Is it safe? Can we look at the papers? Will they be full of 'Hackgate' stories which look at only the 'leftist' agenda? Will they be full of Norway nutter stories where anyone who disagrees with 'leftists' is branded an 'extremist' for having an opinion?
Let's find out in this, the first paper review of what is traditionally the 'silly season'.
The attempt to link the Norway nutter to Britain continues, with any tenuous and incredible link being served up to cause alarm. Problem, reaction, solution. This time, the Sunday Telegraph ties British people into the mass murdering nutter by stating that Breivik bought "key equipment" which helped "build his arsenal of weaponry and explosives" from Brits on Ebay.
Cue a faux outrage and demands to shut down access to Ebay? Perhaps no need. The report also states that: "MI5 is thought to monitor eBay..." - so those Rick Astley records you've been buying thinking no-one would know are probably catalogued next to your name in Spook HQ.
It's a good job Woolworths has gone. Imagine being profiled on the basis of what you choose to scoop for your Pick 'n' Mix.
We wondered how long it would be before our wonderful Diana, Princess of Wales was mentioned in the context of 'Hackgate'. Think about that one. Well, she has been mentioned now. It appears that the 'cad' James Hewitt is demanding the Metropolitan Police reopen a file on "the theft of love letters written by the Princess" which were "stolen from a safe at Mr Hewitt's home in Bratton Clovelly, Devon, in 1998."
The complaint by Hewitt centres on the fact that the letters apparently turned up at the offices of the Daily Mirror, under the stewardship of Piers Morgan.
We won't get too drawn on Piers Morgan and 'Hackgate' but we will say that, on many occasions, he has stood up to protect the interests of Diana - both in terms of campaigning for a fitting memorial to our Princess and in talking openly about some of the more suspicious aspects of her as-yet-unsolved unlawful killing.
That's all we'll say on that matter - for now. Though we will say that - although Hewitt behaved incredibly badly towards Diana - the mystery of those letters is a dark one, a story which no doubt merits some more senior police attention. Think about that: Diana, unlawful killing and letters... she is thought by some close to her to have sent them everywhere. "They are planning an 'accident' in my car.."
The Observer which - like sister publication The Guardian - doesn't even pretend not to be biased anymore has the predictable nonsense about 'the far right', adding some extraordinary claims about the EDL and showing their disdain for America's 'Tea Party' movement.
So, it is with a half grin and raised eyebrow that we note their carrying of an opinion piece by Will Hutton in which he remarks: "China will implode if it doesn't change its authoritarian ways."
Bit rich from The Observer. The 'left' is the natural home of authoritarianism. New Labour police state, anyone?
That they don't see the irony. We'll stay happily on 'the right' campaigning for freedom and liberty, thanks.
The Sunday Express decides to hit back by putting criticism of that other 'left wing' propaganda unit known as the BBC on their front page.
This follows a radio broadcast on Radio Four's 'Today' programme on Friday in which listeners of the breakfast-time show heard the contents of emails including the words: 'Bullshit' and 'bastards'.
We won't join the Sunday Express in lobbying for regulation of such language.
The 'Bullshit Bastard Corporation' seems fair and apt, considering their taxpayer-funded bias and loyalties to Brussels.
In other news, the Mail on Sunday offers us a foretaste of what may well be one of the big stories of the autumn.
The newspaper states that: "Tony Blair is to face scathing criticism from the official inquiry into the Iraq War for the role he played in leading Britain into one of its biggest foreign policy fiascos in modern history."
We're sure some will jump up and down in over-animated excitement at the report - but is there really anything new in this which we didn't know already?
Staying on Iraq, the People reports on claims that: "US troops paid hookers with funds intended to bribe Iraq informants."
The claims are based on a book by former Captain Jason Whiteley who also: "alleges that £5.5billion has gone missing from the war chest since the start of the 2003 conflict" including "£1.5billion in pallets of cash [sent by the US] to Iraq in 2003 on a Hercules cargo plane. Every dollar went missing."
If any now wealthy American troops are feeling particularly flush, we're all metrosexual now and open to offers if the price is right... twenty-quid would probably do it.
We jest...
Another row brewing comes in the Sunday Mirror which - in the smallest newspaper story of all time - reports that: "SECRET talks have taken place which could mean Manchester’s trams being run by French firm RATP – who operate the Paris Metro."
Can we, therefore, look forward to seeing the Labour supporting Sunday Mirror joining us in campaigning hard for UK withdrawal from the European Empire? We won't hold our breath.
Sunday, 31 July 2011
Saturday, 30 July 2011
100,000 Patriots Required: Apply Within
This one, however, might actually work.
The latest tactical move by the newspaper follows an announcement by the Government that: "...it would consider any public campaign backed by 100,000 signatures for a debate in Parliament."
Debate is one thing, getting Quislings and traitors to vote for it is quite another.
The latest attempt to force our public servants to obey the wishes and demands of we, the people comes with the backing of Tory MPs Mark Reckless and Douglas Carswell - as well as UKIP's very own Nigel Farage.
Nigel tells the paper: "It is great news that the Government is introducing this scheme, and of course the Daily Express is absolutely right to take the opportunity to call for a referendum on our EU membership."
Patriots - and we need 100,000 of you - can read the full story here or skip straight to the referendum form here.
Labour emboiled in News International sleaze: But how will The Guardian and the BBC respond?
When David Cameron recently put himself at the centre of an unprecedented three and a half hour question marathon at the dispatch box of the House of Commons, there was one point he laboured in exchanges with Labour leader Ed Miliband.
Miliband - cheered on by The Guardian and the BBC - has tried to portray himself as some kind of moral crusader in the phone hacking scandal.
On the eve of the special session of Parliament, the Conservative Party let it be known that they would publish a wealth of information on meetings that senior figures had held with media contacts.
Attempting to steal their thunder, Labour published their own list of Labour meetings with media executives.
In the debate, David Cameron - to paraphrase - called for transparency, saying that he had published all of his meetings; but would Labour do the same?
Ed Miliband asserted that he had published all of his meetings with executives since becoming leader - but Cameron demanded he published a list going back further than that, at least to the General Election as had been published by the Government.
Now, a couple of weeks later when the furore has died down, we finally get the list.
The Daily Telegraph tells us how: "Shadow cabinet attended News International parties in midst of scandal."
In the detail, we find that: "Labour leader Ed Miliband attended a string of parties hosted by News International and held talks with former chief executive Rebekah Brooks, Labour Party documents have revealed."
The Independent reports: "Labour leader Ed Miliband attended a string of News International parties and held talks with former chief executive Rebekah Brooks, records released today showed. Mr Miliband also had a series of meetings with the editors of the News of the World and the Sun, Labour confirmed."
Douglas Alexander, Ed Balls and Tessa Jowell all had plenty of social engagements related to News International, too.
Sky News details how: "Tessa Jowell, the former culture secretary who believes her phone was hacked, spent Christmas Eve and Boxing Day with Rebekah Brooks, the documents show."
So, for all their muckraking and their theatre of morality, it appears that the Labour Party - never afraid to become embroiled in sleaze - were right at the centre of the scandal over which they sought to make much political capital.
Not that this will come as a surprise to anyone.
The interesting thing will be to see how the Labour Party's cheerleaders - The Guardian and the BBC - respond to the revelations.
With the Conservative Party being soundly fingered because of Andy Coulson's role at Number Ten, The Guardian and the BBC have been relentless in forcing 'Hackgate' stories at us.
At some points, the absurdity of the witch hunt was beyond any rational perspective - dominating the news even while economic meltdown was bringing down the entire European Empire (and still will).
So, how will The Guardian and the BBC handle these new details about Labour's involvement with News International?
And UK Uncut - complete with their unfunny comedians who think it okay to commit acts of violence against eighty year old defenceless pensioners - how will they respond?
Do The Guardian, the BBC and UK Uncut only get on their high horse when they see the political advantage for Labour and 'the left'..?
We're about to find out.
Though most of us, I suspect, know the answer already.
Miliband - cheered on by The Guardian and the BBC - has tried to portray himself as some kind of moral crusader in the phone hacking scandal.
On the eve of the special session of Parliament, the Conservative Party let it be known that they would publish a wealth of information on meetings that senior figures had held with media contacts.
Attempting to steal their thunder, Labour published their own list of Labour meetings with media executives.
In the debate, David Cameron - to paraphrase - called for transparency, saying that he had published all of his meetings; but would Labour do the same?
Ed Miliband asserted that he had published all of his meetings with executives since becoming leader - but Cameron demanded he published a list going back further than that, at least to the General Election as had been published by the Government.
Now, a couple of weeks later when the furore has died down, we finally get the list.
The Daily Telegraph tells us how: "Shadow cabinet attended News International parties in midst of scandal."
In the detail, we find that: "Labour leader Ed Miliband attended a string of parties hosted by News International and held talks with former chief executive Rebekah Brooks, Labour Party documents have revealed."
The Independent reports: "Labour leader Ed Miliband attended a string of News International parties and held talks with former chief executive Rebekah Brooks, records released today showed. Mr Miliband also had a series of meetings with the editors of the News of the World and the Sun, Labour confirmed."
Douglas Alexander, Ed Balls and Tessa Jowell all had plenty of social engagements related to News International, too.
Sky News details how: "Tessa Jowell, the former culture secretary who believes her phone was hacked, spent Christmas Eve and Boxing Day with Rebekah Brooks, the documents show."
So, for all their muckraking and their theatre of morality, it appears that the Labour Party - never afraid to become embroiled in sleaze - were right at the centre of the scandal over which they sought to make much political capital.
Not that this will come as a surprise to anyone.
The interesting thing will be to see how the Labour Party's cheerleaders - The Guardian and the BBC - respond to the revelations.
With the Conservative Party being soundly fingered because of Andy Coulson's role at Number Ten, The Guardian and the BBC have been relentless in forcing 'Hackgate' stories at us.
At some points, the absurdity of the witch hunt was beyond any rational perspective - dominating the news even while economic meltdown was bringing down the entire European Empire (and still will).
So, how will The Guardian and the BBC handle these new details about Labour's involvement with News International?
And UK Uncut - complete with their unfunny comedians who think it okay to commit acts of violence against eighty year old defenceless pensioners - how will they respond?
Do The Guardian, the BBC and UK Uncut only get on their high horse when they see the political advantage for Labour and 'the left'..?
We're about to find out.
Though most of us, I suspect, know the answer already.
Friday, 29 July 2011
Slovakian People: We're not keen on this EU shambles now, either
No need for us to comment, is there?
None of us want you, European Empire. Not we the people, anyway.
RT can be found on Sky Channel 512. Note that the EU-collaborative BBC won't tell you any of this.
From the UK? Oppose the great EU? Racist! Xenophobe! (according to the BBC/Guardian set).
But the rest of Europe hate the darn EU too. See?
None of us want you, European Empire. Not we the people, anyway.
RT can be found on Sky Channel 512. Note that the EU-collaborative BBC won't tell you any of this.
From the UK? Oppose the great EU? Racist! Xenophobe! (according to the BBC/Guardian set).
But the rest of Europe hate the darn EU too. See?
Ron Paul 2012... if the USA has any sense.
What the world needs now is... Ron Paul.
Don't you wish we had someone like that in Downing Street..? Or even in the House of Commons..?
Indeed, back at home, the awful bank that is Lloyds TSB - the one with vast billions of our taxpayer money - has been busy writing to all its customers announcing that they will be linking credit card rates to the Bank of England base rate.
This is not some special offer. Listen to what Ron Paul says, carefully.
That Lloyds TSB - and others - have been charging people excessive interest rates with no correlation to the Bank of England rate for so long is criminal.
Now, with predictions that interest rates around the globe are set to soar, they finally decide they DO want a link to base rates.
Not that "base rate plus 20-odd percent" interest on lending you a small portion of your own money back sounds too reasonable...
It remains to be seen whether other UK banking organisations follow suit. Let us know what you receive...
Meanwhile, back to Ron Paul:
Don't you wish we had someone like that in Downing Street..? Or even in the House of Commons..?
Indeed, back at home, the awful bank that is Lloyds TSB - the one with vast billions of our taxpayer money - has been busy writing to all its customers announcing that they will be linking credit card rates to the Bank of England base rate.
This is not some special offer. Listen to what Ron Paul says, carefully.
That Lloyds TSB - and others - have been charging people excessive interest rates with no correlation to the Bank of England rate for so long is criminal.
Now, with predictions that interest rates around the globe are set to soar, they finally decide they DO want a link to base rates.
Not that "base rate plus 20-odd percent" interest on lending you a small portion of your own money back sounds too reasonable...
It remains to be seen whether other UK banking organisations follow suit. Let us know what you receive...
Meanwhile, back to Ron Paul:
Thursday, 28 July 2011
Reboot Warning: The Burning Times (2011 Edition)
Preface: This British history prelude does have a current political relevance - do stick with it and read the prelude.
-
On the Summer Solstice every year, hundreds of people - including one or two bona fide druids - descend on Stonehenge in Wiltshire to see the solstice sunrise.
The historical significance of Stonehenge is subject to many debates, theories and archaeological pondering.
What is not in doubt, however, is that the main religions of the ancient British isles were pagan.
The local witch (from the Anglo Saxon for 'wise one') would know which local herbs would cure the village ailments - as would various other heathens; soothsayers and necromancers would understand the alignment of the stars and relate alignments to crops and fertility.
They were not normally monotheistic religions. Indeed, many Gods and Goddesses were worshipped and known by name.
While some of the ancient wisdom of the land and seasons related to agricultural necessities, their incorporation into spirituality of these early British religions demonstrated an understanding that there is a balance and duality in all things.
For every action, a reaction. For every positive, a negative.
Into Britain then came a shiny new religion. It's leaders were far more educated and they were masters in marketing. These people were Christians. Over a period of time, they convinced the local people - through persuasion or persecution - that their pagan deities were the enemy of the true God.
In a further shrewd move of marketing, they placed their temples (churches) on ancient pagan worship sites and placed their festivals on the dates of key pagan celebrations.
Some pagan craftsmen were wise and crafty enough to decide that they were not having that and they carved into these Christian buildings designs to represent the pagan 'God of the Hunt' or 'Jack o' The Green'. Many of these survive on the external facades of older churches and cathedrals today.
Then in the late fifteenth century, two German monks wrote a book called Malleus Maleficarum. This book set out how to identify and interrogate a witch - by now, witches were seen as worshippers of 'Satan' rather than being honest women (or men) with a know-how on herbs and early medicine.
Once someone - often but not always a woman - was denounced or accused of witchcraft, they were subject to humiliating strip searches with their inquisitors looking for any mole or birth blemish which might have been a 'mark of the devil'. After further torture, if no confession of witchcraft and devil worship was forthcoming, they may have faced the ducking stool.
The ducking stool involved tying the accused 'witch' (whether s/he was a witch or not) into a chair which was then submerged into a river. The accused would either drown or survive - but if they survived, they were found guilty of being a witch...
...at which point, they could look forward to being burned at the stake.
As a result, many people who were completely innocent of anything - let alone worshipping the 'wrong' Gods - were killed.
This period became known as 'the burning times'.
-
What on earth is a political blog doing giving us this simplified history lesson, I hear you ask...
I post it as a warning... to beware the burning times.
I suspect I can see what is happening.
In the last couple of decades, we've seen lots of clashes of opposites.
We had immigrants versus the 'indigenous'.
We've had Christian versus Muslim.
And, after Norway, we've seen an excess of very poor taste 'left' versus 'right' (mostly from clueless people who haven't a clue what either term means).
The Christian versus Muslim divide is an interesting one and this blog has not indulged in any anti-Muslim rants.
If anything, our suspicions about the true nature of 9/11 and 7/7 mean that we've been cushioned against knee jerk reactions to 'terror' events. The response of New Labour and Governments all over the world - an endless onslaught against liberties and freedoms - further reinforced that suspicious view on what was really happening.
We have to be careful what we say, but the Norway mass murdering psychopath... there's something not quite right about that story, if you ask me.
And, uncomfortable though it is, I think the fighting between 'left' and 'right' was deliberately engineered.
So, what do we see in the newspaper today?
A story in The Independent where the new IMF head Christine Lagarde apparently sounds a warning about the potential for further unrest in Europe due to the current economic situation.
She is quoted as saying: "Social problems are of major concern to advanced economies, too. The young in particular are having a hard time finding work – with potentially lifelong implications in terms of employability and income. At the same time, the older generations are fighting to protect their health and pension benefits. Combine the two and we may face a 'clash of generations'."
And I smell a rat. I smell the next 'false flag'.
I suspect that the elites are going to start planting stories in the media deliberately trying to divide people along age demographic lines.
They've done it on skin colour, religion, gender, sexuality, income and politics.
A 'clash of generations' is the last divide left for the elites to exploit.
Do not be conned - beware the burning times.
Do not hate people because of their skin colour, nationality, religion, gender, sexuality, age or anything else.
If you want to protest because you think your standard of living is being reduced, then look for who is really to blame.
We, the people have no fight with each other.
On an European level, I love the Spanish, the Greeks gave the world drama and democracy, the Italians are friendly and sexy and even the Germans are quite nice. Dated one myself, once!
We, the people have no problem with each other.
We share the same frustrations and we have the same desired outcomes.
Do not be diverted from what is going on here - a small number of elites are profiting from your misery. Many of these are banksters and corporations, some of them are international politicians and shadow elites.
It is these people we are all united in being upset at.
Beware the burning times, particularly denunciations of witchcraft - now manifest as false flag terrorism.
It is now my sincere belief that the elites will try to turn us against each other; to divert our attention from their criminality and corruption and to fall right into their plan to usher in a New World Order.
Beware the burning times! Blessed be!
-
On the Summer Solstice every year, hundreds of people - including one or two bona fide druids - descend on Stonehenge in Wiltshire to see the solstice sunrise.
The historical significance of Stonehenge is subject to many debates, theories and archaeological pondering.
What is not in doubt, however, is that the main religions of the ancient British isles were pagan.
The local witch (from the Anglo Saxon for 'wise one') would know which local herbs would cure the village ailments - as would various other heathens; soothsayers and necromancers would understand the alignment of the stars and relate alignments to crops and fertility.
They were not normally monotheistic religions. Indeed, many Gods and Goddesses were worshipped and known by name.
While some of the ancient wisdom of the land and seasons related to agricultural necessities, their incorporation into spirituality of these early British religions demonstrated an understanding that there is a balance and duality in all things.
For every action, a reaction. For every positive, a negative.
Into Britain then came a shiny new religion. It's leaders were far more educated and they were masters in marketing. These people were Christians. Over a period of time, they convinced the local people - through persuasion or persecution - that their pagan deities were the enemy of the true God.
In a further shrewd move of marketing, they placed their temples (churches) on ancient pagan worship sites and placed their festivals on the dates of key pagan celebrations.
Some pagan craftsmen were wise and crafty enough to decide that they were not having that and they carved into these Christian buildings designs to represent the pagan 'God of the Hunt' or 'Jack o' The Green'. Many of these survive on the external facades of older churches and cathedrals today.
Then in the late fifteenth century, two German monks wrote a book called Malleus Maleficarum. This book set out how to identify and interrogate a witch - by now, witches were seen as worshippers of 'Satan' rather than being honest women (or men) with a know-how on herbs and early medicine.
Once someone - often but not always a woman - was denounced or accused of witchcraft, they were subject to humiliating strip searches with their inquisitors looking for any mole or birth blemish which might have been a 'mark of the devil'. After further torture, if no confession of witchcraft and devil worship was forthcoming, they may have faced the ducking stool.
The ducking stool involved tying the accused 'witch' (whether s/he was a witch or not) into a chair which was then submerged into a river. The accused would either drown or survive - but if they survived, they were found guilty of being a witch...
...at which point, they could look forward to being burned at the stake.
As a result, many people who were completely innocent of anything - let alone worshipping the 'wrong' Gods - were killed.
This period became known as 'the burning times'.
-
What on earth is a political blog doing giving us this simplified history lesson, I hear you ask...
I post it as a warning... to beware the burning times.
I suspect I can see what is happening.
In the last couple of decades, we've seen lots of clashes of opposites.
We had immigrants versus the 'indigenous'.
We've had Christian versus Muslim.
And, after Norway, we've seen an excess of very poor taste 'left' versus 'right' (mostly from clueless people who haven't a clue what either term means).
The Christian versus Muslim divide is an interesting one and this blog has not indulged in any anti-Muslim rants.
If anything, our suspicions about the true nature of 9/11 and 7/7 mean that we've been cushioned against knee jerk reactions to 'terror' events. The response of New Labour and Governments all over the world - an endless onslaught against liberties and freedoms - further reinforced that suspicious view on what was really happening.
We have to be careful what we say, but the Norway mass murdering psychopath... there's something not quite right about that story, if you ask me.
And, uncomfortable though it is, I think the fighting between 'left' and 'right' was deliberately engineered.
So, what do we see in the newspaper today?
A story in The Independent where the new IMF head Christine Lagarde apparently sounds a warning about the potential for further unrest in Europe due to the current economic situation.
She is quoted as saying: "Social problems are of major concern to advanced economies, too. The young in particular are having a hard time finding work – with potentially lifelong implications in terms of employability and income. At the same time, the older generations are fighting to protect their health and pension benefits. Combine the two and we may face a 'clash of generations'."
And I smell a rat. I smell the next 'false flag'.
I suspect that the elites are going to start planting stories in the media deliberately trying to divide people along age demographic lines.
They've done it on skin colour, religion, gender, sexuality, income and politics.
A 'clash of generations' is the last divide left for the elites to exploit.
Do not be conned - beware the burning times.
Do not hate people because of their skin colour, nationality, religion, gender, sexuality, age or anything else.
If you want to protest because you think your standard of living is being reduced, then look for who is really to blame.
We, the people have no fight with each other.
On an European level, I love the Spanish, the Greeks gave the world drama and democracy, the Italians are friendly and sexy and even the Germans are quite nice. Dated one myself, once!
We, the people have no problem with each other.
We share the same frustrations and we have the same desired outcomes.
Do not be diverted from what is going on here - a small number of elites are profiting from your misery. Many of these are banksters and corporations, some of them are international politicians and shadow elites.
It is these people we are all united in being upset at.
Beware the burning times, particularly denunciations of witchcraft - now manifest as false flag terrorism.
It is now my sincere belief that the elites will try to turn us against each other; to divert our attention from their criminality and corruption and to fall right into their plan to usher in a New World Order.
Beware the burning times! Blessed be!
Wednesday, 27 July 2011
Anyone remember, we did actually have a General Election?
Cast your mind back, if you will to Thursday 6th May 2010. It was not so very long ago.
On that day, the British people went with hope to their Polling Stations with hope of a new direction for the country after thirteen years of bad management of UK plc by the Labour Party - an odious, totalitarian, controlling, constitution-breaching, anti-democratic bunch of corrupt scumbags.
In the days that followed, democracy was thrown into dubious doubt. Despite the Conservative Party being the biggest party, they were one or two seats shorts of an overall majority. Not, incidentally, in England where they won by a landslide (but the English people have no England-only representation).
Subsequently, there was much discussion in darkened corridors and even fears that the odious Gordon Brown might have clung on to power as assorted Milibands and Mandelsons negotiated with character devoid Cleggs and Cables. Constantly on our screens was David Laws, sweeping in and out of buildings on Whitehall - brokering deals between assorted Tories and Labour. (He since had to resign from the front bench of Lib Dem political life following the expenses debacle).
Yes, you knew all this. Why are we mentioning it?
We thought we would mention it as we were wondering what was different about the direction for the country.
The faces have changed, but "the agenda" remains the same.
Diminished Parliament, laws dictated by Brussels: Check.
Knackered economy: Check.
International aid while our country's economy is crippled: Check.
Bailing out banks around the globe and letting the taxpayer suffer: Check.
Attacks on civil liberties and reductions in freedoms: Check (bar the cancelling of the Identity Card scheme).
Reduced standards of living and everyone taxed enough already: Check.
Deceptions regarding inflation figures that have no correlation to the reduction in our available disposable incomes: Check.
Exporting all industry and jobs overseas: Check.
Funding the great 'climate change' con: Check.
Influence of fake charities and lobby groups: Check.
Corruption: Check.
Bilderberg members aplenty in Cabinet: Check.
Smoking ban: Check.
I could go on and on and on and on...
...so too, no doubt, could you.
So, as we said, on Thursday 6th May 2010, we had a General Election. We kicked a ruddy awful Government out of power.
So who, pray tell, sets "the agenda"..?
Only, I cannot really tell the difference between this Government and the last one.
Can you?
So who DOES set "the agenda"..?
Only, it appears to me that you and I have no impact with our votes at the ballot box whatsoever.
We seem to have traded faces but is there really such a difference between Theresa May and Jacqui Smith? Can anyone wedge a Rizla between Bilderberg colleagues Ed Balls and George Osborne?
Just what is the difference between this Government and the last one? I can't tell. Can you?
On that day, the British people went with hope to their Polling Stations with hope of a new direction for the country after thirteen years of bad management of UK plc by the Labour Party - an odious, totalitarian, controlling, constitution-breaching, anti-democratic bunch of corrupt scumbags.
In the days that followed, democracy was thrown into dubious doubt. Despite the Conservative Party being the biggest party, they were one or two seats shorts of an overall majority. Not, incidentally, in England where they won by a landslide (but the English people have no England-only representation).
Subsequently, there was much discussion in darkened corridors and even fears that the odious Gordon Brown might have clung on to power as assorted Milibands and Mandelsons negotiated with character devoid Cleggs and Cables. Constantly on our screens was David Laws, sweeping in and out of buildings on Whitehall - brokering deals between assorted Tories and Labour. (He since had to resign from the front bench of Lib Dem political life following the expenses debacle).
Yes, you knew all this. Why are we mentioning it?
We thought we would mention it as we were wondering what was different about the direction for the country.
The faces have changed, but "the agenda" remains the same.
Diminished Parliament, laws dictated by Brussels: Check.
Knackered economy: Check.
International aid while our country's economy is crippled: Check.
Bailing out banks around the globe and letting the taxpayer suffer: Check.
Attacks on civil liberties and reductions in freedoms: Check (bar the cancelling of the Identity Card scheme).
Reduced standards of living and everyone taxed enough already: Check.
Deceptions regarding inflation figures that have no correlation to the reduction in our available disposable incomes: Check.
Exporting all industry and jobs overseas: Check.
Funding the great 'climate change' con: Check.
Influence of fake charities and lobby groups: Check.
Corruption: Check.
Bilderberg members aplenty in Cabinet: Check.
Smoking ban: Check.
I could go on and on and on and on...
...so too, no doubt, could you.
So, as we said, on Thursday 6th May 2010, we had a General Election. We kicked a ruddy awful Government out of power.
So who, pray tell, sets "the agenda"..?
Only, I cannot really tell the difference between this Government and the last one.
Can you?
So who DOES set "the agenda"..?
Only, it appears to me that you and I have no impact with our votes at the ballot box whatsoever.
We seem to have traded faces but is there really such a difference between Theresa May and Jacqui Smith? Can anyone wedge a Rizla between Bilderberg colleagues Ed Balls and George Osborne?
Just what is the difference between this Government and the last one? I can't tell. Can you?
Tuesday, 26 July 2011
Dear Brussels, we want our country back. Love from the people of Spain x
The people of Spain - who have, alongside the Greeks, provided a masterclass in political demonstrations (though with far less tear gas and violence than the Greeks have had to suffer) - are not giving up.
Not content with the occupation of Puerta del Sol in Madrid and city squares throughout the country, the plucky and determined Spanish people are now continuing their protest...
...and marching all the way to Brussels.
Euronews offers up the briefest of reports for us... but even in their tiny clip, see how many 'EU-sceptic' banners you can spot:
Naturally, in Britain, the 'left' is (ab)using (exploiting) the events of a rampaging mass murderer in Norway to label those opposed to the undemocratic, totalitarian and corrupt European Empire. Such political opposition to the European Empire is currently being bundled up as "extremist" and akin to Satanic worship and eating small babies...
..so we give big praise indeed to the people of Spain who, due to the British people currently being neutered, protest on behalf of us all.
By the time they reach Brussels for their protest in October, we expect more nationalities to be represented than enter the Eurovision Song Contest.
Unfortunately, we British will not be allowed to attend as we are clearly evil extremist worshippers of Beelzebub for believing in self-determination and democracy. Or, at least, I think that's what The Guardian were suggesting.
Anyway, ¡Buena suerte a todos de gentes de España!
Footnote: Nick Clegg's wife is Spanish. We don't expect her to join her fellow countrymen and women at this protest.
See also:
Prison Planet.com - EU Exploits Norway Massacre to Stifle Dissent
Not content with the occupation of Puerta del Sol in Madrid and city squares throughout the country, the plucky and determined Spanish people are now continuing their protest...
...and marching all the way to Brussels.
Euronews offers up the briefest of reports for us... but even in their tiny clip, see how many 'EU-sceptic' banners you can spot:
Naturally, in Britain, the 'left' is (ab)using (exploiting) the events of a rampaging mass murderer in Norway to label those opposed to the undemocratic, totalitarian and corrupt European Empire. Such political opposition to the European Empire is currently being bundled up as "extremist" and akin to Satanic worship and eating small babies...
..so we give big praise indeed to the people of Spain who, due to the British people currently being neutered, protest on behalf of us all.
By the time they reach Brussels for their protest in October, we expect more nationalities to be represented than enter the Eurovision Song Contest.
Unfortunately, we British will not be allowed to attend as we are clearly evil extremist worshippers of Beelzebub for believing in self-determination and democracy. Or, at least, I think that's what The Guardian were suggesting.
Anyway, ¡Buena suerte a todos de gentes de España!
Footnote: Nick Clegg's wife is Spanish. We don't expect her to join her fellow countrymen and women at this protest.
See also:
Prison Planet.com - EU Exploits Norway Massacre to Stifle Dissent
Monday, 25 July 2011
Confused by the news? "Problem, Reaction, Solution" Explained
The following is a talk that David Icke gave in the by-election called when David Davis MP resigned his seat in Haltemprice and Howden to put the issue of the 'Big Brother' state into the spotlight.
It seems timely to share it with you here now as it probably explains perfectly what you're watching on your news right now.
If you've never listened to David Icke before, do listen to this talk.
Invest in yourself.
If all around you seems crazy, unfathomable and as if everything is out of control, then watch this. Problem, Reaction, Solution... explained.
This is three hours long. If you haven't the time, come back to it later.
First They Came - Pastor Martin Niemoller
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
With thanks to WatchDocumentary.com for the reminder of this excellent David Icke talk.
It seems timely to share it with you here now as it probably explains perfectly what you're watching on your news right now.
If you've never listened to David Icke before, do listen to this talk.
Invest in yourself.
If all around you seems crazy, unfathomable and as if everything is out of control, then watch this. Problem, Reaction, Solution... explained.
This is three hours long. If you haven't the time, come back to it later.
First They Came - Pastor Martin Niemoller
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
With thanks to WatchDocumentary.com for the reminder of this excellent David Icke talk.
Sunday, 24 July 2011
Spanish Revolution LIVE - Part #2
They're back... the Spanish people have turned out in force, again, to try to reclaim their democracy and shape their own destiny:
Quote of the Day: 24th July 2011
"The notion of an administration led by the Euro-eunuchs Cameron and Osborne, with their bags carried by that bloke from the school run who is married to some Spanish woman, engaging in realpolitik in Brussels is as probable as John Prescott delivering a grammatical sentence. Cameron has already reneged on a "cast-iron" promise to give the electorate a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. He is hardly likely to alienate the Brussels nomenklatura now. Eurosceptic Tory backbenchers indulging in roseate fantasies about Dave clawing back powers from the EU represent the triumph of claret over experience."
- Gerald Warner on fine form for The Scotsman
See also:
Daily Telegraph - The euro bail-out is a conspiracy against democracy
- Gerald Warner on fine form for The Scotsman
See also:
Daily Telegraph - The euro bail-out is a conspiracy against democracy
Don't hate the politicians! Only they can save you from blacks, whites, Christians, Muslims and the middle classes!
Yesterday, following the terrible events in Norway, much finger pointing was being done at "right wing extremists" and "Christian fundamentalists".
We, at this blog, urged caution.
This morning, in the Independent on Sunday, there's a story which causes us to raise an eyebrow or three.
It is a report on preparations for the Olympic Games in London 2012 and it states:
"Organisers of next year's Olympics believe there is a greater threat of disruption to the Games from anarchist protesters than Islamist terrorism, The Independent on Sunday has learned."
The paper goes on to name the 'anarchist' group which is a bigger threat than Al Qaeda (according to what they want us to believe)..
"But planners are braced for widespread disruption to transport, security and the sporting events themselves by groups such as UK Uncut, which led the student-fees protests last year."
So, forgive me if I'm extrapolating this out too far, but we have a report in which a left wing "extremist" group - UK Uncut - is being placed on a par with Al Qaeda the day after right wing "extremist" groups were under scrutiny following the events in Norway.
Sorry to get all "conspiracy theory" on this, but what's this all about? Have any sort of political opinion that is not authorised by Government and we'll declare you a terrorist?
On Friday, the Daily Mail picked up on huge anger in the United States after Homeland Security launched a video which appears to promote the idea that white, middle class Americans are the biggest terrorist threat to the U.S.
"...the controversial video has angered some Americans due to the fact all the actors who play the would-be terrorists in the video are white, and the people who report them are either black, Asian or Arab," the report states.
So, after years of 'the Islamist bogeyman is coming to get you!', we now have... the evil right wing is coming to get you, the evil left wing is coming to get you and the evil middle class white American is coming to get you.
What could the solution possibly be? Could - maybe - the Government that none of us trust anymore be our saviour..?
I smell a rat...
We, at this blog, urged caution.
This morning, in the Independent on Sunday, there's a story which causes us to raise an eyebrow or three.
It is a report on preparations for the Olympic Games in London 2012 and it states:
"Organisers of next year's Olympics believe there is a greater threat of disruption to the Games from anarchist protesters than Islamist terrorism, The Independent on Sunday has learned."
The paper goes on to name the 'anarchist' group which is a bigger threat than Al Qaeda (according to what they want us to believe)..
"But planners are braced for widespread disruption to transport, security and the sporting events themselves by groups such as UK Uncut, which led the student-fees protests last year."
So, forgive me if I'm extrapolating this out too far, but we have a report in which a left wing "extremist" group - UK Uncut - is being placed on a par with Al Qaeda the day after right wing "extremist" groups were under scrutiny following the events in Norway.
Sorry to get all "conspiracy theory" on this, but what's this all about? Have any sort of political opinion that is not authorised by Government and we'll declare you a terrorist?
On Friday, the Daily Mail picked up on huge anger in the United States after Homeland Security launched a video which appears to promote the idea that white, middle class Americans are the biggest terrorist threat to the U.S.
"...the controversial video has angered some Americans due to the fact all the actors who play the would-be terrorists in the video are white, and the people who report them are either black, Asian or Arab," the report states.
So, after years of 'the Islamist bogeyman is coming to get you!', we now have... the evil right wing is coming to get you, the evil left wing is coming to get you and the evil middle class white American is coming to get you.
What could the solution possibly be? Could - maybe - the Government that none of us trust anymore be our saviour..?
I smell a rat...
Saturday, 23 July 2011
It's best not to rush to judgment over the Norway nutter (a confirmed Freemason, by the way)
In the immediate moments following the outrages in Norway that have now claimed so many innocent lives, there has been a rush to jump to the wrong conclusion.
The first responses were an assumption that the appalling attacks were the actions of an Islamist "jihadi" group - an assumption helped along the way by some never-before-heard-of-by-most-people apparently Islamist 'group' claiming, falsely for propaganda, that they were responsible.
It led to early editions of The Sun to call the bombing and mass murder "Norways 9/11".
As it became clear that a white, Norwegian national was involved, mainstream media and broadcasters speculated about whether 'Al Qaeda' had recruited white skinned Westerners to their warped cause.
That everyday individuals were using social media to proclaim all sorts of conclusions was hardly surprising, given that the so-called "experts" were so wide of the mark.
Apart from expressing our sympathies and empathy for those in Norway who were caught up in the horror, we have remained silent about the matter.
It all takes me back to the day when Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead in Stockwell.
Having listened to the media repeat the police briefings, I remarked to a neighbour - having heard that a terrorist in a bomb belt had been shot at Stockwell - that: "They got one of the bastards, anyway."
My neighbour was quiet and gave a cynical 'hum'. He cautioned that it was wiser to wait and see.
So it transpired. Jean Charles de Menezes was not an Islamist, was not a terrorist and was not wearing a bomb belt complete with visible wires (as had been reported).
Which all brings us back to Norway and Anders Behring Breivik.
Now, some of the detail here is curious.
We find it incredibly strange - remarkable - that one twisted individual could have planned, organised and carried through so much carnage all on their own.
The next interesting thing came very early. The first pixelated picture of the man transmitted round the world last night appears to have been a pixelated version of this one:
For those who don't know, this is the uniform of a freemason.
Prison Planet.com notes that: "Some people are claiming this is a photoshop, but if it is then it must have been done by Breivik himself, because it was posted on his original Facebook and is now being used by mainstream newspapers like the Daily Mail."
We also know that there is no controversy or "conspiracy theory" about whether he was a freemason. It is confirmed.
Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet carries quotes from Harald Manheim, the Head Mason of the St. Olaus of the Three Pillars lodge; the masonic order of which Breivik was a member. (No, we really don't make this twaddle up).
He tells the newspaper (via Google translation): "I can confirm that he is a member of the Masonic Order and is part of our lodge. Controversial religious and political issues we are not talking about [in] the Masonic Order. So that side of him has not emerged, I can guarantee. We have a system that shall ensure that [those] kind of people do not get access, but I'm shocked today, so I have to get down [to] the Secretariat and to investigate further."
So, what do we know beyond this? We know that a video was circulating on You Tube which was one of those typically demented, anti-Muslim rants set to cheesy music. Contained within the few seconds of the clip that we watched (it has now been pulled) were references to the Knights Templar.
It is claimed that this You Tube video was made or uploaded by the Norweigan nutter - but the name on the You Tube account was not his... and it seems out of character that he would use a false name, as we shall later see. He certainly was quite happy to identify himself fully on Facebook and Twitter. Why change his identity for You Tube?
Stick with it... I know this sounds insane but this is what we're dealing with.
The wisdom of Wikipedia tells us that: "Unlike the initial degrees conferred in a Masonic Lodge, which only require a belief in a Supreme Being regardless of religious affiliation, the Knights Templar is one of several additional Masonic Orders in which membership is open only to Freemasons who profess a belief in the Christian religion."
Mainstream media in the UK is hinting at the freemason link (but saying it is not confirmed) and mentioning that the Norway nutter is a "Christian fundamentalist".
Now, controversial or not, membership of freemasonic lodges is reputed to consist of people in the top ranks of society - judges, politicians, police, lawyers... and even some members of royalty.
The freemasons themselves would argue with this. One UK masonic lodge - said to be connected to the Queen's cousin, Prince Michael of Kent - says on the front page of it's website: "People from all walks of life become Freemasons for a variety of reasons. Some are attracted by the valuable work that the movement performs in raising money for charity. A proportion of these funds is used to assist Freemasons and their dependents in times of need, particularly the sick and the elderly, but the greater part goes to non Masonic charities – local, national and international. Freemasons also assist the community in more direct ways, such as carrying out voluntary work. Others become Freemasons because of the unique fellowship it provides. Visit a Masonic lodge anywhere in the country – or indeed, the world – and you are greeted as an old friend. Freemasonry is the ultimate leveller, a community where friendship and goodwill are paramount."
For those who will dismiss the royal masonic link as "conspiracy theory", do grow up. The official website of Prince Michael of Kent states it quite clearly. No conspiracy. No theory. He lists his masonic interests quite openly.
So, what more can we tie in with Anders Behring Breivik..? Curiously, given the composition of freemasons allegedly of the elites, he was - widely reported - to have been wearing a policeman's uniform when he went on his mindless and evil shooting rampage.
Now, some media reporting is saying that the nutter was a "right wing" extremist - something that will no doubt be lazily extrapolated everywhere by people who have no idea what "left wing" and "right wing" mean.
Such claims about the "right wing" are already widespread over the internet - without reference to left wing terror groups in Europe and without reference to the environment terrorists who launched an attack on the Discovery Channel not so long back.
Anders Behring Breivik is, undoubtedly, a warped racist - and that has nothing to do with the eighteenth century French Court which is where the terms "left wing" and "right wing" come from.
His anger seems directed at the political classes, angered at their imposition of multiculturalism on Norway.
That his anger should have been directed at a defenceless holidaying political youth movement taking such a toll of innocent life is shocking.
We send our thoughts and sympathies to all those caught up in the terrible events that we have seen unfold on our screens but which the Norwegian people have seen unfold on their streets and in their lives.
Praise must go to the Norwegian Prime Minister who, instead of responding as George W. Bush and Tony Blair did after 9/11, has vowed that he will bring MORE democracy to Norway.
More democracy - engaging all people's viewpoints - might stop people developing their frustrations to utterly mindless extremes.
Instead, we fear that we may still see the opposite - more draconian curtailing of civil liberties.
The last point leads us on to one curiosity that makes alarm bells ring.
It would appear - if everything is as it seems - that this Norwegian, freemasonic, racist murderer went on a bizarre social media blitz before committing his atrocities.
Facebook seem to have been quite quick in making his profile vanish - a profile on which he listed our very own Churchill amongst his interests. Those who have seen it say the profile he had there was only set up in the last few days.
So too was his Twitter account. We've found and taken a screenshot of his Twitter account.
He has tweeted only once - on the 17th July.
He writes: "One person with a belief is equal to a force of 100 000 who have only interests."
This is an almost direct citation of a line attributed to Stuart John Mill, a nineteenth century British philosopher, economist and civil servant.
For a Norwegian, this guy has a strange interest in our former Prime Minister (according to Facebook) and our nineteenth century libertarian theorists; way beyond those of most English people, in fact.
Had you heard of Stuart John Mill before today?
And for a "right wing", "racist", Norwegian nationalist, he certainly seems to be using a curiously large amount of English rather than his own mother tongue. A racist nationalist who prefers to speak in what is, to him, a foreign language?
Here is a screen grab of the guy's Twitter account:
Now, if I were suspicious and cynical, I might think that this recent creation of social media accounts and lone entries was a starting point. It is almost as though we were meant to find these things.
Some would say that the perpetrator wanted the world to find these things.
Others might think it has the hallmarks of a false flag operation.
Time will tell.
Back to Stuart John Mill, the liberal theorist quoted on that Twitter page.
Wikipedia tells us that: "Mill's On Liberty addresses the nature and limits of the power that can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. One argument that Mill develops further than any previous philosopher is the harm principle. The harm principle holds that each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others."
Clearly, on that latter point, Breivik is a failure.
As for the death and carnage at his alleged hand, he appears to even be a failure as a human being.
But is everything quite what it seems?
Time will tell.
The first responses were an assumption that the appalling attacks were the actions of an Islamist "jihadi" group - an assumption helped along the way by some never-before-heard-of-by-most-people apparently Islamist 'group' claiming, falsely for propaganda, that they were responsible.
It led to early editions of The Sun to call the bombing and mass murder "Norways 9/11".
As it became clear that a white, Norwegian national was involved, mainstream media and broadcasters speculated about whether 'Al Qaeda' had recruited white skinned Westerners to their warped cause.
That everyday individuals were using social media to proclaim all sorts of conclusions was hardly surprising, given that the so-called "experts" were so wide of the mark.
Apart from expressing our sympathies and empathy for those in Norway who were caught up in the horror, we have remained silent about the matter.
It all takes me back to the day when Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead in Stockwell.
Having listened to the media repeat the police briefings, I remarked to a neighbour - having heard that a terrorist in a bomb belt had been shot at Stockwell - that: "They got one of the bastards, anyway."
My neighbour was quiet and gave a cynical 'hum'. He cautioned that it was wiser to wait and see.
So it transpired. Jean Charles de Menezes was not an Islamist, was not a terrorist and was not wearing a bomb belt complete with visible wires (as had been reported).
Which all brings us back to Norway and Anders Behring Breivik.
Now, some of the detail here is curious.
We find it incredibly strange - remarkable - that one twisted individual could have planned, organised and carried through so much carnage all on their own.
The next interesting thing came very early. The first pixelated picture of the man transmitted round the world last night appears to have been a pixelated version of this one:
For those who don't know, this is the uniform of a freemason.
Prison Planet.com notes that: "Some people are claiming this is a photoshop, but if it is then it must have been done by Breivik himself, because it was posted on his original Facebook and is now being used by mainstream newspapers like the Daily Mail."
We also know that there is no controversy or "conspiracy theory" about whether he was a freemason. It is confirmed.
Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet carries quotes from Harald Manheim, the Head Mason of the St. Olaus of the Three Pillars lodge; the masonic order of which Breivik was a member. (No, we really don't make this twaddle up).
He tells the newspaper (via Google translation): "I can confirm that he is a member of the Masonic Order and is part of our lodge. Controversial religious and political issues we are not talking about [in] the Masonic Order. So that side of him has not emerged, I can guarantee. We have a system that shall ensure that [those] kind of people do not get access, but I'm shocked today, so I have to get down [to] the Secretariat and to investigate further."
So, what do we know beyond this? We know that a video was circulating on You Tube which was one of those typically demented, anti-Muslim rants set to cheesy music. Contained within the few seconds of the clip that we watched (it has now been pulled) were references to the Knights Templar.
It is claimed that this You Tube video was made or uploaded by the Norweigan nutter - but the name on the You Tube account was not his... and it seems out of character that he would use a false name, as we shall later see. He certainly was quite happy to identify himself fully on Facebook and Twitter. Why change his identity for You Tube?
Stick with it... I know this sounds insane but this is what we're dealing with.
The wisdom of Wikipedia tells us that: "Unlike the initial degrees conferred in a Masonic Lodge, which only require a belief in a Supreme Being regardless of religious affiliation, the Knights Templar is one of several additional Masonic Orders in which membership is open only to Freemasons who profess a belief in the Christian religion."
Mainstream media in the UK is hinting at the freemason link (but saying it is not confirmed) and mentioning that the Norway nutter is a "Christian fundamentalist".
Now, controversial or not, membership of freemasonic lodges is reputed to consist of people in the top ranks of society - judges, politicians, police, lawyers... and even some members of royalty.
The freemasons themselves would argue with this. One UK masonic lodge - said to be connected to the Queen's cousin, Prince Michael of Kent - says on the front page of it's website: "People from all walks of life become Freemasons for a variety of reasons. Some are attracted by the valuable work that the movement performs in raising money for charity. A proportion of these funds is used to assist Freemasons and their dependents in times of need, particularly the sick and the elderly, but the greater part goes to non Masonic charities – local, national and international. Freemasons also assist the community in more direct ways, such as carrying out voluntary work. Others become Freemasons because of the unique fellowship it provides. Visit a Masonic lodge anywhere in the country – or indeed, the world – and you are greeted as an old friend. Freemasonry is the ultimate leveller, a community where friendship and goodwill are paramount."
For those who will dismiss the royal masonic link as "conspiracy theory", do grow up. The official website of Prince Michael of Kent states it quite clearly. No conspiracy. No theory. He lists his masonic interests quite openly.
So, what more can we tie in with Anders Behring Breivik..? Curiously, given the composition of freemasons allegedly of the elites, he was - widely reported - to have been wearing a policeman's uniform when he went on his mindless and evil shooting rampage.
Now, some media reporting is saying that the nutter was a "right wing" extremist - something that will no doubt be lazily extrapolated everywhere by people who have no idea what "left wing" and "right wing" mean.
Such claims about the "right wing" are already widespread over the internet - without reference to left wing terror groups in Europe and without reference to the environment terrorists who launched an attack on the Discovery Channel not so long back.
Anders Behring Breivik is, undoubtedly, a warped racist - and that has nothing to do with the eighteenth century French Court which is where the terms "left wing" and "right wing" come from.
His anger seems directed at the political classes, angered at their imposition of multiculturalism on Norway.
That his anger should have been directed at a defenceless holidaying political youth movement taking such a toll of innocent life is shocking.
We send our thoughts and sympathies to all those caught up in the terrible events that we have seen unfold on our screens but which the Norwegian people have seen unfold on their streets and in their lives.
Praise must go to the Norwegian Prime Minister who, instead of responding as George W. Bush and Tony Blair did after 9/11, has vowed that he will bring MORE democracy to Norway.
More democracy - engaging all people's viewpoints - might stop people developing their frustrations to utterly mindless extremes.
Instead, we fear that we may still see the opposite - more draconian curtailing of civil liberties.
The last point leads us on to one curiosity that makes alarm bells ring.
It would appear - if everything is as it seems - that this Norwegian, freemasonic, racist murderer went on a bizarre social media blitz before committing his atrocities.
Facebook seem to have been quite quick in making his profile vanish - a profile on which he listed our very own Churchill amongst his interests. Those who have seen it say the profile he had there was only set up in the last few days.
So too was his Twitter account. We've found and taken a screenshot of his Twitter account.
He has tweeted only once - on the 17th July.
He writes: "One person with a belief is equal to a force of 100 000 who have only interests."
This is an almost direct citation of a line attributed to Stuart John Mill, a nineteenth century British philosopher, economist and civil servant.
For a Norwegian, this guy has a strange interest in our former Prime Minister (according to Facebook) and our nineteenth century libertarian theorists; way beyond those of most English people, in fact.
Had you heard of Stuart John Mill before today?
And for a "right wing", "racist", Norwegian nationalist, he certainly seems to be using a curiously large amount of English rather than his own mother tongue. A racist nationalist who prefers to speak in what is, to him, a foreign language?
Here is a screen grab of the guy's Twitter account:
Now, if I were suspicious and cynical, I might think that this recent creation of social media accounts and lone entries was a starting point. It is almost as though we were meant to find these things.
Some would say that the perpetrator wanted the world to find these things.
Others might think it has the hallmarks of a false flag operation.
Time will tell.
Back to Stuart John Mill, the liberal theorist quoted on that Twitter page.
Wikipedia tells us that: "Mill's On Liberty addresses the nature and limits of the power that can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. One argument that Mill develops further than any previous philosopher is the harm principle. The harm principle holds that each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others."
Clearly, on that latter point, Breivik is a failure.
As for the death and carnage at his alleged hand, he appears to even be a failure as a human being.
But is everything quite what it seems?
Time will tell.
Friday, 22 July 2011
SENSATIONAL DIANA BREAKTHROUGH: French Judge wants top British cops arrested for withholding the Mishcon note!!!
A sensational development in the ongoing and necessarily relentless campaign to see justice for Diana.
We won't steal the front page exclusive of the Daily Express. You can read it in the paper or online HERE.
Put short, the French want two of Britain's top cops arrested and sent to France for questioning over the with-holding of the Mishcon note!
The Daily Express explains that: "Under French law, “removing or concealing” evidence, which could “facilitate the discovery of a crime”, is punishable by three to five years in jail or a fine."
At this blog, we have kept on and on and on about the suppression of the Mishcon note.
To that end, we are overjoyed at this development and we cannot thank or praise the French authorities enough and - in particular - Judge Gerard Caddeo.
We TOTALLY support the French authorities in wanting these cops arrested and quizzed over what they did with the Mishcon note.
However, we also want the French 'paparazzi' arrested and pumped for information on who those still unidentified indivduals were on or in 'pursuing vehicles' on the night of Diana's unlawful killing.
Fourteen years! Fourteen years of crying and trying and battling against the non-believers and the downright evil. We never let you down, Diana! We were called 'conspiracy theorists' and generally insulted, but we've NEVER given up!
Fourteen years! Please, let this be the beginnings of justice for Diana!
All along the line, only one newspaper has been brave enough to keep on the fight - taking lots of criticism along the way. So, bravo and well done, Daily Express! And well done to Team Fayed and all campaigners for justice for our Princess!!
The biggest crime and cover-up of the twentieth cenury might be about to unravel!
Diana, if you're watching down... told you we would not ever give up or let you down. x
Thursday, 21 July 2011
End of Term Report: Our Top of the Class and naughty brats of the House of Commons
Since the General Election, we've been keeping an eye on our Members of Parliament, following their major votes in the House of Commons for our 'M.P. Watch' page and tallying those votes and one or two of their other actions - brilliant or, more usually, incredibly annoying - into a points table.
Generally, they get one 'plus' point for a major vote we agree with, one minus point where we strongly oppose them.
Here then is the end of term report - the M.P.s who are doing well... and those Members of Parliament that we're putting on a concerned watchlist.
If you know this blog and our politics, then these are our lists of people to watch. The politicians who are trying to put the 'Great' back into the - ummm - UK... and the swine who keep stuffing our country up.
What is fascinating is that Labour are hardly showing in either the 'good' or 'bad' extremes, apart from one Labour MP who actually makes our 'good MP' top ten.
The Liberal Democrats are clearly the enemy of all things England and liberty, racking up a huge chunk of the places on our 'naughty' list... where they are joined by a surprisingly high number of Conservative Party MPs.
We think we will have to dub the Conservatives 'The Schizophrenic Party'...
Top of the Class:
Generally, they get one 'plus' point for a major vote we agree with, one minus point where we strongly oppose them.
Here then is the end of term report - the M.P.s who are doing well... and those Members of Parliament that we're putting on a concerned watchlist.
If you know this blog and our politics, then these are our lists of people to watch. The politicians who are trying to put the 'Great' back into the - ummm - UK... and the swine who keep stuffing our country up.
What is fascinating is that Labour are hardly showing in either the 'good' or 'bad' extremes, apart from one Labour MP who actually makes our 'good MP' top ten.
The Liberal Democrats are clearly the enemy of all things England and liberty, racking up a huge chunk of the places on our 'naughty' list... where they are joined by a surprisingly high number of Conservative Party MPs.
We think we will have to dub the Conservatives 'The Schizophrenic Party'...
Top of the Class:
1. Douglas Carswell +13
2. Philip Davies +10
3. Bill Cash +9
3. David Nuttall +9
5. Christopher Chope +8
5. Gordon Henderson +8
7. Steve Baker +7
7. Ronnie Campbell +7
7. David Davis +7
7. Jeffrey Donaldson +7
7. Zac Goldsmith +7
7. Andrew Turner +7
Naughty Brats - Headmaster's Report:
650th. Tom Brake -9650th. Dr. Julian Huppert -9
650th. Alan Reid -9
647th. Sir Alan Beith -8
647th. Stephen Williams -8
645th. Annette Brooke -7
645th. Malcolm Bruce -7
645th. Jane Ellison -7 (call yourself a Conservative?)
645th. Don Foster -7
645th. George Hollingbery -7 (call yourself a Conservative?)
645th. Simon Hughes -7
645th. Margot James -7 (call yourself a Conservative?)
645th. Tessa Munt -7
645th. Dan Rogerson -7
645th. Sir Robert Smith -7
645th. John Stevenson -7 (call yourself a Conservative?)
645th. Mel Stride -7 (call yourself a Conservative?)
645th. Ian Swales -7
645th. David Ward -7
645th. Simon Wright -7
More confirmation: All would-be traitors at Westminster MUST respect the constitutional laws in the Bill of Rights 1689
We keep finding examples of it being confirmed - the wannabe traitors at Westminster are indeed bound by the Bill of Rights 1689. This exchange from the debate yesterday on phone hacking... [source: Hansard]
See that? Even a Prime Minister saying they might not be able to answer a question about the Bill of Rights? Quite easy, Dave. Read the ruddy thing - and then cancel all of those unlawful signatures on European Union documents. The EU is unlawful and not valid here. The Bill of Rights - and the treason laws - say so.
No referendum required.
Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab): Sue Akers, who is now in charge of the investigation, says that what broke the logjam of the cover-up was the civil cases that were taken by individuals forcing disclosure by News International. Part of the problem, and one of the reasons we have all failed in this over the past 20 years, is the fact that News International and Metropolitan police officers directly lied to Parliament, and the Select Committees were either unable to or did not do anything about it. One of the problems with the Leveson situation is that, because of the Bill of Rights 1689, he will not be able to consider whether Parliament was lied to. We are the only people who can decide that. Will the Prime Minister ensure that there is a point at which we in this House can make that decision?
The Prime Minister: The hon. Gentleman is making an important point. His recognition that this is a 20-year issue in which politicians of all parties have not stepped up to the mark is wholly to his credit. I want to take away his question of parliamentary privilege and the Bill of Rights and give him a considered response to it, because I do not want the inquiry to be prevented in any way from getting to the truth. Our constituents would not understand if there were some process, however important it might be historically, that could prevent that from happening.
The second home truth is that none of these questions is restricted to Britain. Right across the world, there is a problem of ensuring that police forces are accountable to the Government yet independent from them. We must never compromise operational independence. This goes to some of the questions that I was asked earlier. We must not move to a system in which politicians can step in to say, “Why haven’t you re-run this investigation?” or “Why haven’t you arrested that person?” We need to think for a moment where that would lead. But that makes it all the more important that police leadership is strong, and that the police are called to account when they fail. That is why we are introducing directly elected police and crime commissioners, to bring proper accountability to policing.
...
Mr William Cash (Stone) (Con): Will my right hon. Friend give way?
The Prime Minister: I have got a feeling that it will be a question about the Bill of Rights that I will not be able to answer — but I am going to try it anyway.
Mr Cash: I am glad to say that it is about not the Bill of Rights but the terms of reference that are now in the Library.
See that? Even a Prime Minister saying they might not be able to answer a question about the Bill of Rights? Quite easy, Dave. Read the ruddy thing - and then cancel all of those unlawful signatures on European Union documents. The EU is unlawful and not valid here. The Bill of Rights - and the treason laws - say so.
No referendum required.
Wednesday, 20 July 2011
If we must have a 'media inquiry' distraction, then the BBC must be at the centre of it
Most neutral political commentators who actually watched the whole debate on 'hackgate' in Parliament today (actually a special PMQs with a same-topic debate afterwards) would probably concede that it was a barnstormingly good day for David Cameron.
Having looked fatally exposed and even attracting money at bookmakers on his impending career doom, Cameron somehow managed to make himself look like a true leader and a statesman.
That this was the outcome says more about the ineptitude and the partisan witch hunt attempted by the tribal lunatics occupying the Labour Party benches than it actually said about David Cameron - a man for whom this blog feels no great affection, at all.
Those who didn't watch the debate will be led by some news organisations with agendas to believe that David Cameron looked dodgy, full of guilt and shame - due to what will no doubt be selective quoting and highlighting of tiny extracts from a full three hour personal tour-de-force at the despatch box.
That selective cherry-picking for promoting a biased news agenda is nothing new. Though there are some leftist, Labour supporting news organisations that are especially guilty of it.
The entire 'hackgate' affair is something that the Labour Party and it's media cheerleaders howled into existence and the result is a number of inquiries - including a number of ongoing police inquiries.
That it was a Labour Party member who attacked 80-year old Rupert Murdoch and turned him from a widely despised figure into an object of sympathy in the status of victim just a day before this debate should have been a warning sign to Ed Miliband.
However, so tribal are they in that party, they probably did not sense that we - the majority of non-Labour supporting people - are tarring them ALL with the same brush and, knowing that the expenses fraud cases have mostly resulted in Labour MPs being prosecuted and sent to jail, they are hardly whiter than white.
Indeed, to pretend that the party which gave us spin doctor after government by press release after media pumped lies (for example, about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction) is not party to the whole media whoring game is incredibly damaging to the Labour opportunists. That it might backfire spectacularly would be a suitable outcome.
Today was not a day that the Labour Party will look to as a moment of rehabilitation. Certainly, they will have their many tribal supporters who would never vote for anyone else anyway.
But the small number of floating voters - those who win or lose elections for the LibLabCon - are not known for backing hypocrites; nor are they incapable of spotting them.
Indeed, one of the biggest hypocrites in the whole 'hackgate' scandal is the BBC.
The taxpayer funded organisation - which extorts payments from the public at threat of imprisonment - is well known for it's lack of impartiality. Nowhere is this more acute than in the great European Union conspiracy where only the pro-EU line is churned out - to the constant annoyance of English patriots who are forced to fund the organisation.
So, any media inquiry must now essentially get to the root of the EU-funding question. Links to the EU over funding are constantly questioned over the internet, so it is time that any judge and panel of expert witnesses investigated the extent and nature of this.
The same must be applied when it comes to the organisation's employment and recruitment policies.
There is a perception that the organisation is over-run with left-wing supporting personnel. The inquiry, triggered by a Labour-generated firestorm, must examine the extent to which the BBC recruits from the political left and - should it transpire that such claims are unfounded - then further questions about the perception must be asked and followed.
So, too, must such an inquiry look at recruitment of studio audiences by third party content providers. Any non-Labour supporter who has watched the 'flagship' Question Time over the last year or two will surely be of the mind that the studio audience - which we all know is researched - is deliberately packed with disproportionate numbers of left-wing activists. The practise must be highlighted and, if proven, must be regulated to stop it happening.
There are a whole host of topics on which BBC impartiality is non-existent - not least is the whole issue of 'climate change' - a topic on which the BBC has turned into a campaigning organisation; conduct well beyond it's remit and charter.
It is probably a good thing for democracy for Rupert Murdoch and his empire to be brought down to size and diminished.
Yet before the tribal Labour leftists celebrate, we hope that they get what they wished for - true democracy and accountability.
The huge empire of the BBC, full of it's bias, propaganda and agenda, must certainly take centre stage in any media inquiry and - for the good of the country - must face up to the prospect of being broken up and dismantled. The near monopoly that such a biased organisation has over news content must end and be broken up - just as Murdoch's empire must be.
After all, so poor is the standard of balance in BBC output, many of us who don't wish to be force fed left wing politics are now obtaining our impartial news via RT.
That we have had to turn to a Russian broadcaster for more balanced reporting than given by the taxpayer funded BBC says all that you need to know.
Perhaps some of us actually want to hear both sides of a story and to make our own minds up - not to have it made up for us by taxpayer funded organisations with an unstated political agenda.
Having looked fatally exposed and even attracting money at bookmakers on his impending career doom, Cameron somehow managed to make himself look like a true leader and a statesman.
That this was the outcome says more about the ineptitude and the partisan witch hunt attempted by the tribal lunatics occupying the Labour Party benches than it actually said about David Cameron - a man for whom this blog feels no great affection, at all.
Those who didn't watch the debate will be led by some news organisations with agendas to believe that David Cameron looked dodgy, full of guilt and shame - due to what will no doubt be selective quoting and highlighting of tiny extracts from a full three hour personal tour-de-force at the despatch box.
That selective cherry-picking for promoting a biased news agenda is nothing new. Though there are some leftist, Labour supporting news organisations that are especially guilty of it.
The entire 'hackgate' affair is something that the Labour Party and it's media cheerleaders howled into existence and the result is a number of inquiries - including a number of ongoing police inquiries.
That it was a Labour Party member who attacked 80-year old Rupert Murdoch and turned him from a widely despised figure into an object of sympathy in the status of victim just a day before this debate should have been a warning sign to Ed Miliband.
However, so tribal are they in that party, they probably did not sense that we - the majority of non-Labour supporting people - are tarring them ALL with the same brush and, knowing that the expenses fraud cases have mostly resulted in Labour MPs being prosecuted and sent to jail, they are hardly whiter than white.
Indeed, to pretend that the party which gave us spin doctor after government by press release after media pumped lies (for example, about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction) is not party to the whole media whoring game is incredibly damaging to the Labour opportunists. That it might backfire spectacularly would be a suitable outcome.
Today was not a day that the Labour Party will look to as a moment of rehabilitation. Certainly, they will have their many tribal supporters who would never vote for anyone else anyway.
But the small number of floating voters - those who win or lose elections for the LibLabCon - are not known for backing hypocrites; nor are they incapable of spotting them.
Indeed, one of the biggest hypocrites in the whole 'hackgate' scandal is the BBC.
The taxpayer funded organisation - which extorts payments from the public at threat of imprisonment - is well known for it's lack of impartiality. Nowhere is this more acute than in the great European Union conspiracy where only the pro-EU line is churned out - to the constant annoyance of English patriots who are forced to fund the organisation.
So, any media inquiry must now essentially get to the root of the EU-funding question. Links to the EU over funding are constantly questioned over the internet, so it is time that any judge and panel of expert witnesses investigated the extent and nature of this.
The same must be applied when it comes to the organisation's employment and recruitment policies.
There is a perception that the organisation is over-run with left-wing supporting personnel. The inquiry, triggered by a Labour-generated firestorm, must examine the extent to which the BBC recruits from the political left and - should it transpire that such claims are unfounded - then further questions about the perception must be asked and followed.
So, too, must such an inquiry look at recruitment of studio audiences by third party content providers. Any non-Labour supporter who has watched the 'flagship' Question Time over the last year or two will surely be of the mind that the studio audience - which we all know is researched - is deliberately packed with disproportionate numbers of left-wing activists. The practise must be highlighted and, if proven, must be regulated to stop it happening.
There are a whole host of topics on which BBC impartiality is non-existent - not least is the whole issue of 'climate change' - a topic on which the BBC has turned into a campaigning organisation; conduct well beyond it's remit and charter.
It is probably a good thing for democracy for Rupert Murdoch and his empire to be brought down to size and diminished.
Yet before the tribal Labour leftists celebrate, we hope that they get what they wished for - true democracy and accountability.
The huge empire of the BBC, full of it's bias, propaganda and agenda, must certainly take centre stage in any media inquiry and - for the good of the country - must face up to the prospect of being broken up and dismantled. The near monopoly that such a biased organisation has over news content must end and be broken up - just as Murdoch's empire must be.
After all, so poor is the standard of balance in BBC output, many of us who don't wish to be force fed left wing politics are now obtaining our impartial news via RT.
That we have had to turn to a Russian broadcaster for more balanced reporting than given by the taxpayer funded BBC says all that you need to know.
Perhaps some of us actually want to hear both sides of a story and to make our own minds up - not to have it made up for us by taxpayer funded organisations with an unstated political agenda.
Sean Hoare: After Diana, Dr. David Kelly, Tomlinson, and Jean Charles de Menezes...
While the eyes of the world were concentrated on the Tiswas happenings in the House of Commons - a moronic attack on an 80-year-old bloke by a typically violent leftist now suspended from the Labour Party - something connected to 'Hackgate' was happening elsewhere.
It was the police announcement that there was "no third party" involved in the suspiciously "unsuspicious" death of News of the World whistle blower Sean Hoare.
The Daily Mail kept their eye on the ball and they should be praised for their report in which it is revealed that Hoare feared for his life.
They quote a "friend and neighbour" who says of Hoare: "He would talk about someone from the Government coming to get him. He’d say to me, “If anyone comes by, don’t say I’m in”."
It is difficult not to draw parallels with Diana who left notes with Paul Burrell, her lawyer and - according to what we've been told - other people too, stating that she feared her life was in danger and that a staged accident in a car would be used to cause her harm. The Met Police - at the centre of the 'Hackgate' scandal - kept their copy of the Mishcon note secret in a safe for years, doing nothing to act on it at all. Only the publication by the Daily Mirror of Paul Burrell's note spurred them into coughing the lawyer's note of Diana's assassination fears into the open.
Just as Diana was accused of paranoia - despite being spookily and totally correct - the neighbour quoted apparently labels Hoare's fears as paranoia, too.
"He did mention he was paranoid and would mention conspiracy stuff," the newspaper cites the 'neighbour' as saying.
Similarly, allegations related to drink and drugs have been widely circulated about Hoare - in just the same way as they were circulated about Diana's driver Henri Paul; a man who turned out to be a French intelligence informer and who, post-mortem revealed, had inexplicable and unfathomably high levels of carbon monoxide in his blood that would have rendered him incapable of walking were they to be accurate.
We know all about Dr. David Kelly - details of his death under lock and key for seventy years, because there's "nothing suspicious" about his alleged suicide; irrespective of anything a panel of medical experts might want to say.
Same as newspaper vendor Ian Tomlinson - nothing suspicious, move right along, we were trying to help him... until that pesky American tourist video was handed to The Guardian. Then the truth came out.
Jean Charles de Menezes - at the time, he was an 'Islamist terrorist' wearing a suicide bomb belt shot by heroic cops. Only later did it emerge that he was simply an unarmed Brazilian who had overstayed his visa and he was shot repeatedly at point blank range while obviously unarmed.
As with Diana and Richard Tomlinson, intrusive CCTV failed to capture the moment. So we're told.
Add into the mix former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook who went for a walk in the hills and died suddenly - days after revealing that 'Al Qaeda' was created and set up by the CIA.
So, good luck in selling Sean Hoare's death to the British public as anything other than a dark and dastardly deed by evil and wicked men... can't think why most British people will not be inclined to believe any official account of events.
Can't think why the British people will not trust anything they are told by police or politicians at all. Can you?
-
Praise must also go to the Daily Mail for being brave enough to go it alone, using the front page of their print edition to write a piece which echoes our own post of yesterday - noting that the real story is that of criminal banksters and the spectre of impending financial Armaggedon...
Shame that only the Daily Mail - of the entire media set - has the real story that will effect us all on it's front page.
It was the police announcement that there was "no third party" involved in the suspiciously "unsuspicious" death of News of the World whistle blower Sean Hoare.
The Daily Mail kept their eye on the ball and they should be praised for their report in which it is revealed that Hoare feared for his life.
They quote a "friend and neighbour" who says of Hoare: "He would talk about someone from the Government coming to get him. He’d say to me, “If anyone comes by, don’t say I’m in”."
It is difficult not to draw parallels with Diana who left notes with Paul Burrell, her lawyer and - according to what we've been told - other people too, stating that she feared her life was in danger and that a staged accident in a car would be used to cause her harm. The Met Police - at the centre of the 'Hackgate' scandal - kept their copy of the Mishcon note secret in a safe for years, doing nothing to act on it at all. Only the publication by the Daily Mirror of Paul Burrell's note spurred them into coughing the lawyer's note of Diana's assassination fears into the open.
Just as Diana was accused of paranoia - despite being spookily and totally correct - the neighbour quoted apparently labels Hoare's fears as paranoia, too.
"He did mention he was paranoid and would mention conspiracy stuff," the newspaper cites the 'neighbour' as saying.
Similarly, allegations related to drink and drugs have been widely circulated about Hoare - in just the same way as they were circulated about Diana's driver Henri Paul; a man who turned out to be a French intelligence informer and who, post-mortem revealed, had inexplicable and unfathomably high levels of carbon monoxide in his blood that would have rendered him incapable of walking were they to be accurate.
We know all about Dr. David Kelly - details of his death under lock and key for seventy years, because there's "nothing suspicious" about his alleged suicide; irrespective of anything a panel of medical experts might want to say.
Same as newspaper vendor Ian Tomlinson - nothing suspicious, move right along, we were trying to help him... until that pesky American tourist video was handed to The Guardian. Then the truth came out.
Jean Charles de Menezes - at the time, he was an 'Islamist terrorist' wearing a suicide bomb belt shot by heroic cops. Only later did it emerge that he was simply an unarmed Brazilian who had overstayed his visa and he was shot repeatedly at point blank range while obviously unarmed.
As with Diana and Richard Tomlinson, intrusive CCTV failed to capture the moment. So we're told.
Add into the mix former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook who went for a walk in the hills and died suddenly - days after revealing that 'Al Qaeda' was created and set up by the CIA.
So, good luck in selling Sean Hoare's death to the British public as anything other than a dark and dastardly deed by evil and wicked men... can't think why most British people will not be inclined to believe any official account of events.
Can't think why the British people will not trust anything they are told by police or politicians at all. Can you?
-
Praise must also go to the Daily Mail for being brave enough to go it alone, using the front page of their print edition to write a piece which echoes our own post of yesterday - noting that the real story is that of criminal banksters and the spectre of impending financial Armaggedon...
Shame that only the Daily Mail - of the entire media set - has the real story that will effect us all on it's front page.
Tuesday, 19 July 2011
And while the Hackgate fire rages, the UK banks may be about to collapse (again)...
Well, yesterday was fascinating.
The two most senior cops in Britain said 'Hullo, hullo, hullo' for the final time and one of them was immediately replaced by a woman on whose watch Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes was gunned down by a lawless armed mob at Stockwell tube station.
Boris wobbled, Dave went nuclear and Ed Milibland displayed the advanced stages of fantasylalaland when - for political gain - he pretended in front of the world's live TV cameras that he has a close personal friendship with the family of Milly Dowler.
In and amongst this, Dr. David Kelly the Second was found after the News of the World whistle blower Sean Hoare was discovered dead at home in suspiciously "unsuspicious" circumstances.
Meanwhile, away from the general circus, Portugal declared a war of words on Brussels, Italy was suspended from the testicles by banksters and the poor Greeks were left hawking some old terracotta pots in order to try and feed themselves. No change there, then.
Yet later today - or this week - six further horsemen of the apocalypse could still be set to gallop through the Brussels controlled UN-enclave that was once known as Great Britain.
Yup, the globalists didn't loot us all enough last time. They're coming back for more.
Max Keiser points to a post at Zero Hedge in which they warn that Lloyds Banking Group - the company that looted the Treasury of almost every tax penny ever coughed up by an unwilling British public - could be about to topple.
They write: "...based on today's action at Sigma X, the next, and probably biggest domino may be about to fall: the UK itself, because coming in at position #2, just behind UniCredit, we see Lloyds Banking. And if Lloyds goes, the ones that will follow are Barclays and RBS. At that point, the financial crisis goes global."
If you haven't yet stocked your cupboards up with some genetically modified crap with zero nutritional value (especially after the implementation of Codex Alimentarius) nor filled up a few carcinogenic plastic bottles with poisonous, fluoridated water, now might be the time to do so.
The shit is certainly hurtling through the air towards that fan at an incredibly mind-blowing speed.
Anyway, back to the News of the World...
The two most senior cops in Britain said 'Hullo, hullo, hullo' for the final time and one of them was immediately replaced by a woman on whose watch Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes was gunned down by a lawless armed mob at Stockwell tube station.
Boris wobbled, Dave went nuclear and Ed Milibland displayed the advanced stages of fantasylalaland when - for political gain - he pretended in front of the world's live TV cameras that he has a close personal friendship with the family of Milly Dowler.
In and amongst this, Dr. David Kelly the Second was found after the News of the World whistle blower Sean Hoare was discovered dead at home in suspiciously "unsuspicious" circumstances.
Meanwhile, away from the general circus, Portugal declared a war of words on Brussels, Italy was suspended from the testicles by banksters and the poor Greeks were left hawking some old terracotta pots in order to try and feed themselves. No change there, then.
Yet later today - or this week - six further horsemen of the apocalypse could still be set to gallop through the Brussels controlled UN-enclave that was once known as Great Britain.
Yup, the globalists didn't loot us all enough last time. They're coming back for more.
Max Keiser points to a post at Zero Hedge in which they warn that Lloyds Banking Group - the company that looted the Treasury of almost every tax penny ever coughed up by an unwilling British public - could be about to topple.
They write: "...based on today's action at Sigma X, the next, and probably biggest domino may be about to fall: the UK itself, because coming in at position #2, just behind UniCredit, we see Lloyds Banking. And if Lloyds goes, the ones that will follow are Barclays and RBS. At that point, the financial crisis goes global."
If you haven't yet stocked your cupboards up with some genetically modified crap with zero nutritional value (especially after the implementation of Codex Alimentarius) nor filled up a few carcinogenic plastic bottles with poisonous, fluoridated water, now might be the time to do so.
The shit is certainly hurtling through the air towards that fan at an incredibly mind-blowing speed.
Anyway, back to the News of the World...
Monday, 18 July 2011
Apologies, Recriminations, Investigations, Resignations... but what's in it all for we, the people?
Perhaps like most British people, this blogger has watched the varying developments in the phone hacking mediastorm with varying responses from bemusement to repulsion.
We've seen a 168 year old newspaper close down, editors arrested, top cops resigning... followed by the unsavoury sight of Ed Milibland trying to boost his own personal standing by distastefully pretending to be on first name terms with the family of Milly Dowler and exploiting them for political gain in the process.
Now, while many of us are no doubt taking great amusement from watching the elite fall from grace on such a wholesale scale, what does it all mean?
The near-enough criminal banking system was the first to fall. Despite their conduct, their reaction was to loot the Treasury and continue with business as normal.
Then we had the MPs expenses row. A vast number of the 650 MPs were implicated in fraudulent expense claims. Yet only a small handful were prosecuted.
Is anything really going to fundamentally change for the good of we, the people, from the Hackgate scandal?
Probably not.
The banksters will still be crooks. The politicians will still be beholden to their paymasters. Our democracy will still be a charade, dictate to us by unelected totalitarians in Brussels with the full backing and complicity of Westminster and Whitehall.
The BBC will continue to exert undue influence and demand taxpayers money with menaces in order to do so. It will continue to be a hugely impartial judge of all things extreme far leftist while attacking anything that isn't the pipe dream of the Guardianistas.
You get the picture? There is not a precedent for anything like we're currently witnessing.
Despite this, we are not rushing to celebrate as some of our fellow citizens may feel inclined to do.
The reason being that the corruption, the privileges, the lust for power and the contempt for we, the people is so deep and so deeply invested that it is difficult to imagine anything other than a few token heads to roll onto plates, but then for business to carry on as normal.
Expect the usual pattern of cover-ups to kick in at some point soon.
With nothing in the process for we, the people... who will continue to be spied upon, catalogued and monitored by public servants to such a shocking and wholesale level that the News International gangs look like mere cheeky schoolchildren.
We've seen a 168 year old newspaper close down, editors arrested, top cops resigning... followed by the unsavoury sight of Ed Milibland trying to boost his own personal standing by distastefully pretending to be on first name terms with the family of Milly Dowler and exploiting them for political gain in the process.
Now, while many of us are no doubt taking great amusement from watching the elite fall from grace on such a wholesale scale, what does it all mean?
The near-enough criminal banking system was the first to fall. Despite their conduct, their reaction was to loot the Treasury and continue with business as normal.
Then we had the MPs expenses row. A vast number of the 650 MPs were implicated in fraudulent expense claims. Yet only a small handful were prosecuted.
Is anything really going to fundamentally change for the good of we, the people, from the Hackgate scandal?
Probably not.
The banksters will still be crooks. The politicians will still be beholden to their paymasters. Our democracy will still be a charade, dictate to us by unelected totalitarians in Brussels with the full backing and complicity of Westminster and Whitehall.
The BBC will continue to exert undue influence and demand taxpayers money with menaces in order to do so. It will continue to be a hugely impartial judge of all things extreme far leftist while attacking anything that isn't the pipe dream of the Guardianistas.
You get the picture? There is not a precedent for anything like we're currently witnessing.
Despite this, we are not rushing to celebrate as some of our fellow citizens may feel inclined to do.
The reason being that the corruption, the privileges, the lust for power and the contempt for we, the people is so deep and so deeply invested that it is difficult to imagine anything other than a few token heads to roll onto plates, but then for business to carry on as normal.
Expect the usual pattern of cover-ups to kick in at some point soon.
With nothing in the process for we, the people... who will continue to be spied upon, catalogued and monitored by public servants to such a shocking and wholesale level that the News International gangs look like mere cheeky schoolchildren.
Sunday, 17 July 2011
Sunday Paper Review: 17th July 2011
It was with some trepidation that we started with this week's Sunday newspaper review. How many 'Hackgate' stories can one possibly cope with?
Would it not be simpler just to conclude that the entire top tiers of British society and influence are corrupt to the core? The media owners, the politicians, the banksters, even the police. We're all watching, we're all learning more and more. And we're all quite rightly repulsed by the entire lot of them.
So, any other stories around?
Well, we did laugh out loud at a statement from the Sunday Telegraph which labels the often invisible Foreign Secretary William Hague as: "...the Cabinet's leading Eurosceptic."
God help us, if that's the case. Only, three sentences beforehand in the same report, we are informed that Hague's stated view is: "...we should be in the EU but not run by the EU. Despite everything that is wrong with it, and there is a great deal that is, the European Union offers a lot for Britain."
Really? Like what?
Sorry William (you great, prize pilchard)... we tried, once, to like you. However, not any more. It's quite clear that you do not and will not represent the will of the people of this country on the European Union matter.
Please, if you (or if any of your political pals) cannot or will not carry out the wishes of the British people, you have no alternative but to resign. You are not fit for public service if you will not do the bidding of the people.
Or, at least, that used to be the case back when politicians were honourable. Sometime pre-1972, wasn't it..?
We searched and searched and searched the newspapers for detail of the protests yesterday, staged by the Irish people against the EU-IMF bankster looting.
Media, governments, banksters, fraud, corruption... and not a mention of the people taking to the streets of Dublin. Same as happened with Madrid and Greece. It's as if the powers-that-be are determined that the British people aren't given any ideas.
So, let us be grateful for small mercies and the briefest of mentions of the Enough Campaign's anti-EU-IMF-bankster protest in The People.
Meanwhile, the Sunday Mirror reports on how: "Labour leader Ed Miliband is sending top aides to the White House to get election-winning tips from the team of US President Barack Obama."
I could have saved them the time and trouble.
Find a candidate with a bit of charisma with excellent autocue reading skills, give him as much money as his Wall Street masters will cough up and - lo and behold - you're President of the United States.
Of course, it does help if the candidate in question has an original copy of their birth certificate to hand - for the avoidance of any future doubt.
Milibland has the puppet role sorted - not backed by the Wall Street banksters (yet) of course, but a puppet of the trade unions to whom he owes his victory over his treacherous brother.
Naturally however, Ed Milibland falls at the first hurdle on our list of required criteria for winning an election - he's never really going to manage to win in the 'charisma' stakes, is he? An hour with Hannibal Lecter or a week with Ed Milibland... the choice is yours. I know which I'd go for. Fly little Starling, fly...
David Beckham and former Spice Girl wife Victoria are the target of eugenicist attacks in The Observer.
We've told you before that there really is a sinister sounding organisation called the 'Optimum Population Trust', haven't we? Yes. Whenever we mention their existence and outlook on 'the street', we get astonished gasps from people who think such an idea is really abhorrent.
Yet that very real organisation (Google them) - who have David Attenborough as one of their most prominent front men - are name checked in The Observer today in an article largely devoted to Green MP Caroline Lucas attacking the Beckhams for being poor role models because they have committed the evil crime of... having had four children.
I mean, goodness grief.
Yes, this is the level the 'eco-crusaders' and others like them have descended to.
I've never read anything so ridiculous in my entire life, to be honest. Nor as repugnant. Where will this lunatic argument end? Enforced population culling?
Probably. Give it twenty years.
If all the eco-extremists really feel that strongly about population reduction, I've a very good suggestion in mind for them which would both resolve their consciences and give the rest of us a happier and more peaceful life...
And finally... not much in the News of the World today. Can't think why. Any ideas, anyone?
Would it not be simpler just to conclude that the entire top tiers of British society and influence are corrupt to the core? The media owners, the politicians, the banksters, even the police. We're all watching, we're all learning more and more. And we're all quite rightly repulsed by the entire lot of them.
So, any other stories around?
Well, we did laugh out loud at a statement from the Sunday Telegraph which labels the often invisible Foreign Secretary William Hague as: "...the Cabinet's leading Eurosceptic."
God help us, if that's the case. Only, three sentences beforehand in the same report, we are informed that Hague's stated view is: "...we should be in the EU but not run by the EU. Despite everything that is wrong with it, and there is a great deal that is, the European Union offers a lot for Britain."
Really? Like what?
Sorry William (you great, prize pilchard)... we tried, once, to like you. However, not any more. It's quite clear that you do not and will not represent the will of the people of this country on the European Union matter.
Please, if you (or if any of your political pals) cannot or will not carry out the wishes of the British people, you have no alternative but to resign. You are not fit for public service if you will not do the bidding of the people.
Or, at least, that used to be the case back when politicians were honourable. Sometime pre-1972, wasn't it..?
We searched and searched and searched the newspapers for detail of the protests yesterday, staged by the Irish people against the EU-IMF bankster looting.
Media, governments, banksters, fraud, corruption... and not a mention of the people taking to the streets of Dublin. Same as happened with Madrid and Greece. It's as if the powers-that-be are determined that the British people aren't given any ideas.
So, let us be grateful for small mercies and the briefest of mentions of the Enough Campaign's anti-EU-IMF-bankster protest in The People.
Meanwhile, the Sunday Mirror reports on how: "Labour leader Ed Miliband is sending top aides to the White House to get election-winning tips from the team of US President Barack Obama."
I could have saved them the time and trouble.
Find a candidate with a bit of charisma with excellent autocue reading skills, give him as much money as his Wall Street masters will cough up and - lo and behold - you're President of the United States.
Of course, it does help if the candidate in question has an original copy of their birth certificate to hand - for the avoidance of any future doubt.
Milibland has the puppet role sorted - not backed by the Wall Street banksters (yet) of course, but a puppet of the trade unions to whom he owes his victory over his treacherous brother.
Naturally however, Ed Milibland falls at the first hurdle on our list of required criteria for winning an election - he's never really going to manage to win in the 'charisma' stakes, is he? An hour with Hannibal Lecter or a week with Ed Milibland... the choice is yours. I know which I'd go for. Fly little Starling, fly...
David Beckham and former Spice Girl wife Victoria are the target of eugenicist attacks in The Observer.
We've told you before that there really is a sinister sounding organisation called the 'Optimum Population Trust', haven't we? Yes. Whenever we mention their existence and outlook on 'the street', we get astonished gasps from people who think such an idea is really abhorrent.
Yet that very real organisation (Google them) - who have David Attenborough as one of their most prominent front men - are name checked in The Observer today in an article largely devoted to Green MP Caroline Lucas attacking the Beckhams for being poor role models because they have committed the evil crime of... having had four children.
I mean, goodness grief.
Yes, this is the level the 'eco-crusaders' and others like them have descended to.
I've never read anything so ridiculous in my entire life, to be honest. Nor as repugnant. Where will this lunatic argument end? Enforced population culling?
Probably. Give it twenty years.
If all the eco-extremists really feel that strongly about population reduction, I've a very good suggestion in mind for them which would both resolve their consciences and give the rest of us a happier and more peaceful life...
And finally... not much in the News of the World today. Can't think why. Any ideas, anyone?
Saturday, 16 July 2011
Campaign To Make the EU Flag History
Sometimes, we're a little bit slow on the uptake, we Brits.
For years, our own sense of justice and fair play, our consideration for other people's feelings have been - to our cost - exploited and played.
Such sensitivity on our part and exploitation by those with unfathomable agendas led, for a long period (that some would argue is still ongoing), to our being embarrassed or ashamed to fly the flag of St. George or the Union flag; fearful that we would be open to accusations of racism.
So, what if we were to turn this on it's head... and make our feelings about the European Union flag known and subject the hideous and offensive symbol to the same stigma that was applied to our own flags?
Certainly, seeing the European Union flag causes in me feelings of alarm. It is a political symbol which makes me feel that I am under totalitarian harassment and - combined with other issues - the sight of the European Union flag causes me to feel distress.
Seeing the European Union flag makes me feel offended and I see it as a symbol of racist persecution of people who are English.
I therefore feel that I would be quite right approaching any public or private building or organisation displaying the European Union flag and asking them to remove the offensive symbol from display.
This, my friends, is an idea in infancy - open to your nurturing and development.
However, it would not be false to state that the European Union flag causes many of us to feel distressed and agitated, so the claim that the flag is offensive and should be removed is not a vexatious one.
Therefore, England... here's the plan.
A campaign to use the same methods used to suppress the English and Union flags; except this time, used by us to see the removal of the European Union flag from every corner of England.
A campaign to make the European Union flag history on the British Isles.
Are you in?
If so, all you have to do is to complain every single time you see that flag on any building or business anywhere in the country.
Our Westminster and Whitehall traitors won't get the message... but there's more than one way of using people power. Especially businesses and public buildings. Think about it. They won't like us all boycotting places which display a European Union flag or symbol.
Let's make the European Union flag history.
Complain, complain, complain every time you see it.
For years, our own sense of justice and fair play, our consideration for other people's feelings have been - to our cost - exploited and played.
Such sensitivity on our part and exploitation by those with unfathomable agendas led, for a long period (that some would argue is still ongoing), to our being embarrassed or ashamed to fly the flag of St. George or the Union flag; fearful that we would be open to accusations of racism.
So, what if we were to turn this on it's head... and make our feelings about the European Union flag known and subject the hideous and offensive symbol to the same stigma that was applied to our own flags?
Certainly, seeing the European Union flag causes in me feelings of alarm. It is a political symbol which makes me feel that I am under totalitarian harassment and - combined with other issues - the sight of the European Union flag causes me to feel distress.
Seeing the European Union flag makes me feel offended and I see it as a symbol of racist persecution of people who are English.
I therefore feel that I would be quite right approaching any public or private building or organisation displaying the European Union flag and asking them to remove the offensive symbol from display.
This, my friends, is an idea in infancy - open to your nurturing and development.
However, it would not be false to state that the European Union flag causes many of us to feel distressed and agitated, so the claim that the flag is offensive and should be removed is not a vexatious one.
Therefore, England... here's the plan.
A campaign to use the same methods used to suppress the English and Union flags; except this time, used by us to see the removal of the European Union flag from every corner of England.
A campaign to make the European Union flag history on the British Isles.
Are you in?
If so, all you have to do is to complain every single time you see that flag on any building or business anywhere in the country.
Our Westminster and Whitehall traitors won't get the message... but there's more than one way of using people power. Especially businesses and public buildings. Think about it. They won't like us all boycotting places which display a European Union flag or symbol.
Let's make the European Union flag history.
Complain, complain, complain every time you see it.
Quote of the Day: 16th July 2011
"The wellbeing of millions of Europeans is being sacrificed by an out-of-touch, self-serving political elite, and what’s shocking is that our politicians are going along with it."
- Douglas Carswell
It's called 'treason', Douglas. But we're all watching and knitting; in us all, the spirit of Madame Defarge...
Anyway, spot-on again, Mr. Carswell. Respect and hats off to you - that kind of thing.
- Douglas Carswell
It's called 'treason', Douglas. But we're all watching and knitting; in us all, the spirit of Madame Defarge...
Anyway, spot-on again, Mr. Carswell. Respect and hats off to you - that kind of thing.
New, improved Talking Clock site...
Just in time for the Armageddon about to descend upon us (caused by the politicians and the banksters), we thought we'd spruce The Talking Clock up a little for you all.
New interactive elements - easy share buttons and... gosh!... a Twitter account for people to follow.
On the subject of Twitter, we did go through every single one of our neighbouring blogs last night looking for their Twitter feeds - if we found it, we added you. If we didn't, apologies - it's nothing personal. Just follow us and we'll follow back. The Twitter gadget is over there --> in the sidebar.
Hope that you like the fresher look site and that it's more pleasing on the eye.
And, while this is a rare event, thank you to all the fellow bloggers who link to us, our regular readers, and an extra special 'thank you' to those extra special people (you know who you are!) who take the time, trouble and effort to comment on this blog's posts and articles. We don't say it too often, but it really is appreciated - so thank you.
Keep reading... together, we'll get our country's sovereignty, freedoms and liberties back.
TTC x
New interactive elements - easy share buttons and... gosh!... a Twitter account for people to follow.
On the subject of Twitter, we did go through every single one of our neighbouring blogs last night looking for their Twitter feeds - if we found it, we added you. If we didn't, apologies - it's nothing personal. Just follow us and we'll follow back. The Twitter gadget is over there --> in the sidebar.
Hope that you like the fresher look site and that it's more pleasing on the eye.
And, while this is a rare event, thank you to all the fellow bloggers who link to us, our regular readers, and an extra special 'thank you' to those extra special people (you know who you are!) who take the time, trouble and effort to comment on this blog's posts and articles. We don't say it too often, but it really is appreciated - so thank you.
Keep reading... together, we'll get our country's sovereignty, freedoms and liberties back.
TTC x
Friday, 15 July 2011
Did you know... [Banksters Edition]
Did you know...
...every time you submit a valid complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service about your bank...
...the bank in question has to pay the Financial Ombudsman Service the sum of £500.
Now, you might think this a good way to make banks pay.
However...
If I were to give a High Court Judge or a Magistrate the sum of £500 and ask them to look at something for me, do you think that would be acceptable?
Or do you think I would be prone to receiving a prison sentence and, if so, what do you think the offence would be called?
Only sayin'...
And don't take my word for it - ask your Member of Parliament if what I've just told you is true; this sum of £500 per complaint.
Interesting, no?
...every time you submit a valid complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service about your bank...
...the bank in question has to pay the Financial Ombudsman Service the sum of £500.
Now, you might think this a good way to make banks pay.
However...
If I were to give a High Court Judge or a Magistrate the sum of £500 and ask them to look at something for me, do you think that would be acceptable?
Or do you think I would be prone to receiving a prison sentence and, if so, what do you think the offence would be called?
Only sayin'...
And don't take my word for it - ask your Member of Parliament if what I've just told you is true; this sum of £500 per complaint.
Interesting, no?
Dear Doris Pack, on behalf of the British people, we would like to accept your offer to let the UK quit the EU. Thank you.
In a statement to bring hope and rejoicing throughout Britain, she confirmed what we all knew anyway - that Britain can leave the monstrous EU.
If you look at the video clip (below), her facial expressions seem to demonstrate what the European Empire think of we British anyway. She barely conceals an apparent dislike of the British.
Therefore, with great rejoicing, Frau Pack, on behalf of the people of Britain, I would like to accept your invitation for Britain to quit the EU. Tell me where I sign..? If it has to be an elected leader, we'll bypass the quislings if you don't mind and we nominate Boris as an authorised signatory.
So, being serious - traitors of Westminster and Whitehall... you know what the people of Britain want, the European Empire obviously wouldn't miss us (they'd only miss our money)... what do we have to do to get you treacherous lot in Westminster and Whitehall to do the service of the public who you are meant to serve?
Getting too big a personal pay packet through treachery, are you? There can be no other credible reason for us to still be party to the undemocratic corrupt and hideous beast that is the European Union.
The full story can be found in the Daily Express and online here - the UKIP clip is below:
Thursday, 14 July 2011
Exclusive: Labour, Conservatives and Lib Dems caught in fresh hacking scandal
The Labour Party, the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats were embroiled in fresh controversy today after allegations of them conducting clandestine, privacy invading hacking programs were proven to be true.
The three political parties - branches of and operating under the branding of the parental Government Corporation - have been listening in to private telephone conversations of members of the public for years, it was revealed.
Evidence unearthed by investigators also reveals that the Government Corporation has also been compiling lists of who it is you speak to on the telephone, no matter whether the conversation is confidential regarding your medical complaints or during times of personal grief.
In a further scandal, it has been revealed that the Government Corporation has been compiling details of every single email that you send and receive. It has also been logging details of every single website that you have visited.
The scandal deepened today when it was also revealed that the entire country has been mapped out with sophisticated spy cameras that track your every single move. The Government Corporation devices - more commonly known as CCTV - are located all over the country and not an inch of the country is not covered by their monitoring capabilities. Even urinals in public toilets are covered by the technology. A Government Corporation spokesperson was not available to apologise for the embarrassment.
Further controversy erupted when it emerged that the Government Corporation is making extensive use of criminal organised gangs known as 'public sector workers' who have been complicit in covert surveillance practises through the placing of monitoring devices in household dustbins. These dustbins are often rummaged through by these gangs, looking for stories of wrongdoing to punish members of the public over. Government Corporation is also employing people to trail innocent parents to and from the school gate and - worse still - had planned to microchip the entire population with compulsory biometric identity cards, documents show.
Yet more outrage was declared when it was revealed that a vast database containing the DNA of most people in the country had been harvested by employees of Government Corporation for many years. International courts have declared the practise illegal and while the Government Corporation was meant to have stopped the practise, it has been continuing in defiance of the laws prohibiting such intrusions.
Databases also have been compiled logging everywhere that you go on your summer holidays. It is alleged that some employees of Government Corporation have been randomly selecting some members of the public for the ritual humiliation of having to walk through machines which take naked photos of people before being allowed to travel outside of the permitted Government Corporation zones from airports. One Government Corporation spokesperson who asked to remain anonymous said that these 'naked body scanners' did not store any naked images, but could not explain how examples of such images had been posted on the internet.
When asked to explain allegations of sexual groping of members of the public by Government Corporation employees at the same airports, the Government Corporation said it was 'all for the greater good' and that 'the people should enjoy it'.
In addition, the Government Corporation is believed to have employed huge gangs of snoopers and spies whose job it is to report every movement of an individual in the hope of getting a story of the tiniest misdemeanour. A member of the public caught dropping a sweet wrapper is often subject to blackmail - to either hand over money demanded with menaces else see their name splashed across the newspapers having had to attend a court of law.
After these outrages were made public, the Government Corporation has said that it would temporarily withdraw it's bid to take over the Court Corporation until a review of it's suitability had been conducted... by the Government Corporation.
Shares in Government Corporation plunged today, while the Head of the Government Corporation was expected to fly in from head office in Brussels for emergency talks.
In other news, all three branches of the Government Corporation were accused of hypocrisy today after it emerged that...
The three political parties - branches of and operating under the branding of the parental Government Corporation - have been listening in to private telephone conversations of members of the public for years, it was revealed.
Evidence unearthed by investigators also reveals that the Government Corporation has also been compiling lists of who it is you speak to on the telephone, no matter whether the conversation is confidential regarding your medical complaints or during times of personal grief.
In a further scandal, it has been revealed that the Government Corporation has been compiling details of every single email that you send and receive. It has also been logging details of every single website that you have visited.
The scandal deepened today when it was also revealed that the entire country has been mapped out with sophisticated spy cameras that track your every single move. The Government Corporation devices - more commonly known as CCTV - are located all over the country and not an inch of the country is not covered by their monitoring capabilities. Even urinals in public toilets are covered by the technology. A Government Corporation spokesperson was not available to apologise for the embarrassment.
Further controversy erupted when it emerged that the Government Corporation is making extensive use of criminal organised gangs known as 'public sector workers' who have been complicit in covert surveillance practises through the placing of monitoring devices in household dustbins. These dustbins are often rummaged through by these gangs, looking for stories of wrongdoing to punish members of the public over. Government Corporation is also employing people to trail innocent parents to and from the school gate and - worse still - had planned to microchip the entire population with compulsory biometric identity cards, documents show.
Yet more outrage was declared when it was revealed that a vast database containing the DNA of most people in the country had been harvested by employees of Government Corporation for many years. International courts have declared the practise illegal and while the Government Corporation was meant to have stopped the practise, it has been continuing in defiance of the laws prohibiting such intrusions.
Databases also have been compiled logging everywhere that you go on your summer holidays. It is alleged that some employees of Government Corporation have been randomly selecting some members of the public for the ritual humiliation of having to walk through machines which take naked photos of people before being allowed to travel outside of the permitted Government Corporation zones from airports. One Government Corporation spokesperson who asked to remain anonymous said that these 'naked body scanners' did not store any naked images, but could not explain how examples of such images had been posted on the internet.
When asked to explain allegations of sexual groping of members of the public by Government Corporation employees at the same airports, the Government Corporation said it was 'all for the greater good' and that 'the people should enjoy it'.
In addition, the Government Corporation is believed to have employed huge gangs of snoopers and spies whose job it is to report every movement of an individual in the hope of getting a story of the tiniest misdemeanour. A member of the public caught dropping a sweet wrapper is often subject to blackmail - to either hand over money demanded with menaces else see their name splashed across the newspapers having had to attend a court of law.
After these outrages were made public, the Government Corporation has said that it would temporarily withdraw it's bid to take over the Court Corporation until a review of it's suitability had been conducted... by the Government Corporation.
Shares in Government Corporation plunged today, while the Head of the Government Corporation was expected to fly in from head office in Brussels for emergency talks.
In other news, all three branches of the Government Corporation were accused of hypocrisy today after it emerged that...
Spotted! Some news! In a British newspaper! (Britain to be the new Greece - report)
So, while most of the media continues with wall-to-wall News of the World...
...The Independent has cropped up and thrown a spanner in the works.
Some real news, of The Grim Reaper variety.
It reports: "A further austerity programme half as large again as the current package of tax hikes and public-spending cuts will be required to prevent a Greek-style debt crisis from overtaking Britain in the coming years, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).."
See here.
Don't panic, Mr. Mainwaring! Don't panic! Default on the debt! Those fuzzy-wuzzy banksters, they don't like it up 'em, Mr. Mainwaring...
Anyway, serious news aside, where were we? Oh yes. Knees up, Gordon Brown, knees up Gordon Brown... Knees up, knees up, never let the breeze up, Knees up Gordon Brown. Oh my, what a rotten song... and what a rotten singer too-oo-oooooh!
Anyone fancy doing a whip-round for the IMF..? Something like £20 billion should do it...
Meanwhile...
See also:
The Sun - 12p income tax hike...or Britain ‘goes bust’
Daily Mail - UK may be hit by new Irish bailout after its credit rating downgraded to 'junk'
...The Independent has cropped up and thrown a spanner in the works.
Some real news, of The Grim Reaper variety.
It reports: "A further austerity programme half as large again as the current package of tax hikes and public-spending cuts will be required to prevent a Greek-style debt crisis from overtaking Britain in the coming years, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).."
See here.
Don't panic, Mr. Mainwaring! Don't panic! Default on the debt! Those fuzzy-wuzzy banksters, they don't like it up 'em, Mr. Mainwaring...
Anyway, serious news aside, where were we? Oh yes. Knees up, Gordon Brown, knees up Gordon Brown... Knees up, knees up, never let the breeze up, Knees up Gordon Brown. Oh my, what a rotten song... and what a rotten singer too-oo-oooooh!
Anyone fancy doing a whip-round for the IMF..? Something like £20 billion should do it...
Meanwhile...
See also:
The Sun - 12p income tax hike...or Britain ‘goes bust’
Daily Mail - UK may be hit by new Irish bailout after its credit rating downgraded to 'junk'
Sit down, Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown turned up to the House of Commons today. And spoke in the chamber.
A rare event, by all accounts - despite him still being paid.
However, he was not there to represent his constituents. He was there to represent himself, as the losing loser of a Prime Minister who was never, ever elected to the Prime Minister's job.
Jon Craig of Sky News writes of his performance: "I'm exhausted! I've just left the Press Gallery after listening to 32 minutes of bile and bitterness pouring out of the mouth of Gordon Brown as he hijacked the Labour debate on BSkyB and phone hacking."
The Daily Telegraph write: "We had been given a glimpse of a man in torment: a man imprisoned by his own manic need to prove he was always in the right. How glum the Labour MPs sitting behind Mr Brown looked. They knew this was not the way to win friends and influence people, and were perhaps wondering how they could ever have allowed such an unbalanced man to become their leader."
The Daily Mail reveals how Gordon Brown: "...refused to answer questions about his own close relationship with the corporation's chief executive Rebekah Brooks. He attended her wedding, his wife Sarah helped arrange her 40th birthday and she and members of the Murdoch family were invited to a 'slumber party' at Chequers."
For all the pontificating and the holier than thou attitude displayed by the most uniformly despised British Prime Minister of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries combined, we have one little question for Gordon Brown and his moral compass...
On a scale of seriousness, how does hacking into your phone calls compare with the deaths of British troops fighting two illegal wars, killing thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan - the former being a war predicated on entirely fabricated premises?
Lose sleep over your phone calls and media image, Gordon. After all, the dead from illegal wars are dead already, right?
Repugnant man.
If you weren't British, you'd be on your way to The Hague by now with Tony and the rest of your cronies alongside you.
As for the Lisbon Treaty... unlawful signature. Treason.
Go away.
Shit Chancellor of the Exchequer, too.
A rare event, by all accounts - despite him still being paid.
However, he was not there to represent his constituents. He was there to represent himself, as the losing loser of a Prime Minister who was never, ever elected to the Prime Minister's job.
Jon Craig of Sky News writes of his performance: "I'm exhausted! I've just left the Press Gallery after listening to 32 minutes of bile and bitterness pouring out of the mouth of Gordon Brown as he hijacked the Labour debate on BSkyB and phone hacking."
The Daily Telegraph write: "We had been given a glimpse of a man in torment: a man imprisoned by his own manic need to prove he was always in the right. How glum the Labour MPs sitting behind Mr Brown looked. They knew this was not the way to win friends and influence people, and were perhaps wondering how they could ever have allowed such an unbalanced man to become their leader."
The Daily Mail reveals how Gordon Brown: "...refused to answer questions about his own close relationship with the corporation's chief executive Rebekah Brooks. He attended her wedding, his wife Sarah helped arrange her 40th birthday and she and members of the Murdoch family were invited to a 'slumber party' at Chequers."
For all the pontificating and the holier than thou attitude displayed by the most uniformly despised British Prime Minister of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries combined, we have one little question for Gordon Brown and his moral compass...
On a scale of seriousness, how does hacking into your phone calls compare with the deaths of British troops fighting two illegal wars, killing thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan - the former being a war predicated on entirely fabricated premises?
Lose sleep over your phone calls and media image, Gordon. After all, the dead from illegal wars are dead already, right?
Repugnant man.
If you weren't British, you'd be on your way to The Hague by now with Tony and the rest of your cronies alongside you.
As for the Lisbon Treaty... unlawful signature. Treason.
Go away.
Shit Chancellor of the Exchequer, too.
Wednesday, 13 July 2011
Traitor's Gate: The 274 MPs who voted for YOU to pay an extra £9½ billion to the International Mafia Gang
You didn't think we'd let this one pass without mention, did you?
On Monday, without so much as a debate, the House of Commons voted to DOUBLE the UK's contributions to the International Mafia Gang known as the IMF.
YOU - because it is YOUR money - are now funding these international crooks and sovereignty shredders to the tune of £20.15bn.
It was bad enough at £10.7bn, but these 274 just nodded through double.
Douglas Carswell, who voted against the madness - says: "Austerity at home, but a £9.2 Billion increase in our IMF subscription. Money for the supranational technocrats, but not for the folk who use local public services. Not good."
Here goes with the roll-call of shame... 274 to charge with treason, come the revolution.
AYES
Adams, Nigel
Afriyie, Adam
Aldous, Peter
Alexander, rh Danny
Amess, Mr David
Andrew, Stuart
Bacon, Mr Richard
Baker, Norman
Baldwin, Harriett
Barclay, Stephen
Barwell, Gavin
Bebb, Guto
Beith, rh Sir Alan
Bellingham, Mr Henry
Beresford, Sir Paul
Berry, Jake
Bingham, Andrew
Birtwistle, Gordon
Blackman, Bob
Blackwood, Nicola
Blunt, Mr Crispin
Boles, Nick
Bradley, Karen
Brake, Tom
Bray, Angie
Brazier, Mr Julian
Brine, Mr Steve
Brokenshire, James
Brooke, Annette
Bruce, Fiona
Bruce, rh Malcolm
Buckland, Mr Robert
Burns, Conor
Burns, rh Mr Simon
Burrowes, Mr David
Burstow, Paul
Burt, Lorely
Byles, Dan
Cairns, Alun
Campbell, rh Sir Menzies
Carmichael, rh Mr Alistair
Carmichael, Neil
Chishti, Rehman
Clark, rh Greg
Clarke, rh Mr Kenneth
Clifton-Brown, Geoffrey
Coffey, Dr Thérèse
Collins, Damian
Colvile, Oliver
Cox, Mr Geoffrey
Crabb, Stephen
Crockart, Mike
Crouch, Tracey
Davey, Mr Edward
Davies, David T. C. (Monmouth)
Davies, Glyn
de Bois, Nick
Dinenage, Caroline
Djanogly, Mr Jonathan
Doyle-Price, Jackie
Duddridge, James
Duncan, rh Mr Alan
Duncan Smith, rh Mr Iain
Ellis, Michael
Ellison, Jane
Ellwood, Mr Tobias
Elphicke, Charlie
Evans, Graham
Evans, Jonathan
Evennett, Mr David
Fabricant, Michael
Fallon, Michael
Featherstone, Lynne
Field, Mr Mark
Foster, rh Mr Don
Fox, rh Dr Liam
Francois, rh Mr Mark
Freer, Mike
Fullbrook, Lorraine
Gale, Mr Roger
Garnier, Mr Edward
Garnier, Mark
Gauke, Mr David
George, Andrew
Gibb, Mr Nick
Glen, John
Goodwill, Mr Robert
Gove, rh Michael
Graham, Richard
Grant, Mrs Helen
Grayling, rh Chris
Green, Damian
Greening, Justine
Gummer, Ben
Gyimah, Mr Sam
Hames, Duncan
Hammond, rh Mr Philip
Hammond, Stephen
Hancock, Matthew
Hancock, Mr Mike
Hands, Greg
Harper, Mr Mark
Harrington, Richard
Harris, Rebecca
Hart, Simon
Haselhurst, rh Sir Alan
Heald, Oliver
Heath, Mr David
Heaton-Harris, Chris
Hemming, John
Hendry, Charles
Hinds, Damian
Hoban, Mr Mark
Hollingbery, George
Holloway, Mr Adam
Hopkins, Kris
Howarth, Mr Gerald
Howell, John
Hughes, rh Simon
Huhne, rh Chris
Hunt, rh Mr Jeremy
Huppert, Dr Julian
Hurd, Mr Nick
Jackson, Mr Stewart
James, Margot
Javid, Sajid
Jenkin, Mr Bernard
Johnson, Gareth
Johnson, Joseph
Jones, Andrew
Jones, Mr David
Jones, Mr Marcus
Kawczynski, Daniel
Kennedy, rh Mr Charles
Kirby, Simon
Laing, Mrs Eleanor
Lamb, Norman
Lancaster, Mark
Latham, Pauline
Laws, rh Mr David
Leadsom, Andrea
Lee, Dr Phillip
Leech, Mr John
Lefroy, Jeremy
Leslie, Charlotte
Letwin, rh Mr Oliver
Lewis, Brandon
Liddell-Grainger, Mr Ian
Lidington, rh Mr David
Lilley, rh Mr Peter
Lloyd, Stephen
Lord, Jonathan
Loughton, Tim
Luff, Peter
Lumley, Karen
Macleod, Mary
Maude, rh Mr Francis
May, rh Mrs Theresa
Maynard, Paul
McIntosh, Miss Anne
McLoughlin, rh Mr Patrick
McPartland, Stephen
Mensch, Louise
Menzies, Mark
Mercer, Patrick
Metcalfe, Stephen
Miller, Maria
Milton, Anne
Mitchell, rh Mr Andrew
Moore, rh Michael
Mordaunt, Penny
Morgan, Nicky
Morris, Anne Marie
Morris, David
Morris, James
Mosley, Stephen
Mowat, David
Mulholland, Greg
Mundell, rh David
Munt, Tessa
Murray, Sheryll
Murrison, Dr Andrew
Neill, Robert
Newmark, Mr Brooks
Nokes, Caroline
Norman, Jesse
O'Brien, Mr Stephen
Ollerenshaw, Eric
Paice, rh Mr James
Parish, Neil
Patel, Priti
Paterson, rh Mr Owen
Penning, Mike
Penrose, John
Phillips, Stephen
Pickles, rh Mr Eric
Pincher, Christopher
Poulter, Dr Daniel
Prisk, Mr Mark
Pugh, John
Raab, Mr Dominic
Randall, rh Mr John
Rees-Mogg, Jacob
Reid, Mr Alan
Robathan, rh Mr Andrew
Robertson, Hugh
Robertson, Mr Laurence
Rogerson, Dan
Rudd, Amber
Ruffley, Mr David
Russell, Bob
Rutley, David
Sanders, Mr Adrian
Sandys, Laura
Scott, Mr Lee
Selous, Andrew
Shapps, rh Grant
Sharma, Alok
Shelbrooke, Alec
Simmonds, Mark
Simpson, Mr Keith
Skidmore, Chris
Smith, Miss Chloe
Smith, Henry
Smith, Julian
Smith, Sir Robert
Soames, Nicholas
Soubry, Anna
Spencer, Mr Mark
Stephenson, Andrew
Stevenson, John
Stewart, Iain
Stewart, Rory
Streeter, Mr Gary
Stride, Mel
Stunell, Andrew
Sturdy, Julian
Swales, Ian
Swayne, Mr Desmond
Swinson, Jo
Swire, rh Mr Hugo
Syms, Mr Robert
Thurso, John
Timpson, Mr Edward
Tomlinson, Justin
Tredinnick, David
Truss, Elizabeth
Tyrie, Mr Andrew
Uppal, Paul
Vaizey, Mr Edward
Vara, Mr Shailesh
Villiers, rh Mrs Theresa
Walker, Mr Robin
Wallace, Mr Ben
Walter, Mr Robert
Ward, Mr David
Watkinson, Angela
Weatherley, Mike
Webb, Steve
Wharton, James
Wheeler, Heather
White, Chris
Willetts, rh Mr David
Williams, Mr Mark
Williams, Roger
Williams, Stephen
Williamson, Gavin
Willott, Jenny
Wilson, Mr Rob
Wright, Jeremy
Wright, Simon
Yeo, Mr Tim
Young, rh Sir George
Zahawi, Nadhim
There you go. If you see them in the street, be sure to shout the word 'traitor' at them, won't you?
On Monday, without so much as a debate, the House of Commons voted to DOUBLE the UK's contributions to the International Mafia Gang known as the IMF.
YOU - because it is YOUR money - are now funding these international crooks and sovereignty shredders to the tune of £20.15bn.
It was bad enough at £10.7bn, but these 274 just nodded through double.
Douglas Carswell, who voted against the madness - says: "Austerity at home, but a £9.2 Billion increase in our IMF subscription. Money for the supranational technocrats, but not for the folk who use local public services. Not good."
Here goes with the roll-call of shame... 274 to charge with treason, come the revolution.
AYES
Adams, Nigel
Afriyie, Adam
Aldous, Peter
Alexander, rh Danny
Amess, Mr David
Andrew, Stuart
Bacon, Mr Richard
Baker, Norman
Baldwin, Harriett
Barclay, Stephen
Barwell, Gavin
Bebb, Guto
Beith, rh Sir Alan
Bellingham, Mr Henry
Beresford, Sir Paul
Berry, Jake
Bingham, Andrew
Birtwistle, Gordon
Blackman, Bob
Blackwood, Nicola
Blunt, Mr Crispin
Boles, Nick
Bradley, Karen
Brake, Tom
Bray, Angie
Brazier, Mr Julian
Brine, Mr Steve
Brokenshire, James
Brooke, Annette
Bruce, Fiona
Bruce, rh Malcolm
Buckland, Mr Robert
Burns, Conor
Burns, rh Mr Simon
Burrowes, Mr David
Burstow, Paul
Burt, Lorely
Byles, Dan
Cairns, Alun
Campbell, rh Sir Menzies
Carmichael, rh Mr Alistair
Carmichael, Neil
Chishti, Rehman
Clark, rh Greg
Clarke, rh Mr Kenneth
Clifton-Brown, Geoffrey
Coffey, Dr Thérèse
Collins, Damian
Colvile, Oliver
Cox, Mr Geoffrey
Crabb, Stephen
Crockart, Mike
Crouch, Tracey
Davey, Mr Edward
Davies, David T. C. (Monmouth)
Davies, Glyn
de Bois, Nick
Dinenage, Caroline
Djanogly, Mr Jonathan
Doyle-Price, Jackie
Duddridge, James
Duncan, rh Mr Alan
Duncan Smith, rh Mr Iain
Ellis, Michael
Ellison, Jane
Ellwood, Mr Tobias
Elphicke, Charlie
Evans, Graham
Evans, Jonathan
Evennett, Mr David
Fabricant, Michael
Fallon, Michael
Featherstone, Lynne
Field, Mr Mark
Foster, rh Mr Don
Fox, rh Dr Liam
Francois, rh Mr Mark
Freer, Mike
Fullbrook, Lorraine
Gale, Mr Roger
Garnier, Mr Edward
Garnier, Mark
Gauke, Mr David
George, Andrew
Gibb, Mr Nick
Glen, John
Goodwill, Mr Robert
Gove, rh Michael
Graham, Richard
Grant, Mrs Helen
Grayling, rh Chris
Green, Damian
Greening, Justine
Gummer, Ben
Gyimah, Mr Sam
Hames, Duncan
Hammond, rh Mr Philip
Hammond, Stephen
Hancock, Matthew
Hancock, Mr Mike
Hands, Greg
Harper, Mr Mark
Harrington, Richard
Harris, Rebecca
Hart, Simon
Haselhurst, rh Sir Alan
Heald, Oliver
Heath, Mr David
Heaton-Harris, Chris
Hemming, John
Hendry, Charles
Hinds, Damian
Hoban, Mr Mark
Hollingbery, George
Holloway, Mr Adam
Hopkins, Kris
Howarth, Mr Gerald
Howell, John
Hughes, rh Simon
Huhne, rh Chris
Hunt, rh Mr Jeremy
Huppert, Dr Julian
Hurd, Mr Nick
Jackson, Mr Stewart
James, Margot
Javid, Sajid
Jenkin, Mr Bernard
Johnson, Gareth
Johnson, Joseph
Jones, Andrew
Jones, Mr David
Jones, Mr Marcus
Kawczynski, Daniel
Kennedy, rh Mr Charles
Kirby, Simon
Laing, Mrs Eleanor
Lamb, Norman
Lancaster, Mark
Latham, Pauline
Laws, rh Mr David
Leadsom, Andrea
Lee, Dr Phillip
Leech, Mr John
Lefroy, Jeremy
Leslie, Charlotte
Letwin, rh Mr Oliver
Lewis, Brandon
Liddell-Grainger, Mr Ian
Lidington, rh Mr David
Lilley, rh Mr Peter
Lloyd, Stephen
Lord, Jonathan
Loughton, Tim
Luff, Peter
Lumley, Karen
Macleod, Mary
Maude, rh Mr Francis
May, rh Mrs Theresa
Maynard, Paul
McIntosh, Miss Anne
McLoughlin, rh Mr Patrick
McPartland, Stephen
Mensch, Louise
Menzies, Mark
Mercer, Patrick
Metcalfe, Stephen
Miller, Maria
Milton, Anne
Mitchell, rh Mr Andrew
Moore, rh Michael
Mordaunt, Penny
Morgan, Nicky
Morris, Anne Marie
Morris, David
Morris, James
Mosley, Stephen
Mowat, David
Mulholland, Greg
Mundell, rh David
Munt, Tessa
Murray, Sheryll
Murrison, Dr Andrew
Neill, Robert
Newmark, Mr Brooks
Nokes, Caroline
Norman, Jesse
O'Brien, Mr Stephen
Ollerenshaw, Eric
Paice, rh Mr James
Parish, Neil
Patel, Priti
Paterson, rh Mr Owen
Penning, Mike
Penrose, John
Phillips, Stephen
Pickles, rh Mr Eric
Pincher, Christopher
Poulter, Dr Daniel
Prisk, Mr Mark
Pugh, John
Raab, Mr Dominic
Randall, rh Mr John
Rees-Mogg, Jacob
Reid, Mr Alan
Robathan, rh Mr Andrew
Robertson, Hugh
Robertson, Mr Laurence
Rogerson, Dan
Rudd, Amber
Ruffley, Mr David
Russell, Bob
Rutley, David
Sanders, Mr Adrian
Sandys, Laura
Scott, Mr Lee
Selous, Andrew
Shapps, rh Grant
Sharma, Alok
Shelbrooke, Alec
Simmonds, Mark
Simpson, Mr Keith
Skidmore, Chris
Smith, Miss Chloe
Smith, Henry
Smith, Julian
Smith, Sir Robert
Soames, Nicholas
Soubry, Anna
Spencer, Mr Mark
Stephenson, Andrew
Stevenson, John
Stewart, Iain
Stewart, Rory
Streeter, Mr Gary
Stride, Mel
Stunell, Andrew
Sturdy, Julian
Swales, Ian
Swayne, Mr Desmond
Swinson, Jo
Swire, rh Mr Hugo
Syms, Mr Robert
Thurso, John
Timpson, Mr Edward
Tomlinson, Justin
Tredinnick, David
Truss, Elizabeth
Tyrie, Mr Andrew
Uppal, Paul
Vaizey, Mr Edward
Vara, Mr Shailesh
Villiers, rh Mrs Theresa
Walker, Mr Robin
Wallace, Mr Ben
Walter, Mr Robert
Ward, Mr David
Watkinson, Angela
Weatherley, Mike
Webb, Steve
Wharton, James
Wheeler, Heather
White, Chris
Willetts, rh Mr David
Williams, Mr Mark
Williams, Roger
Williams, Stephen
Williamson, Gavin
Willott, Jenny
Wilson, Mr Rob
Wright, Jeremy
Wright, Simon
Yeo, Mr Tim
Young, rh Sir George
Zahawi, Nadhim
There you go. If you see them in the street, be sure to shout the word 'traitor' at them, won't you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)