tells how: "Professor Thaler, who advises the UK team, suggests that instead of forcing people to behave more virtuously through legislation, governments can guide them in the right direction using psychology. Ministers should become, in his jargon, "choice architects", making virtuous choices more attractive than unvirtuous ones."

So, the obvious question is who the hell are these people and on whose authority are they the judge and arbiter of what is and is not 'virtuous'..?

This is really sinister. This is Common Purpose, Neuro-Linguistic Programming tyranny.

New Labour had nothing on this. They just were party to two illegal wars, torture and extraordinary rendition, the creation of Islamist bogeymen and the promotion of a several times killed former CIA agent and friend of the Bush family as the world's most scary bogeyman of all. They were also responsible for mass immigration and the criminalisation of any questions in the minds of the British public about terrorism and profiling by race those people that the Government kept telling us relentlessly were out to destroy our way of life (when actually, the Government and the globalists were the real terrorists destroying Britishness, Englishness and our living standards and freedoms all along).

Now, let's go back to one of those names again - "The unit draws inspiration from the Chicago University professor Richard H Thaler and his colleague Cass Sunstein..."

Hardly a household name in the UK, Cass Sunstein has been widely discussed in the United States where the pro-Constitution Tea Party movement see him as an opponent.

Just so you can get up to speed with what the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are up to, here's the lowdown on Cass Sunstein - as discussed by Glenn Beck and Alex Jones.

Clearly, we're about to enter a new low chapter in the struggle for the continuance of individualism and liberty - described by Orwell with the words: "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

Sunday Paper Review: 2nd January 2011

New Year, new rant...

I don't know if you're like me, but I'm seriously beginning to suffer from cabin fever.

If this Christmas and New Year epic where all human life drags on in an endless state of near-suspension for a month goes on for much longer, where people who you know who actually *do* things with life are all off on holiday and uncontactable... I mean, I'm sure the near month long period of doing absolutely nothing is great (or hell?) if you're the ruddy Walton family or if you have the mental brain power of the average X Factor viewer, but for the rest of us who want to get on and do something meaningful in life...

And now we still have to have two more Bank Holidays? For what? To recover from the getting fat and vegetating in front of the television that most have been doing since mid-December already? Strewth...

Anyway, here's what's not happening in the world, according to the Sunday newspapers.

The Sunday Express details how: "Millions of innocent people have their details stored on police databases after reporting a crime."

We have nothing to add that hasn't already been said in the report by a spokesperson for Privacy International who is quoted as saying: "There's a point where the police stop seeing members of the public as the people to be protected and rather see them all as potential criminals. Until now, this only happened in non-democratic states, but I fear that this line has been crossed in ours."

Britain, the banana republic governed by unlawful offshore corporate governments who have been handed power in successive acts of treachery by the lawless, expenses swindlers in Parliament.

But YOU'RE the people on the database. Nice, huh?

The Independent on Sunday exposes how the Coalition Government is effectively acting to cover-up "information regarding the UK's complicity in torture and rendition flights". Information being requested by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition has not been delivered, "even though it relates to decisions made under Labour," the newspaper reports.

Well, what did you expect? We're seeing a constant pattern. Why does this country never change direction, irrespective of which party we vote into power? Answer: in part, due to the Sir Humphrey's who we do not elect and cannot get rid of - all of whom elected Ministers are seemingly utterly terrified of upsetting.

The Sunday Telegraph has a story which suggests that Labour are to team up with EU-sceptic Conservatives (all forty-odd out of over three hundred of them) in order to vote down or strengthen the European Union Bill. This is the much touted flagship policy of Call Me Dave which promises a 'referendum lock' on the further transfer of powers to Brussels. You know... the smoke and mirrors guff which isn't worth the paper that it's written on. Who'd have thought it... Labour opposing something to do with the European Union. Funny what happens in Opposition. It's like a replay of their opposition to Conservative Edward Heath's act of treachery against the nation state, all over again... until they get into power, in which event they'll betray us at every given opportunity as all three of the main parties always do.

See the note on Sir Humphrey's, as above.

Mark Pritchard MP - secretary of the backbench Conservative 1922 Committee - writes an article for the Mail on Sunday, firing a warning salvo across the bows of 'purple plotters' looking to form fait accompli electoral pacts or mergers with the Liberal Democrats.

He writes: "Over the next five years, as the European courts continue to encroach on individual freedoms, overrule our own courts and gnaw away at British parliamentary sovereignty, and as the Liberal Democrats, mostly unwittingly, inexorably steer Government policies Leftwards, hard-working and over-taxed Britons will be drawn to look for something new come the next Election..."

UKIP, anyone?

Pritchard is backed by the Mail on Sunday itself. In a strong editorial, the newspaper appears to be losing patience with David Cameron and warns that Conservative supporters have become: "...increasingly disturbed by the apparent enthusiasm with which Mr Cameron and his closest allies have seized the chance to collaborate with the Liberal Democrats."

The people over at The Observer are seemingly the only people in the world interested in anything that Ed Miliband has to say. Apparently, he wants to "reach out to Liberal Democrats" (yawn!) and will ask the people of Oldham and Saddleworth to use the by-election there as a referendum on the Coalition. He will, the newspaper reports, use a speech to say: "I urge the voters of Oldham and Saddleworth to make the government sit up and listen."

I, too, urge the people of Oldham and Saddleworth to make the government sit up and listen... by voting for UKIP's Paul Nuttall.

And finally... David Beckham and Tottenham are all over the sports pages, but The People can't be too thrilled with the English sporting hero. Why else would they chose to illustrate the story with the worst photograph of Becks of all time?

(Soon to be) Poor Estonia!

For some bizarre reason best known to their own politicians, Estonia today joined the eurozone - becoming the seventeenth 'country' to do so.

The Daily Express describes the move by noting: "ESTONIA joined the troubled eurozone today – in a move that was compared to boarding the Titanic after it hit the iceberg."

Quite.

The insanity is proclaimed by Jose Manuel Barosso who said of Estonia's eurozone accession: "It is a strong signal of the attraction and stability that the euro brings to member states of the European Union."

What planet is he on? Obviously, whatever planet he is on, it is not the same planet that is partially comprised of formerly sovereign nations known as Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

New warnings of the demise of the euro - and the negative impacts of it on we, the people - continue apace.

Yesterday, the Centre for Economic and Business Research warned that: "There is no modern history of falling living standards in peacetime on the scale necessary to keep the euro in its current form. Indeed the scale of the cuts necessary was only just achieved in wartime. That is why I think there is at best a one-in-five chance the euro will survive as it is."

The day before, credit ratings agency Moodys warned: "The amount of austerity needed to correct Europe’s imbalances may be as politically unsustainable as it was for Argentina in 2001."

And the day before that, we learned that: "HALF of all Germans want to ditch the euro and bring back their deutschmark, according to a poll."

Not that the political class give a damn about what the people who pay their wages think. They just take our taxes - giving us less for what they take and taking more and more for the privilege.

So, what on earth would the people of Estonia want to join a club like the eurozone for?

Reading up on their history, you'd have thought that a nation that had suffered Nazi occupation and illegal annexation by the USSR - a nation that had fought for independence, both economically and politically, for several post-war decades might value their freedom.

Do they not read the newspapers? Do they not read about the de facto loss of sovereignty and independence that comes with EU membership, let alone eurozone membership?

Wonder if the people of Ireland have a message they'd like to send to Estonia?

And it's Ireland that we turn to for our closing thought on Estonia.

On the Wikipedia page for the country - and I know Wikipedia is an unreliable authority - there's a delightful little line which reads: "Ireland is sometimes seen as a model for Estonian economic future."

Need we say more?

In other news, a warning was sent out on Thursday by the Institute for Public Policy Research.

It stated that immigration into the UK is unlikely to drop - due to huge influxes from the European Union.

Top of the list of those expected to swell our ranks are a "new wave of Irish migration with as many as 120,000 leaving the Republic," The Guardian reports.

It would make a refreshing change to have an influx of people we could actually have a conversation with and who wouldn't want to eradicate all traces of British culture and heritage, in my view. Can't see too many complaining about the Irish coming in. Indeed, many might well welcome it.

But, if we're getting 120,000 from Ireland, how many hundreds of thousands are we going to be getting from everywhere else in the European Union - mistakenly thinking that Britain is a land of milk and honey?

UKIP's Nigel Farage says: "David Cameron's rank dishonesty over mass migration has been blown apart by the latest figures from the Institute for Public Policy Research. The prospect of even greater migration from the EU due to the financial crisis leaves the Prime Minister's policies naked. It is a simple fact that while he remains committed to EU membership there is nothing that he can do to stop tens or hundreds of thousands coming here. We know that over the past few years a majority of new jobs have been taken by migrants. That will continue to be the case. In order to do anything about it we must leave the EU. He knows that, as do the people of Britain."

Well, the plan is clearly to make the United Kingdom indistinguishable from... say... Estonia.

Out goes local culture, custom, tradition, identity, standard of living, personal freedom, liberty, individualism...

...and in comes cheap corporate wage slaves under lowest common denominator 'equality' moves to drive up profit margins.

It's called extreme socialism - an unholy alliance between the far left and globalist corporations.

And, unfortunately, there's no room for places called 'Estonia' or people who describe themselves as 'English' in their plans.

All of us, the world over, are already under One World Government.

And we're all going to be incredibly miserable together until we all collectively challenge unlawful offshore corporate governments, to whom our local politicians are subservient 'yes men'.

Here in THIS country, we have a WRITTEN national constitution and unenforced - but thoroughly breached - treason laws.

Make honouring and seeking to uphold those your New Year's Resolutions.