Don't choke on your cornflakes: The BBC, of all people, have spotted a cigarette shaped elephant in the room

Cor blimey! Things you never thought you'd read on the BBC, of all places.

Three MPs are joining forces with campaigners to call for the smoking ban in UK pubs and clubs to be relaxed.

Conservative Greg Knight, Lib Dem John Hemming and Labour's Roger Godsiff argue that the ban has had a devastating impact on the industry.

They want the law to be changed to allow pubs to create a separate room for smokers if they choose.

Thousands of UK pubs have closed in recent years and many have blamed the ban for the loss of business.

Of all the things I never thought I'd read on the BBC, that has to be one of them.

It's all too rare that anyone wants to acknowledge the cigarette shaped elephant in the room (of the now closed down and boarded up pub)... but for the BBC to see it and say it?

Well, bugger me gently and call me Glenda.

Whatever next?

'And now, on the BBC, the wickedness of the Labour Party and the fascist origins of the European Union...'

No, hang on... too early in the morning. That last one will never happen.

After all, the BBC can't go upsetting their sponsors, can they?

The Awakening: Why the globalists and the banksters have already lost

"Capitalism and socialism are ceding ground to a grotesque new corporatism. We are back on the road to serfdom."
- Daniel Hannan

There comes a point, I think, where an idea reaches such levels of support and inspiration that a critical mass is attained. Once that level is reached, the idea becomes unstoppable.

That idea is freedom.

The banksters might think that they can keep on looting national treasuries and forcing the people into slavery under their corporate fascism.

However, enough of us now know the way they work and we are wise to the crimes that they have been committing with their funny money.

If they were to ban the internet, the newspapers and all television tomorrow, it would be too late - there are now too many of us talking about it on the street that we are already informing each other by word-of-mouth.

Corporate fascism - as imposed by the banksters - will not be able to continue to stand and to strangle the people it keeps enslaved for much longer. It is a wobbling domino, ready to fall.

The globalists - supranational government - are also ready to fall.

While the banksters and multinational corporations may will it and their puppet governments are willing to subject their people to the takeover on the promise of power and wealth, the people now know what is going on.

If they were to ban the internet, the newspapers and all television tomorrow, it would be too late - there are now too many of us talking about it on the street that we are already informing each other by word-of-mouth.

Ask the people in Athens. Ask the people in Madrid.

Even in Britain, the critical mass of 'euroscepticism' has long since been reached and no amount of indoctrination by the BBC or by large chunks of subverted academia can stop an idea whose time has come.

The people of England, certainly, want their country back. We are no longer prepared to be governed by global corporations and fake charities that have attempted to alter the nature of our country without our consent.

Go into any pub - those social places that the powers-that-be have tried relentlessly to have close down - and speak to others in there. Even the least well-read and the poorest of educated folk know that something is very remiss.

And the more those of us who have read the constitution talk - and we are doing - the more people will learn about the crimes against our country.

If they were to ban the internet, the newspapers and all television tomorrow, it would be too late - there are now too many of us talking about it on the street that we are already informing each other by word-of-mouth.

As for the House of Commons, it's death sentence was signed with the expenses scandal.

Nobody trusts them - we see them as corrupt.

Nobody trusts a manifesto - we all know that these are publications of lies.

Indeed, we could probably safely assert that the majority of people now hold our politicians and their Whitehall mandarins in nothing but contempt.

The disjoint between the people and our government is now an unbreachable chasm.

It will take change on an unprecedented scale in order for the people of England to once again be governed with our consent.

If they were to ban the internet, the newspapers and all television tomorrow, it would be too late - there are now too many of us talking about it on the street that we are already informing each other by word-of-mouth.

And then there's the crime of treason.

Okay, nobody has been prosecuted for it yet even though we could pluck any random politician of the last half century and - in half or more of the cases - point to ways in which their prosecution for treason would be reasonable.

No matter attempts to ignore the constitution of England and the treason laws allowing corrupt and dishonest, self-serving politicians to do as they will - no matter how unlawful - we, the people are now informing each other about it.

Informing our friends, neighbours, colleagues and acquaintances about the wrongs being committed by a political class which the people already hold in contempt.

If they were to ban the internet, the newspapers and all television tomorrow, it would be too late - there are now too many of us talking about it on the street that we are already informing each other by word-of-mouth.

The awakening is global and the awakening is unstoppable.

The awakening carries with it the voices and belief in the concept of freedom.

Until we, the people are able to restore our freedom, the protests all over the world are unlikely to come to an end.

The awakening is too far advanced to be bottled back up.

Pandora's Box has been opened and we have seen the crimes and the corruption perpetrated by those who would be King.

The awakening promises to cleanse us of these people and the awakening is something that finds it's time has come.

The corporate fascism that has held the people in slavery and misery is the biggest evil domino ready to fall.

So, if the Met Police or Boris are reading, does the London LGBT community get protected from extremists?

Our friends over at Radio Free Britain have commendably picked up on a story from The Telegraph, written by Andrew Gilligan.

In it, Gilligan writes: "The day after tomorrow, 29 June, [the East London Mosque] welcomes to its premises an organisation called Sex and Relationship Education Islamic (SRE Islamic), one of whose main purposes is to campaign for “the unacceptability of homosexuality which is often portrayed as a lifestyle choice.” That’s a quote from the first sentence of SRE Islamic’s statement of values."

He goes on to explain that: "SRE Islamic is run by members of Hizb ut Tahrir, a racist and extremist group which believes that Muslims should not mix with non-Muslims."

Now, as we all know, in this politically correct era, one must be very careful about saying what one thinks for fear of 'offending'.

Against that, as a conservative libertarian, this blog author is very much in favour of free speech and would defend people's right to it to the hilt.

However, there are boundaries and it would seem to me that the story Gilligan highlights seems to be perilously close to crossing one.

One would therefore hope that there will be a Metropolitan Police presence at this event and that any hate speech directed at the LGBT community will be met with arrest and prosecution.

Certainly, one would also hope that the vast majority of sensible people would support the LGBT community and ensure that hate speech against the LGBT community has no place in Britain.

If the LGBT community can't be protected against things like this, then they should just dismantle all laws designed to prevent inciteful hate speech and let us all say as we think.

That, else every lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered person in Britain will be left with no choice but to join the English Defence League. Yes, even the Scots.

We post this knowing that our intense dislike of all things 'European Union' could lead to us facing death by hanging. Which is a rather medieval, brutal form of punishment, straight out of the Stone Age for it's barbarism, really.

Now, the Spanish 'indignants' aren't just protesting as all protest marches lead to Madrid

The long-suffering people of Greece have had their fair share of alternative and - eventually - mainstream media coverage over the last few weeks.

While their fate remains in limbo and their EU-shackled misery continues to punish the people without mercy...

...the people of Spain are now cranking up their own pressure for change.

The European Revolution website - claiming that it is under constant attack from DNS and hack attempts - reports that: "The 15M movement has started multiple long marches from all over Spain towards Madrid, the country’s capital, geographic heart and epicentre of the current participatory democracy movement. The Eastern route from Valencia is over 500kms long and started on the June 20th. In 34 days it will pass through 29 towns and cities, where they will hold many ‘Popular Assemblies’ to explain the movement and listen to peoples demands. Yesterday the second long march began, with over 100 protesters setting off from Barcelona."

It adds: "More marches are being planned, with one coming from La Rioja in the North, and others from Galicia in the West and Andalucía in the South. The idea is for all of the different marches to arrive in Madrid on the 23rd of July for a massive meeting of the people of Spain and to then present a list of demands to the parliament. These demands currently included the reform of the electoral law, removal of corrupt politicians from electoral list and a more participatory democracy."

The full story can be found HERE, provided they can keep their website running in the face of attempts by the undemocratic to try and keep the people's spirit down.

Quote of the Day: Cover-Up of a Royal Murder edition

"What the British press writes does not greatly matter, because over the next few months, people all around the world will have the chance to see the film, and to form their own judgements. Everywhere except Britain, that is, because as things stand, I am legally prevented from screening the film in the UK.

That's not primarily because of fears about libel, as has been suggested by some journalists (although much of the information that we have unearthed about Prince Philip will shock many viewers), but because my film has been deemed by lawyers to be in contempt of court, since it openly questions the impartiality of a coroner who had sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen, yet was sitting in the Royal Courts of Justice, presiding over a case that involved the monarchy.

Furthermore, it dares to look at why he repeatedly refused to call senior members of the royal family to the inquest, despite Diana having written a sworn note explicitly stating that her husband was planning an "accident" to her car (a note, incidentally, which the Metropolitan Police did not reveal to the press and public for six years, or the French police who first investigated the crash). Saying this explicitly is, it seems, against the law."

- Keith Allen, writing in The Independent about his Diana documentary film Unlawful Killing, opening at cinemas all across the world soon. Except in Britain.

Are you reading, Dave 'Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire' Cameron?

Delighted to see that The Independent has a leader that, in many places, we disagree with strongly BUT one which follows in agreement with a post that this blog made yesterday.

Yesterday, we called David Cameron and his cronies liars for claiming that Britain would not contribute to a second Greek bailout. We are doing, through the IMF.

And today, one day behind The Talking Clock, The Independent calls Cameron a duplicitous liar for the same reason.

We, the people are now either fully awake - or, at least, getting there. We can't be fooled by these pathetic games of wordsmith-ing anymore.

So, could those U.S. I.P. logs that seem to watch everything this blog posts take note? This blog ain't saying nothing that the British people aren't saying and which - occasionally - some of our politicians and media finally decide to say.

We just tell it like it is from the off.

H/T: Witterings From Witney

Funeral for a non-friend: UKIP 'buries' the Euro

A sad event took place today.

But what was a sombre occasion for the European leaders... was the first rite of a joyous celebration for the PEOPLE of European nation states.

In one of their more outrageous stunts so far, UKIP staged a funeral procession for the euro currency in Brussels:

"Completely wrong and mad," says Nigel Farage. More from the UKIP team here.

Daniel Hannan - the Conservative MEP who remains in the wrong party - has also been reading out the passing sentence on the Euro today; attacking the elite for their crimes against the people of Europe.

He writes: "The eurozone bailouts are, in essence, another transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich. As this blog never tires of pointing out, the bailout money isn’t going to the people of Greece, Ireland or Portugal; it is going to bankers and bondholders who made bad investments. The repayment, however, will indeed come from the people of these unhappy lands. No wonder they are out on the streets."

Meanwhile, Tony Blair - friend of the banksters and our former Prime Minister - has been preaching from the pulpit of europhiles that is the BBC. Blair has been telling the EU-funded leftist 'news' organisation that Britain could still JOIN the euro.

And we'd be insane to do so, clearly.

Still, we do have a whole new word for the love of the euro and the European project today...

...necrophilia.

See also:
Martin Kettle in The Guardian - Greece, Schengen, Nato – it's time to admit the European dream is over

'Unlawful Killing': New preview of Diana documentary film released

...she won't go quietly.

Even a heavily handicapped inquest jury ruled that she was the victim of unlawful killing.

And she was OUR Princess.

Nothing! Nowt! Zero! Zilch! Zip! Errrr.... billions, actually.

All of the mainstream media is announcing through the headlines news of a great Cameron 'victory' to save the British taxpayer from demands to bailout Greece (again).

And how insulting to everybody's intelligence this all is.

Keeping in mind that the Government recently almost doubled the vast number of billions that we give to the International Mafia Fund (IMF), let's look at some of the HEADLINES and then look at the lines buried further away in the reports.

BBC NEWS
HEADLINE: Cameron 'wins fight' to limit aid UK will give Greece
THE BURIED TRUTH: "With a second bail-out due in the autumn, there had been a suggestion cash from EU-wide funds may be used. This will now not happen, but the UK will still contribute via the IMF."

Sky News
HEADLINE: Greece Bailout: Britain Will Not Have To Pay
THE BURIED TRUTH: "Although Britain will be kept out of the second aid programme, it will contribute about one billion euros in loan guarantees through its membership of the International Monetary Fund."

Daily Telegraph
HEADLINE: No British cash to bail out Greece, says David Cameron
SUB-HEADLINE: David Cameron has won the battle to prevent British taxpayers’ money being used to bail out Greece.
THE BURIED TRUTH: [Completely absent]

The Guardian:
HEADLINE: Greece granted €120bn EU bailout
SUB-HEADLINE: EU leaders accepted David Cameron's argument that the cost should be borne by those using the single currency
THE BURIED TRUTH: "Cameron reiterated his refusal to take part in the latest Greek bailout except through Britain's contributions to the IMF."

Despite the headlines, make no mistake. We ARE bailing out Greece again. We're doing it through the IMF, an organisation to which we just DOUBLED our multi-billion pound contributions.

At best, we don't have journalists - nor even reporters. We have repeaters, churning out headlines copied and pasted from official Downing Street memos; endorsed - no doubt - by the European Union.

All of it designed to keep the masses who inform themselves through headlines alone that all is well...

Quote of the Day: 23rd June 2011

"The brutal truth remains that Britain has committed twice as much to the eurozone bailouts as it has saved through all the domestic spending cuts put together. It has done so illegally and – which is almost worse – uselessly."

- Daniel Hannan

Dan the Man keeps correctly and succinctly identifying the problem and calling it what it is... but he still remains part of the governing party that keeps going along with it all.

Wonder how our Bilderberg attending Chancellor is today?

Quote of the Day: 'Greece, who loses really?' edition

"In reality, the losers would be the bulk of the continental European elite, which has hitched its wagon to a "falling star" -- a "black hole" would express it better -- since the early 1990s. This elite would be shown up for the arrogant blunderers they have always looked like, and have proved to be. Pride, guilt and fear are some of the most powerful motivations on earth -- hence the resistance to shrinking or dissolving EMU."

- Charles Dumas of Lombard Street Research cited by Mary Ellen Synon in her blog at the Daily Mail

When even a mainstream newspaper publishes viewpoints from economists who are pointing their fingers at the 'elite', then it really is time to say "you 'conspiracy theorists' were right all along! And now everybody knows it!"

Though we would still add the word "evil" to Dumas's list of adjectives. For a start.

Meanwhile, Call Me Dave ends up sounding like a demonic lunatic in a report from the BBC. Not that he needs much help.

They start an article with the paragraph: "The eurozone will not be allowed to collapse, David Cameron has said, since the countries using the single currency have so much "invested in it"."

Where to start responding to that..?

Besides: "Told you so"..?

Quote of the Day: 20th June 2011

"...will the Minister not recognise that there is now a mood change in Europe? Der Spiegel, the German magazine has had a cover story contemplating the end of the euro as we now know it, and Mr Charles Grant, the well known europhile, has done the same in The Times today. Instead of sheltering behind complacent language and weasel words that we should not speculate, the Government should recognise that this eurozone cannot last. It is the responsibility of the British Government to be open with the British people now about the alternative prospects. Since the euro in its current form is going to collapse, is it not better that that happens quickly rather than it dying a slow death?"

- Jack Straw

Cor blimey. If someone from the former treacherous frontbenches of the Labour Party is sounding the death knell of the eurozone, things must be bad.

Quick! Abandon ship!

No, hang on a minute! That's not going to happen. From the same House of Commons emergency debate as our quote of the day, here's Dennis Skinner:

"Does the Minister recall that when the Tories and Liberals were in opposition and sat over here on the Opposition Benches, the Tories wanted to see the collapse of the eurozone, but the Liberal Democrats thought the opposite and wanted to prop it up? Here we are today with a great opportunity to see the back-end of the euro, and I can only reach the conclusion, based upon his complacent answers, that the Lib Dems are running the coalition."

So there we go. Two bits of soundbite from the Labour benches. Let this blog not be accused of being politically biased.

Of course, we still hate and despise the Labour Party. And despite the above two quotes, you too can once more return to hating the Labour Party by spending two minutes reading this.

See also:
Daily Express - £100BN WIPED OFF OUR SHARES

Boris Johnson says what Bilderberg-attending Chancellor Osborne won't...

Really good piece of analysis in the Daily Telegraph from Mayor of London, Boris Johnson.

We like Boris. Okay, he's semi-bought into that Marxism-through-Greeny nonsense, but get part of his analysis on the Greek tragedy:

"The idea is that Germany, France and others should “socialise” the debts of the periphery - take them on, in other words - so as to keep the eurozone together and to stop the domino effect, with all the attendant damage it is feared that would do to the European banking system.

These profligate and improvident countries would be obliged, in return, to submit to a kind of economic supervision that is now proposed for Greece. Taxes, spending, benefits - all the panoply of economic independence - would then be subject to agreement with Berlin and Brussels. I sometimes think Kohl, Mitterrand, Delors and co instinctively knew that this would happen.

They probably calculated that if only they could achieve monetary union, the euro would create such strains that the de facto creation of a United States of Europe would be impossible to resist. The trouble is that there is just no democratic mandate for anything of the kind."

You should read the full piece. And then weep.

Weep that the Conservatives gave us David Cameron and George Osborne (Bilderberg)...

...rather than Boris Johnson.

UPDATE at 14:46:

Daniel Hannan is also staying on the topic of Greece, paying reference to Boris's very well received piece.

Hannan writes:

"We now think it extraordinary that, in ancien régime Europe, the nobility had exemption from taxes. How, we ask ourselves, could a system have been designed in which the fiscal burden fell only on the poor? Yet we have now come up with precisely the same racket, as European bankers and bondholders shuffle off their liabilities on to the taxpayer."

This should be causing major headaches for the Conservative Party. When big hitters like Boris Johnson speak out and find themselves applauded, when they are backed by politicians who represent the type of Conservative Party the voters (mistakenly) think they are voting for, a real democratic leader might start realising that it was they who were 'off-message'...

...but will Cameron do anything? Will he 'eck as like.

The betrayal of Britain must continue without end. Their gold plated pensions from their bankster bosses depend on it.

Quote of the Day: 19th June 2011

"Please try to understand that the House of Lords is not a benign assembly of Nobel laureates, successful generals and the odd patriotic earl. Such people may be found there, but they have been swamped in recent years by the committee-sitters and placemen, the public sector princelings and quangocrats, who embody the way in which power in Britain – as in Brussels – is concentrated in the hands of an appointed apparat. If you’re happy with such a system, fine. But at least recognise it for what it is."

- Daniel Hannan

Sunday Paper Review: 19th June 2011

If you're a first time visitor to this blog and just stumbled in, then a very warm welcome. The analysis you are about to read may be dismissed by some as the ravings of a conspiracy theorist. This blog doesn't have a problem with that, well aware that the awakening amongst people as to what is really going on has become unstoppable now. If you've not fully realised the great deceptions yet, that's not your fault. You were meant to not notice. So now read, stop, think, and start putting things together and it will soon all make sense.

Normally, we start our paper review on a Sunday by looking at the biggest story we can find first - but we're going to build up to the climax this week.

We start the foreplay with a claim from the Mail on Sunday that David Cameron's chief policy adviser now wants us to quit the European Empire.

The health hazard that we'd attach is that the Daily Mail constantly seeks to reassure Conservative voters that Call Me Dave really is EU-sceptic, rather than a spineless Brussels place man.

However, if this story about Downing Street's Director of Strategy Steve Hilton is correct, this UKIP supporting blog would happily welcome him to the same patriotic team - irrespective of the colour of his rosette. We wish him well in any attempt he may make to rid us of the corrupt Bilderberg-ers and others of traitorous persuasions who have seized control of our Parliament and civil service; subverting our constitution in order to feather their own nests and quench their thirst for power.

Speaking of which, the Independent on Sunday has bad news for any traitorous Europhiles in Government who intend giving British taxpayers money to banksters making life a misery for the people of Greece.

It reports that: "Greece could still default on its debts "within months", according to economists, even as the European Union works on a second bailout of the protest-hit nation."

So, knowing that, wake up and watch carefully what happens. If they are still going to fleece us for many billions in order to 'bailout Greece' (in other words, making sure banksters don't lose any of their invented money), then there's an agenda at play.

Why, knowing that it is futile, would they still want to loot the British Treasury? Question... if you're taking nation states down one by one, don't you have to set up a few chess moves first?

I put it to you that this is all by design. All calculated, all deliberate, and all intended to drive us towards global government. Just think about that for one second.

Think about everything that you've seen playing out over the last decade - the phony wars, the police state, the fragmentation of communities, the drive to de-industrialise developed nations under a pretext... can you spot a pattern emerging?

The Sunday Telegraph is putting out some half-way decent reporting on matters related to Greece and the Eurozone. In one report, the broadsheet reveals that: "UK banks have pulled billions of pounds of funding from the eurozone as fears grow about the impact of a “Lehman-style” event connected to a Greek default".

Now, if you've been paying attention, you'll now understand that all of this 'money' is fictional. None of it ever existed, is backed by nothing, and is just numbers generated on a computer. It's the biggest scam in the history of mankind. Yes, even bigger than 'man made global warming', probably.

How sad then, that it has led to events highlighted in the other report from the Sunday Telegraph in which one branch of the British mainstream media kindly tells us what we've all been watching on RT for months. In what is actually a fascinating read, the article concerned tells us how: "While Molotov cocktails burn on Athens’ streets, more vitriolic battles yet are blazing over Greece’s debt crisis behind the scenes, as financial markets and eurozone politicians fight their ground."

The report doesn't quite attain Max Keiser's level of frank honesty and analysis, but it's certainly above par for a British newspaper these days, for those looking for some understanding of what is unfolding.

Those of us with even a vague interest in current affairs and an inquisitive mind enough to seek out deeper analysis and viewpoints all know what's going on here now - a load a greedy banksters are attempting to buy up Greek national assets for pennies on the dollar, to destroy the last vestiges of Greek national sovereignty on the road to condensing the number of hands on power to an ever smaller number of elite few.

The Observer carries the views of one of the Greek protesters in it's report which shows that the Greek people clearly now understand what's going on. The man, a pensioner, is quoted as saying: "We are the silent majority who are sick of the corrupt people who have ruled this country for far too long." Warning of the preparedness of Greek people to face death and bloodshed to save their country, he adds: "Our creditors, the EU and IMF, have basically told Greece 'sell everything, let foreigners run your ministries, give up your wealth'. It's outrageous."

This is the road map towards global government, where we all become slaves to a corporate banking elite with some very sinister ideologies possibly at play.

As Keiser stated midweek, Greece is Ground Zero and every man and woman on the planet who cares about freedom, liberty and democracy must pray for the victory of the Greek people and for the survival of the Greek nation state. It may sound like a polemic, but this is what the elite have been building towards for generations. We are, indeed, watching the end game.

And finally... a good couple of years after UKIP got on the case, the Labour-supporting Sunday Mirror launches it's bid to save the Great British Pub, decimated following Labour's smoking ban. Guess which cigarette shaped elephant in the room they don't mention in their intro launch piece? It is, at least, mentioned in passing here.

An Englishman's rights to buy a packet of ciggies trampled on.... by a bloke called Neuberger

Some bloke with the title of 'Master of the Rolls' (not to be confused with the Lord of the Cheese Baps) isn't going to be popular with freeborn Englishmen who enjoy having a cigarette.

This is the story that cigarette vending machines are to be banned from pubs, despite an appeal by Wolverhampton based vending machine company Sinclair Collis.

Well publicans and landlords, at least Sinclair Collis tried to prevent yet another step towards having you all close down.

But how funny... an Englishman's free rights and liberties being further trampled upon by a guy named 'Neuberger'.

Good old, traditional English name, Neuberger, huh?

Say no more. Except to watch this one. He's got his eyes on free speech on the internet...

Oh, and he's yet another one of these people in positions of power who list Rothschild as an employer.

Anything left in life that isn't banned or subject to some silly statute or another?

I think that I'm soon going to turn to a life of crime. Not deliberately, you understand. Simply because there's probably three hundred crimes I commit just through getting out of bed and putting my slippers on. A life of crime is now unavoidable.

The state of play: Britain today

Banks were bailed out with trillions, countries have been bailed out all over the place with billions, we pay billions to be part of the European Union that we all loathe and want no part of, we donate billions in international aid to countries with space programs and their own armies, we're spending billions on wars that the public are opposed to, we're spending billions due to the invented fraud of 'man made global warming'...

...we're spending billions in interest for money that we've borrowed to lend to everyone else.

Meanwhile, public services are cut at home, old people are dying because they can't afford to heat their homes or feed themselves, standards of living are falling, the retirement age is rising, our foreign owned infrastructure is crumbling, our energy supplies are not secure, we have no national defences but instead share them with the French, our politics are broken with most of our laws being dictated, our elected representatives who listen are a tiny minority - the majority have been embroiled in expenses fraud and corruption...

While all this goes on, we have Nick Clegg - fresh from the EU - who has hundreds of millions spent on the referendum he wanted while the public can't have a say on the European Union; Nick Clegg who wants to dismantle the House of Lords (though considering their actions on the European Union, we might grant him that one after all); a Chancellor attending the Bilderberg meeting which we're told does not exist and, even if it does, we shouldn't look at that (even though Mandelson is swanning around at the same thing); we've have three or four MPs and a couple of Lords jailed for expenses fraud with the cases never ending...

We have newspaper vendors bludgeoned to death but it's nobody's fault, Brazilian electricians shot dead in error but we'll learn from our mistakes, Iraqi weapons inspectors who honestly committed suicide with a teaspoon and a packet of crisps - honest - as we'll find out in seventy years time when the detail stops being secret...

...do stop me when I get any part of this wrong, won't you?

So, we're doubling our contribution to the IMF to £20 billion so that a few banksters don't lose any of their multi-million pound bonuses and the people of European (former) nation states get to suffer instead. The surprise in that is where, exactly?

Millions. Billions. Trillions. Would sir care for a few more noughts on the end of that?

The only surprise is that the British people would still rather watch The X Factor rather than doing anything about it.

Must be the fluoride in the water working nicely.

Greek Bid to Jail Banksters for "financial terrorism" and "orchestrated fraud" against the people

Alex Jones chats with Max Keiser who is with a Greek Parliamentarian and specialist economic lawyer, talking about efforts to jail the globalist banksters for crimes against the Greek nation state and her people:

Paying 22.9% to borrow your OWN money? Why don't we all default on our debt?

So, I have to confess... I have a credit card. With a debt amount outstanding on it.

Save the lectures - I know all about it.

...but at least I didn't stage the Olympics and build a few new stadiums acquiring my debt.

Now, I am quite certain that the amount the bank claims is 'debt' is an invented sum which never existed. I am confident that I have more than repaid the value of all goods and services obtained through the use of the product.

Anyway, the credit card is held with Lloyds TSB - the bank that was bailed out with many, many, many billions of British taxpayers money.

So, I've repaid them the value of everything that I've ever acquired through using their product - and then some! - yet still they want more money from me...

...quite apart from the money that they have taken from The Treasury (keeping in mind that I am an Englishman and my family tree has been traced back hundreds of years as never being anything other than English).

Add to that the increases in our taxes and the cutting of our public services in order to finance bailing out banks... amongst other things.

So, my view is that Lloyds TSB owe me far more than I owe it.

With this in mind, Lloyds TSB want me to repay them 22.90% in order to 'lend' me a small portion of my own money back.

What? When the Bank of England base rate is 0.5% and has been for the longest time?

Well, you know what?

I've struggled to pay them this extortionate sum for the longest time.

It's time that they struggled and paid me back the money that they took from The Treasury.

They want me to pay them 22.90% for the privilege of lending me my own money?

Not bad! Any other firm that was as technically bankrupt as they are wouldn't be allowed to trade.

Well anyway, I think I'm a sovereign and I think I'm going to default.

Yes, it's a sovereign default. Just like Greece is about to do.

Lloyds TSB can see me in court.

What they gonna do? Make the bailiffs repossess my Céline Dion CDs..?

Oooh, I'm scared.

Protesters claim agent provocateurs used as the Greek tragedy descends into rioting

As ever these days, we turn for coverage of things that matter to the PEOPLE of European NATIONS; not to the EU-complicit BBC... but to a Russian news broadcaster.

Here's the latest on the never ending, always descending Greek tragedy from RT:

Getting back on form, it seems, UKIP's leader Nigel Farage has seemingly become the voice of the PEOPLE of Europe - and here he is unequivocal in his condemnation of banksters and globalist politicians... note that we have to use RT as a source to hear from him:

Meanwhile, the Bilderbergers who have seized control of our Parliament tried to sneak the looting of £19.7 Billion of UK taxpayer's money out without any debate. Sadly for them, Douglas Carswell MP spotted the plot. Daniel Hannan MEP places his disgust in a historical context. Not even the BBC were able to ignore this one.

See also:
Calling England - Holiday At Home This Year
UKK41 - Propaganda by ommission
Independent Political Bloggers - What happens when Greece defaults
EU Referendum - Revolting Greeks ... again
Evening Standard - Greek fury over deeper cuts vote
The Slog - CRASH2: It’s here, and The Slog will be recording it
Gerald Celente - Collapse: It's Coming

Quote of the Day: 15th June 2011

"We have absolutely no business complying with any demand of the European Parliament. They have no status whatsoever."

- Bill Cash MP

...couldn't agree more.

And as we keep on saying, under our constitution of England, every single signature on every single European Union piece of legislation or treaty... null and void. And so it will remain, for always.

Ever wondered why they keep trying to convince you that England does not have a written constitution (which bizarrely we can all read and cite from and see in libraries and museums)..?

England, know your law: Magna Carta, 796 years old today

Today is the 796th anniversary of one of the key pillars of the REAL laws of England.

Yes, this is Magna Carta. Magna Carta is supreme and beyond the reach of those treacherous scumbags who, on the whole, form our Parliament.

Readers are reminded and requested to pay particular attention to article 61, otherwise known as the 'security' clause.

Article 61 was invoked by a Baron's Committee in 2001 in response to the signing of the Lisbon Treaty. The state of our country, as outlined in article 61, has not yet been revoked by any of the Barons concerned. For more, go look around Captain Ranty - amongst others. Such as the British Constitution Group. Or the Magna Carta Society.

I couldn't care less how many random pages of this blog are pinged by spookville... the laws of England are all this blog advocates. Uphold the ruddy things. Kick out the traitors and respect the ancient laws and liberties of the English.

Hardly radical, is it?

For now then, here it is - in all it's 796 year majestic glory.... the real laws of England. Magna Carta:

Magna Carta

The Great Charter of English liberty granted (under considerable duress) by King John at Runnymede on June 15, 1215

John, by the grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, greeting.

Know that before God, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household, Brother Aymeric master of the Knights of the Temple in England, William Marshal, earl of Pembroke, William earl of Salisbury, William earl of Warren, William earl of Arundel, Alan de Galloway constable of Scotland, Warin Fitz Gerald, Peter Fitz Herbert, Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou, Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip Daubeny, Robert de Roppeley, John Marshal, John Fitz Hugh, and other loyal subjects:

1. First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity. We have also granted to all free men of our realm, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:

2. If any earl, baron, or other person that holds lands directly of the Crown, for military service, shall die, and at his death his heir shall be of full age and owe a `relief', the heir shall have his inheritance on payment of the ancient scale of `relief'. That is to say, the heir or heirs of an earl shall pay for the entire earl's barony, the heir or heirs of a knight l00s. at most for the entire knight's `fee', and any man that owes less shall pay less, in accordance with the ancient usage of `fees'

3. But if the heir of such a person is under age and a ward, when he comes of age he shall have his inheritance without `relief' or fine.

4. The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services. He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property. If we have given the guardianship of the land to a sheriff, or to any person answerable to us for the revenues, and he commits destruction or damage, we will exact compensation from him, and the land shall be entrusted to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be answerable to us for the revenues, or to the person to whom we have assigned them. If we have given or sold to anyone the guardianship of such land, and he causes destruction or damage, he shall lose the guardianship of it, and it shall be handed over to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be similarly answerable to us.

5. For so long as a guardian has guardianship of such land, he shall maintain the houses, parks, fish preserves, ponds, mills, and everything else pertaining to it, from the revenues of the land itself. When the heir comes of age, he shall restore the whole land to him, stocked with plough teams and such implements of husbandry as the season demands and the revenues from the land can reasonably bear.

6. Heirs may be given in marriage, but not to someone of lower social standing. Before a marriage takes place, it shall be' made known to the heir's next-of-kin.

7. At her husband's death, a widow may have her marriage portion and inheritance at once and without trouble. She shall pay nothing for her dower, marriage portion, or any inheritance that she and her husband held jointly on the day of his death. She may remain in her husband's house for forty days after his death, and within this period her dower shall be assigned to her.

8. No widow shall be compelled to marry, so long as she wishes to remain without a husband. But she must give security that she will not marry without royal consent, if she holds her lands of the Crown, or without the consent of whatever other lord she may hold them of.

9. Neither we nor our officials will seize any land or rent in payment of a debt, so long as the debtor has movable goods sufficient to discharge the debt. A debtor's sureties shall not be distrained upon so long as the debtor himself can discharge his debt. If, for lack of means, the debtor is unable to discharge his debt, his sureties shall be answerable for it. If they so desire, they may have the debtor's lands and rents until they have received satisfaction for the debt that they paid for him, unless the debtor can show that he has settled his obligations to them.

10. If anyone who has borrowed a sum of money from Jews dies before the debt has been repaid, his heir shall pay no interest on the debt for so long as he remains under age, irrespective of whom he holds his lands. If such a debt falls into the hands of the Crown, it will take nothing except the principal sum specified in the bond.

11. If a man dies owing money to Jews, his wife may have her dower and pay nothing towards the debt from it. If he leaves children that are under age, their needs may also be provided for on a scale appropriate to the size of his holding of lands. The debt is to be paid out of the residue, reserving the service due to his feudal lords. Debts owed to persons other than Jews are to be dealt with similarly.

12. No `scutage' or `aid' may be levied in our kingdom without its general consent, unless it is for the ransom of our person, to make our eldest son a knight, and (once) to marry our eldest daughter. For these purposes ouly a reasonable `aid' may be levied. `Aids' from the city of London are to be treated similarly.

13. The city of London shall enjoy all its ancient liberties and free customs, both by land and by water. We also will and grant that all other cities, boroughs, towns, and ports shall enjoy all their liberties and free customs.

14. To obtain the general consent of the realm for the assessment of an `aid' - except in the three cases specified above - or a `scutage', we will cause the archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, and greater barons to be summoned individually by letter. To those who hold lands directly of us we will cause a general summons to be issued, through the sheriffs and other officials, to come together on a fixed day (of which at least forty days notice shall be given) and at a fixed place. In all letters of summons, the cause of the summons will be stated. When a summons has been issued, the business appointed for the day shall go forward in accordance with the resolution of those present, even if not all those who were summoned have appeared.

15. In future we will allow no one to levy an `aid' from his free men, except to ransom his person, to make his eldest son a knight, and (once) to marry his eldest daughter. For these purposes only a reasonable `aid' may be levied.

16. No man shall be forced to perform more service for a knight's `fee', or other free holding of land, than is due from it.

17. Ordinary lawsuits shall not follow the royal court around, but shall be held in a fixed place.

18. Inquests of novel disseisin, mort d'ancestor, and darrein presentment shall be taken only in their proper county court. We ourselves, or in our absence abroad our chief justice, will send two justices to each county four times a year, and these justices, with four knights of the county elected by the county itself, shall hold the assizes in the county court, on the day and in the place where the court meets.

19. If any assizes cannot be taken on the day of the county court, as many knights and freeholders shall afterwards remain behind, of those who have attended the court, as will suffice for the administration of justice, having regard to the volume of business to be done.

20. For a trivial offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood. In the same way, a merchant shall be spared his merchandise, and a husbandman the implements of his husbandry, if they fall upon the mercy of a royal court. None of these fines shall be imposed except by the assessment on oath of reputable men of the neighbourhood.

21. Earls and barons shall not be amerced save through their peers, and only according to the measure of the offence.

22. No clerk shall be amerced for his lay tenement ecept according to the manner of the other persons aforesaid; and not according to the amount of his ecclesiastical benefice.

23. Neither a town nor a man shall be forced to make bridges over the rivers, with the exception of those who, from of old and of right ought to do it.

24. No sheriff, constable, coroners, or other bailiffs of ours shall hold the pleas of our crown.

25. All counties, hundreds, wapentakes, and trithings--our demesne manors being exccepted--shall continue according to the old farms, without any increase at all.

26. If any one holding from us a lay fee shall die, and our sheriff or bailiff can show our letters patent containing our summons for the debt which the dead man owed to us,--our sheriff or bailiff may be allowed to attach and enroll the chattels of the dead man to the value of that debt, through view of lawful men; in such way, however, that nothing shall be removed thence until the debt is paid which was plainly owed to us. And the residue shall be left to the executors that they may carry out the will of the dead man. And if nothing is owed to us by him, all the chattels shall go to the use prescribed by the deceased, saving their reasonable portions to his wife and children.

27. If any freeman shall have died intestate his chattels shall be distributed through the hands of his near relatives and friends, by view of the church; saving to any one the debts which the dead man owed him.

28. No constable or other bailiff of ours shall take the corn or other chattels of any one except he straightway give money for them, or can be allowed a respite in that regard by the will of the seller.

29. No constable shall force any knight to pay money for castleward if he be willing to perform that ward in person, or--he for a reasonable cause not being able to perform it himself--through another proper man. And if we shall have led or sent him on a military expedition, he shall be quit of ward according to the amount of time during which, through us, he shall have been in military service.

30. No sheriff nor bailiff of ours, nor any one else, shall take the horses or carts of any freeman for transport, unless by the will of that freeman.

31. Neither we nor our bailiffs shall take another's wood for castles or for other private uses, unless by the will of him to whom the wood belongs.

32. We shall not hold the lands of those convicted of felony longer than a year and a day; and then the lands shall be restored to the lords of the fiefs.

33. Henceforth all the weirs in the Thames and Medway, and throughout all England, save on the sea-coast, shall be done away with entirely.

34. Henceforth the writ which is called Praecipe shall not be to served on any one for any holding so as to cause a free man to lose his court.

35. There shall be one measure of wine throughout our whole realm, and one measure of ale and one measure of corn--namely, the London quart;--and one width of dyed and russet and hauberk cloths--namely, two ells below the selvage. And with weights, moreover, it shall be as with measures.

36. Henceforth nothing shall be given or taken for a writ of inquest in a matter concerning life or limb; but it shall be conceded gratis, and shall not be denied.

37. If any one hold of us in fee-farm, or in socage, or in burkage, and hold land of another by military service, we shall not, by reason of that fee-farm, or socage, or burkage, have the wardship of his heir or of his land which is held in fee from another. Nor shall we have the wardship of that fee-farm, or socage, or burkage unless that fee-farm owe military service. We shall not, by reason of some petit-serjeanty which some one holds of us through the service of giving us knives or arrows or the like, have the wardship of his heir or of the land which he holds of another by military service.

38. No bailiff, on his own simple assertion, shall henceforth any one to his law, without producing faithful witnesses in evidence.

39. No freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way harmed--nor will we go upon or send upon him--save by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.

40. To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.

41. All merchants may safely and securely go out of England, and come into England, and delay and pass through England, as well by land as by water, for the purpose of buying and selling, free from all evil taxes, subject to the ancient and right customs--save in time of war, and if they are of the land at war against us. And if such be found in our land at the beginning of the war, they shall be held, without harm to their bodies and goods, until it shall be known to us or our chief justice how the merchants of our land are to be treated who shall, at that time, be found in the land at war against us. And if ours shall be safe there, the others shall be safe in our land.

42. Henceforth any person, saving fealty to us, may go out of our realm and return to it, safely and securely, by land and by water, except perhaps for a brief period in time of war, for the common good of the realm. But prisoners and outlaws are excepted according to the law of the realm; also people of a land at war against us, and the merchants, with regard to whom shall be done as we have said.

43. If any one hold from any escheat--as from the honour of Walingford, Nottingham, Boloin, Lancaster, or the other escheats which are in our hands and are baronies--and shall die, his heir shall not give another relief, nor shall he perform for us other service than he would perform for a baron if that barony were in the hand of a baron; and we shall hold it in the same way in which the baron has held it.

44. Persons dwelling without the forest shall not henceforth come before the forest justices, through common summonses, unless they are impleaded or are the sponsors of some person or persons attached for matters concerning the forest.

45. We will not make men justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs unless they are such as know the law of the realm, and are minded to observe it rightly.

46. All barons who have founded abbeys for which they have charters of the king of England, or ancient right of tenure, shall have, as they ought to have, their custody when vacant.

47- A11 forests constituted as such in our time shall straightway be annulled; and the same shall be done for river banks made into places of defence by us in our time.

48. A11 evil customs concerning forests and warrens, and concerning foresters and warreners, sheriffs and their servants, river banks and their guardians, shall straightway be inquired into each county, through twelve sworn knights from that county, and shall be eradicated by them, entirely, so that they shall never be renewed, within forty days after the inquest has been made; in such manner that we shall first know about them, or our justice if we be not in England.

49. We shall straightway return all hostages and charters which were delivered to us by Englishmen as a surety for peace or faithful service.

50. We shall entirey remove from their bailwicks the relatives of Gerard de Athyes, so that they shall henceforth have no bailwick in England: Engelard de Cygnes, Andrew Peter and Gyon de Chanceles, Gyon de Cygnes, Geoffrey de Martin and his brothers, Philip Mark and his brothers, and Geoffrey his nephew, and the whole following of them.

51. And straightway after peace is restored we shall remove from the realm all the foreign soldiers, crossbowmen, servants, hirelings, who may have come with horses and arms to the harm of the realm.

52. If any one shall have been disseized by us, or removed, without a legal sentence of his peers, from his lands, castles, liberties or lawful right, we shall straightway restore them to him. And if a dispute shall arise concerning this matter it shall be settled according to the judgment of the twenty-five barons who are mentioned below as sureties for the peace. But with regard to all those things of which any one was, by king Henry our father or king Richard our brother, disseized or dispossessed without legal judgment of his peers, which we have in our hand or which others hold, and for which we ought to give a guarantee: We shall have respite until the common term for crusaders. Except with regard to those concerning which a plea was moved, or an inquest made by our order, before we took the cross. But when we return from our pilgrimage, or if, by chance, we desist from our pilgrimage, we shall straightway then show full justice regarding them.

53. We shall have the same respite, moreover, and in the same manner, in the matter of showing justice with regard to forests to be annulled and forests to remain, which Henry our father or Richard our brother constituted; and in the matter of wardships of lands which belong to the fee of another--wardships of which kind we have hitherto enjoyed by reason of the fee which some one held from us in military service;--and in the matter of abbeys founded in the fee of another than ourselves--in which the lord of the fee may say that he has jurisdiction. And when we return, or if we desist from our pilgrimage, we shall straightway exhibit full justice to those complaining with regard to these matters.

54. No one shall be taken or imprisoned on account of the appeal of a woman concerning the death of another than her husband.

55. All fines imposed by us unjustly and contrary to the law of the land, and all amerciaments made unjustly and contrary to the law of the land, shall be altogether remitted, or it shall be done with regard to them according to the judgment of the twenty five barons mentioned below as sureties for the peace, or according to the judgment of the majority of them together with the aforesaid Stephen archbishop of Canterbury, if he can be present, and with others whom he may wish to associate with himself for this purpose. And if he can not be present, the affair shall nevertheless proceed without him; in such way that, if one or more of the said twenty five barons shall be concerned in a similar complaint, they shall be removed as to this particular decision, and, in their place, for this purpose alone, others shall be subtituted who shall be chosen and sworn by the remainder of those twenty five.

56. If we have disseized or dispossessed Welshmen of their lands or liberties or other things without legal judgment of their peers, in England or in Wales,--they shall straightway be restored to them. And if a dispute shall arise concerning this, then action shall be taken upon it in the March through judgment of their peers- -concerning English holdings according to the law of England, concerning Welsh holdings according to the law of Wales, concerning holdings in the March according to the law of the March. The Welsh shall do likewise with regard to us and our subjects.

57. But with regard to all those things of which any one of the Welsh by king Henry our father or king Richard our brother, disseized or dispossessed without legal judgment of his peers, which we have in our hand or which others hold, and for which we ought to give a guarantee: we shall have respite until the common term for crusaders. Except with regard to those concerning which a plea was moved, or an inquest made by our order, before we took the cross. But when we return from our pilgrimage, or if, by chance, we desist from our pilgrimage, we shall straightway then show full justice regarding them, according to the laws of Wales and the aforesaid districts.

58. We shall straightway return the son of Llewelin and all the Welsh hostages, and the charters delivered to us as surety for the peace.

59. We shall act towards Alexander king of the Scots regarding the restoration of his sisters, and his hostages, and his liberties and his lawful right, as we shall act towards our other barons of England; unless it ought to be otherwise according to the charters which we hold from William, his father, the former king of the Scots. And this shall be done through judgment of his peers in our court.

60. Moreover all the subjects of our realm, clergy as well as laity, shall, as far as pertains to them, observe, with regard to their vassals, all these aforesaid customs and liberties which we have decreed shall, as far as pertains to us, be observed in our realm with regard to our own.

61. Inasmuch as, for the sake of God, and for the bettering of our realm, and for the more ready healing of the discord which has arisen between us and our barons, we have made all these aforesaid concessions,--wishing them to enjoy for ever entire and firm stability, we make and grant to them the folIowing security: that the baron, namely, may elect at their pleaure twenty five barons from the realm, who ought, with all their strength, to observe, maintain and cause to be observed, the peace and privileges which we have granted to them and confirmed by this our present charter. In such wise, namely, that if we, or our justice, or our bailiffs, or any one of our servants shall have transgressed against any one in any respect, or shall have broken one of the articles of peace or security, and our transgression shall have been shown to four barons of the aforesaid twenty five: those four barons shall come to us, or, if we are abroad, to our justice, showing to us our error; and they shall ask us to cause that error to be amended without delay. And if we do not amend that error, or, we being abroad, if our justice do not amend it within a term of forty days from the time when it was shown to us or, we being abroad, to our justice: the aforesaid four barons shall refer the matter to the remainder of the twenty five barons, and those twenty five barons, with the whole land in common, shall distrain and oppress us in every way in their power,--namely, by taking our castles, lands and possessions, and in every other way that they can, until amends shall have been made according to their judnnent. Saving the persons of ourselves, our queen and our children. And when amends shall have been made they shall be in accord with us as they had been previously. And whoever of the land wishes to do so, shall swear that in carrying out all the aforesaid measures he will obey the mandates of the aforesaid twenty five barons, and that, with them, he will oppress us to the extent of his power. And, to any one who wishes to do so, we publicly and freely give permission to swear; and we will never prevent any one from swearing. Moreover, all those in the land who shall be unwilling, themselves and of their own accord, to swear to the twenty five barons as to distraining and oppressing us with them: such ones we shall make to wear by our mandate, as has been said. And if any one of the twenty five barons shall die, or leave the country, or in any other way be prevented from carrying out the aforesaid measures,--the remainder of the aforesaid twenty five barons shall choose another in his place, according to their judgment, who shall be sworn in the same way as the others. Moreover, in all things entrusted to those twenty five barons to be carried out, if those twenty five shall be present and chance to disagree among themselves with regard to some matter, or if some of them, having been summoned, shall be unwilling or unable to be present: that which the majority of those present shall decide or decree shall be considered binding and valid, just as if all the twenty five had consented to it. And the aforesaid twenty five shall swear that they will faithfully observe all the foregoing, and will caue them be observed to the extent of their power. And we shall obtain nothing from any one, either through ourselves or through another, by which any of those concessions and liberties may be revoked or diminished. And if any such thing shall have been obtained, it shall be vain and invalid, and we shall never make use of it either through ourselves or through another.

62. And we have fully remitted to all, and pardoned, all the ill- will, anger and rancour which have arisen between us and our subjects, clergy and laity, from the time of the struggle. Moreover have fully remitted to all, clergy and laity, and--as far as pertains to us--have pardoned fully all the transgressions committed, on the occasion of that same struggle, from Easter of the sixteenth year of our reign until the re-establishment of peace. In witness of which, more-over, we have caused to be drawn up for them letters patent of lord Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, lord Henry, archbishop of Dubland the aforesaid bishops and master Pandulf, regarding that surety and the aforesaid concessions.

63. Wherefore we will and firmly decree that the English church shall be free, and that the subjects of our realm shall have and hold all the aforesaid liberties, rights and concessions, duly and in peace, freely and quietly, fully and entirely, for themselves and their heirs from us and our heirs, in all matters and in all places, forever, as has been said. Moreover it has been sworn, on our part as well as on the part of the barons, that all these above mentioned provisions shall observed with good faith and without evil intent. The witnesses being the above mentioned and many others. Given through our hand, in the plain called Runnymede between Windsor and Stanes, on the fifteenth day of June, in the seventeenth year of our reign.

In a sentence, why Cameron must now sack outed Bilderberger Osborne

In just one sentence...

David Cameron must sack his now-outed Bilderberg-attending Chancellor George Osborne because nobody can trust that this is not a smokescreen for the direct result of instructions received while in Switzerland with his Bilderberg slimeball mates last week.

Bilderberg attendee = treacherous scumbag, in my view.

The end.

Quote of the Day: 12th June 2011

"For such a person, who is primarily responsible for countless sleepless nights, suffered by British subjects in foreign prison cells, and their relatives, such a reward is, in my humble opinion, an affront."

- William Dartmouth, UKIP, is disgusted by the knighthood of Lib Dem MEP Graham Watson in the Queen's Bithday Honours List

...well, this blogger does write to people in high office highlighting treason, as defined by the treason laws. Not many like acknowledging the treason laws, but they exist.

At least Swiss Parliamentarians are quite happy to call out treason when they see it.

H/T: HighTory (great post, by the way)

Italian foreign ministry demanding answers after Bilderberg assault on MEP

The Bilderberg Conference looks set to end up at the centre of an international diplomatic row.

The Italian Foreign Ministry and the Italian Embassy in Switzerland are demanding answers after Italian MEP Mario Borghezio was assaulted by Bilderberg security.

More info: Swissinfo.ch

H/T: PrisonPlanet.com

Mandelson heckled and booed by Bilderberg Protesters: Video

...that's it, come out of the darkness, you swine... we've flushed you buggers out now.

No thanks to the BBC.

Oh no. The alternative media have flushed the buggers out... with a little help from the Russians, of all people:

See also:
Charlie Skelton (The Guardian) - Bilderberg 2011: Lord Mandelson's nature walk

Bilderberg: An open letter to all British Members of Parliament

The Treasury has reportedly told Charlie Skelton for The Guardian that George Osborne is attending the Bilderberg Conference in Switzerland in an official capacity this weekend.

Could you, on Monday, ensure that Mr. Osborne gives a statement to the House of Commons detailing what was discussed and what plans he intends to put in place as a result of meetings held in his capacity as a servant of the British people?

Could you also ask the Information Commissioner to confirm that the minutes of all such meetings taken in an official capacity are subject to Freedom of Information requests?

Could you also ask for a statement seeking confirmation of and, if accurate, outlining the basis for attendance of the same conference by Peter Mandelson, John Kerr and Rory Stewart MP - was this attendance, apparently uncovered by Swiss press agencies, in a private capacity or related to their roles in public office?

As Ken Clarke is widely believed to be on the Bilderberg steering committee (according to a website which claims to be an official Bilderberg website), may we ask why he was not in attendance according to these same guest lists published by the Swiss media?

Further, could you ask Foreign Secretary William Hague to give a statement to the House of Commons outlining the diplomatic position in terms of Swiss parliamentarians asking prosecutors in Switzerland to arrest all Bilderberg attendees for crimes of treason against the Swiss nation state?

Could we also have a statement on the grounds for refusing entry to this conference of a delegation of parliamentarians of the Swiss state who felt that the people who elect them are entitled to know what is being discussed by Royalty, Ministers and key industrialists when that meeting takes place on Swiss sovereign soil?

Could we ask the Home Secretary from the floor of the House of Commons whether a D-notice has been put out to the British media instructing them to suppress reporting of the Bilderberg Conference? If so, why? If not, does it not seem rather strange that there is little credible reporting in any media in this country on a conference attended by global political leaders and business luminaries?

Could we also have a statement on the assault of Italian MEP Mario Borghezio who was attempting to gain admittance to the Bilderbeg Conference attended by George Osborne in an official capacity? You will note that Mr. Borghezio - an elected representative of the Italian people - intends to press criminal prosecution proceedings as a result of the physical assault he endured.

You will, of course, be aware that Lord Tebbit has publicly confirmed having once attended a Bilderberg Conference and, through his Daily Telegraph blog, hinted that his patriotic agenda and allegiance to his country and her people differed quite widely from the Bilderberg agenda.

You will also be aware that freely available public records confirm the previous attendance of this conference by Ken Clarke, Tony Blair, Ed Balls and a number of other politicians of all three main parties - regular attendance by British public servants which stretches back to the mid 1950's.

However, despite this now being common knowledge, the British people have been misled for many years by the British media into thinking the Bilderberg conference was nothing more than a 'conspiracy theory'. We now know that it was never a 'theory' but a fact. We trust that there has never been any 'conspiracy' against this country either directly or indirectly as a result of attending the Bilderberg conference, but now seek reassurance about the entire history of these goings-on.

BREAKING! Protesting Italian MEP assaulted and thrown to ground outside Bilderberg

Breaking...

"Italian MEP Mario Borghezio was reportedly given a bloody nose on Thursday as he attempted to sneak into the secretive Bilderberg conference in St. Moritz.

Borghezio, of right-wing Italian party Lega Nord, was reportedly with another Italian as he attempted to infiltrate the luxury Suvretta House hotel where the conference is taking place."

Some sources are stating that Borghezio has suffered a broken nose in the incident.

Read more:
http://www.thelocal.ch/national/20110610_310.html

See also:
Prison Planet - Bilderberg Security Assaults EU Member

Alleged British Bilderberg 2011 attendees

The following is a list of alleged British attendees of the Bilderberg meeting in Switzerland:

Great Britain
Agius, Marcus, Chairman, Barclays PLC
Flint, Douglas J., Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings
Kerr, John, Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell
Lambert, Richard, Independent Non-Executive Director, Ernst & Young
Mandelson, Peter, Member, House of Lords; Chairman, Global Counsel
Micklethwait, John, Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
Osborne, George, Chancellor of the Exchequer
Stewart, Rory, Member of Parliament (Conservative)
Taylor, J. Martin, Chairman, Syngenta International AG

This blog makes no claim as to the accuracy of this list, only that this list is now in wide circulation.

UPDATE: Charlie Skelton for The Guardian has just been on air with Alex Jones. Skelton has told the world that The Treasury have stated that George Osborne is at the Bilderberg meeting in an official capacity with Treasury staff... you know that makes him accountable to YOU and to the House of Commons, don't you?

Meanwhile, Dominique Baettig - Swiss parliamentarian - has vowed he will march into the Bilderberg meeting and force entry. Baettig has written to Swiss prosecutors, demanding all Bilderberg attendees be arrested for treason.

Shame our own MPs don't have a spine of that standard for our own traitors, huh?

Daily Telegraph's Labour Revelations: Bilderberger Ed Balls and the plot to give Britain Calamity Brown

The revelations in the Daily Telegraph about the plots and skulduggery at the heart of the Labour Party are no great surprise.

We learn that Ed Balls and his Merry Marxist Proteges were behind a powerful coup that forced Tony Blair from office.

None of this seems terribly new and, what happened next, the Lisbon Treaty and the collapsing of our economy - was quite spectacular.

But this is the point - Ed Balls. Bilderberg attendee.

Bilderberg attendee plots to oust democratically elected Prime Minister (Blair, also a Bilderberg attendee)... and replaces him with unelected idiot who committed ultimate treason by signing the Lisbon Treaty and drove Britain to the edge of bankruptcy; giving unlimited amounts of money to banksters and putting us on the verge of an IMF takeover - an act that would have been accomplished had the need for a General Election not taken over events.

Bilderberg attendees, turning Britain into a police state - 1% of the world's population, 25% of all the world's CCTV cameras.

Most of the laws of our country - dictated by the EU.

Herman Von Rumpy-Pumpy. Bilderberg.

Bilderberg. Bilderberg. Bilderberg.

Why won't any of our policemen go arrest them for treason?

Meanwhile, we hear from the States that Hillary Clinton - alleged Bilderberg attendee - wants to run the World Bank.

The entire world is being stitched up and organised by people who attend these Bilderberg meetings.

We need to know what's going on there.

To that end - get to St. Moritz, Switzerland, noon, 11th June. Tomorrow.

And if you can't? Start asking questions of our Members of Parliament.

We have to rid all branches of government - local, national and international - of all those contaminated by the stench of Bilderberg.

Thought for the Day: Video version

Not often this blog does this.

...but we've just been made aware of a performer named David Hoyle:

This. Every word of it.

Catch the performer concerned, David Hoyle if you can... seems like an awesome mind to us, if this is anything to go by.

Government refuses inquest to determine whether or not Government bumped off Dr. David Kelly

The Government has announced that it will not hold a full inquest into the death of Dr. David Kelly.

Like the Government was going to give a court with jurors the chance to investigate and give a verdict on whether the Government bumped him off...

Predictable? You bet!

The only reason Diana got an half-arsed excuse for an inquest was because Mohamed Al Fayed had enough money to keep investigating and turning up new evidence.

As for Dr. David Kelly?

Let's quote from the doctors - professionals in their field - who have grave doubts about what happened to the poor man.

They say: "If an inquest is denied, despite all the evidence carefully provided to the Attorney General, there is a real and grave risk that your Government will be seen as continuing, and being complicit in, an enormous conspiracy to pervert the course of justice."

How does the saying go with the Labour Stasi supporters..?

'Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.'

So, we must conclude that the Government has something to fear.

Simple.

After Dangerous Duff... meet the Lib Dem MEP who voted for YOU to pay an extra £3 BILLION to Brussels

After dangerous Andrew Duff (Lib Dem MEP) was outed plotting behind the backs of the British in Brussels... an issue over which Her Majesty The Queen still hasn't dignified us with a response to, despite the treason laws...

...here comes the Lib Dem MEP who voted for you to have to hand over yet another £3 BILLION to Brussels.

Roger Helmer takes up the story of how: "East Midlands Lib-Dem MEP Bill Newton Dunn voted today in the European parliament in Strasbourg to scrap Britain’s EU rebate, negotiated by Margaret Thatcher at Fontainebleau in 1984."

Wonder how many £9,000 (!) student tuition fees the Lib Dems could waive for £3 BILLION..?

It's 333,333 university places.

So, students.... there's another 333,333 reasons never to vote Liberal Democrat.

Three billion reasons for the rest of us.

Meanwhile, the House of Lords has demanded a 40% turnout in referendums under Call Me Dave's worthless 'referendum lock' on the transfer of powers to Brussels.

Amazing that they didn't demand such a thing of Nick Clegg's waste of space referendum on AV. Probably afraid he'd cwy and cwy and cwy...

Not that we need a referendum. Our membership of the European Union is unlawful under our constitution so we just need someone who is not a traitor to cancel and nullify all those unlawful and invalid signatures.

Simple.

I, for one, will never accept the European Union. Our constitution says I don't have to - it has no lawful standing in this country.

Hilariously, Tony Blair is in The Guardian warning that: "Dictators must 'change or be changed'."

Alas, it was not a reference to the European Union.

But that he doesn't see the irony... or hypocrisy.

Instead, the silly prat is calling for more EU - just as all the people of European nation states are sick to the back teeth of it.

See also:
Daily Express - TAXPAYERS FACE ANOTHER £8BN BAILOUT FOR ‘BANKRUPT’ GREECE

It's started... free speech on the internet to be banned (for your safety, obviously)

So... you know those alleged 'terrorists'..? The useful idiots who rant nonsense with a perverse religious fervour but somehow, suspiciously, never get arrested?

Well, because of those people, they're now wanting to censor the internet.

See here and here.

Now, I know... you're cynical.

But Theresa May really does want to ban your free speech for no other reason than to keep you safe!

True, your children are being sexually assaulted by airport security staff in the name of 'safety'.

True, hundreds of thousands of people who don't even look the same as the religious ranters were stopped and searched - and the only thing ever found was a photographer with some holiday snaps of Big Ben.

True, local councils used terror laws to spy on your dustbins and to check which schools you were entitled to send your children to.

But censoring your free speech on the internet? Nothing cynical in that. It really is just for your safety. It has nothing to do with the awakening of humanity and the gathering global consciousness which is growing in unity.

No. Nothing to do with any of that.

It is censorship for your safety which will only be targetted at extremists.

So, if you don't believe in 'man made global warming' - extremist! - you're first.

Unhappy at taxes? Extremist! You're second.

Think your kid's school is crap? Extremist! You're third.

All for your safety, of course.

Theresa May. Gotta love her. She is in no way comparable to Jacqui Smith. Oh no... and anybody who calls Theresa May a totalitarian bitchbag who is using the bogeyman of 'terrorist extremists' (patsy!) to shut down the internet...

...well, if you think that, you're an extremist, aren't you? We're coming to get you now.

"Bilderberg members used Swiss banks to pay for assassinations"

So, as the countdown to Bilderberg-Watch continues...

We've noticed that we've had a few new faces (to us) linking over the last week - so welcome to new friends.

We've also noticed a few hits coming from the comments under an article on a site not encountered before.

Now then, the article concerned is an interview, borrowed from a Russian website.

The interview purports to have been conducted with a Swiss banker who alleges that high ranking Bilderberg members have been using Swiss banks to transfer mind-boggling sums of money in order to conduct: "...the assassination of people, funding revolutions, funding strikes, funding all sorts of parties. I know that certain people who are Bilderbergers were involved in such orders. I mean they gave the orders to kill."

Read the full interview for yourself and make your own mind up as to whether you think this genuine. It's to be found HERE and HERE.

Greek protesters emulate some of the more open-spirited British EU-sceptic independent bloggers

There's a delightful post over on Open Europe's blog.

They are focusing on the Greek protests. We quite like Open Europe - even though they do not advocate withdrawal from the corrupt and undemocratic EU.

Anyway, they cover some of what's being said... but it's the pictures they've chosen to highlight their post that are really interesting.

The first shows that protesters have hung up some lengths of hemp.

And then..? Then there's this:

...so, the Greek protesters have shown their agreement with some of us on the British EU-sceptic blogosphere - and what better way to show that agreement and realisation than through a one-step further emulation.

Well done to the Greeks for picking up a simple yet powerful image to convey their message... and well done to Open Europe for being brave enough (for a credible news source in the UK) to carry that image.

This blog has never carried that image ourselves... though we have continually pointed out that there are various Nazi links tied in to the origins of the European Empire - all of them debated but all seemingly having degrees of truth behind them.

Anyway, where do Open Europe get the image they've shown from? German news source Bild. Ouch!

No War for Banksters: Is this what the Libya action is really about?

Food for thought, not available on the BBC...

Whatever Do Ye-mean, Willie?

Our god-awful Foreign Secretary William Hague has been found, actually spotted doing his job.

Or, at least, attempting to. Making a ruddy rubbish job of it, though.

The Independent reports him as warning that: "Yemen risks becoming 'a much more serious threat' to UK national security."

The readers of The Independent can seemingly see straight through Wee Willie's rhetoric are are throwing great scorn on his words and declaring on his real agenda.

For our part?

No, Willie. Yemen does not risk becoming a much more serious threat to national security.

Dismantling our armed forces and shaming our Royal Navy by making them take up a bizarre timeshare arrangement with the French - that creates a much more serious threat to national security... us being an island, and all.

Wonder if Hague or any of his Whitehall colleagues have noticed that we're an island in the middle of the North Atlantic, yet?

What's this surrounding the nation? Water? The sea? By golly! How did that get there? When did that happen?

Doh!

Sunday Paper Review: 5th June 2011

Here's our regular glance over the Sunday newspapers then... do try to forgive our incredible cynicism as we look over all of them, won't you?

The Sunday Express leads with details of an investigation into "the £1billion industry that sucks taxpayers’ cash out of Britain’s asylum chaos."

The report names some of the private businesses - dotted all over the globe - being paid millions upon millions in contract arrangements related to our immigration and asylum system.

I can think of a few million or billion reasons why it's not in anyone's interests to get a grip on Britain's porous borders, then.

Wonder if anyone in Government has shares in the suppliers of these services? Isn't that normally how these things work?

The Mail on Sunday is reporting "Theresa May and Michael Gove at war over crackdown on home-grown terror".

Interesting thing is, Gove is accusing May of being too soft - apparently. If he thinks that Theresa May, the most authoritarian Home Secretary since the control-freak Jacqui 'Jackboot' Smith, is soft... what does that say about Gove? Scary.

Anyway, the story deals with yet another launch to crack down on what are supposedly "home grown extremists" of the allegedly non-false flag variety. Of course, you can guarantee that deportation won't be part of the strategy... it'll no doubt involve removing yet more of all of our liberties and freedoms.

Sounds like another New Labour style civil liberties witch hunt is on the way, then. Way to go, Tories! Let's see if you can't make yourselves as hated as the Labour lot that we booted out just a year since.

Some bloke named John Major is prattling on in the Sunday Telegraph about why it's great for us to bankrupt the nation giving aid to overseas nations that have their own space programmes and armed forces which aren't shared with the French. Idiot.

Trying to remember who this John Major fella is. Hang on a minute... wasn't he the bloke who made the Conservative Party so unpopular that the British public went running to the Labour Party for thirteen long years - thus inflicting Tony Blair and Gordon Brown (and all their attendant damage) on the nation?

Oh yeah. That was him. Idiot.

David now Lord Steel is in The Observer, launching what the newspaper describes as "strongest criticism yet of Nick Clegg's bid to make upper house at least 80% elected".

That's good... but the criticism isn't strong enough for us. How about: "Quisling Clegg wants to permanently destroy our constitution in order to ship us defenceless down the European Union alley. The traitorous scumbag. And he hopes to hide the scam by calling it more 'democratic'."

There. That's better.

The Independent on Sunday says that members of the public are: "to help decide fitting punishment for errant MPs".

Can't see that one passing. Most of us are already at the stage of shouting: "Hang him!". It's a struggle not to agree with the sentiment, sometimes.

The Sunday Mirror tries to whip up faux tribal outrage through reporting claims that "William Hague enjoys £1,500-a-night luxury break – as Britain reels from grim economic results."

Frankly, we're surprised the newspaper can tell the difference between when our invisible Foreign Secretary is on holiday and when he's working. Aren't they the same?

Anyway, we await the Sunday Mirror's report on how much Gordon Brown has claimed from the public purse while never turning up at the House of Commons for the job he's paid to do.

Oh no... they wouldn't report that now, would they? Too tribal for balance.

And finally... Pippa Middleton is everywhere in the papers. Totally perfect bridesmaid, but we would have thought the papers might have moved on by now. Not so. Anyway, The People take a spin on her life with a headline which we'd rewrite as 'Non-shock as nice bloke meets his sister-in-law for a cuppa'.

Sensational. Not.