14th Anniversary Tributes at Kensington Palace (Request)

By request, we - as primarily a political blog while maintaining a role as one of the loyal Diana supporting places online - are happy to share more of our photographs of the tributes at Kensington Palace. It was beautiful to be asked.

Just to add some context, we were only there for a brief while and ongoing renovations at Kensington Palace meant that the front gates were not in their usual configuration or state of accessibility, making the scene more difficult to photograph.

Still, this is what we have. If Diana fans want to save these, you are more than welcome provided you leave our link credit intact. Click on these to get a fuller sized photograph.

Diana - a lesson to all who do politics, methinks

Hundreds of tributes and bunches of flowers for Diana at Kensington Palace this afternoon.

While she will always have a few miserable sods with no heart to serve as detractors and just before we alienate the entire world by retweeting messages of love from all around the world, dedicated to Diana, Princess of Wales...

...as a political blog (in the main), one question for everyone with politics as their guiding blogosphere and social media activity cause.

Fourteen years on, hundreds and hundreds of messages for a woman that is no longer with us.

What was it about Diana that resonated so strongly?

[Updated] Yesterday, we created a huge 'wall of love' in our sidebar by retweeting messages of love for Diana posted by hundreds of people from all over the world.

Tell me a political message, an issue, a politician or a political party that wouldn't want that much love and affection, fourteen years after the event..?

Something very special is happening in terms of Diana.

Quite honestly and frankly, we always knew it. Since 1997. There's something about Diana that people are clearly connected to, even now. Quite astonishing, when you think about it.

Her long forgotten critics are... long forgotten. Their attempts to stop the people loving Diana, a failure.

To her detractors of a political persuasion, you would be well advised trying to understand it rather than trying to look the other way.

AIDS, leprosy, the homeless, landmines... Diana took on all these issues with the blessing of the public and they STILL adore her.

So, for you and your political cause, the question is simple:

How did Diana achieve this?

Therein is the solution to your political quandary.

To those who have expressed their love and affection for Diana today, bravo... it's very beautiful and very touching.

Diana: Fourteen years on, still no justice

So, here we are then. Another 31st August.

It is fourteen years to the day since Diana, Princess of Wales was killed in Paris.

An inquest jury, subjected to dodgy evidence and kept in the dark about suppressed information, were still able to discern enough from what they were told that they ruled that she had been unlawfully killed. Still no criminal pursuit of those responsible.

Here is a simple truth. For all of the many, many posts made on this blog, our most popular post of all time is one related to Diana.

Several of our twenty most read posts of all time - Diana.

The people all over the world, they still love her. Still adore her.

That enduring love, fourteen years on, was earned.

For her humanitarian work, for that reassuring and candid demonstration of her human vulnerabilities which are found in us all, for her compassion, her campaigning, her beauty.

While being attacked by the establishment for her campaign to outlaw anti-personnel landmines, she showed the world that she was one of us.

Despite the most orchestrated campaigns against her and the most bizarre and frightening living arrangements possible, hounded by the establishment and the paparazzi - finding no peace or privacy - Diana would not be kept prisoner, Diana would not surrender.

She was a free spirit who would fight to the end. And beyond, some would believe.

And somehow, amongst it all, she managed to be a most loving mother who raised two wonderful boys - one of whom is the future King of England.

She was, in the words of her brother: "The unique, the complex, the extraordinary and irreplaceable Diana whose beauty - both internal and external - will never be extinguished from our minds."

All those who loved and love you, Diana... we pledge to continue to cherish and honour your memory and to campaign for justice on your behalf.

9am UPDATE:
We're incredibly moved by all the beautiful messages people are posting via Twitter. Hundreds of dedications to Diana from people, a lot of them very young, from all over the world. Very beautiful, very moving.

See also:
Huffington Post - August is The Cruellest Month - The Lasting Legacy of Princess Diana

When even the lefties ask questions about the legitimacy of the EU, it is time for German taxpayers to say 'enough'.

One of the things we try to do when we do not understand the politics of a situation is to say nothing, hold our thoughts, and then try to present a collated picture as more information comes to light.

This is what we've been doing over the last week or so as Germany is increasingly finding itself at the eye of the euro currency storm which could topple Angela Merkel from power.

So, let's try to get to grips with the economic and political sounds emanating from Berlin (Brussels East) over the last week or so.

First off, we had the head of Germany’s Commerzbank, Martin Blessing, calling for "a unified European economic policy organized by a finance minister to stabilize the single currency".

As we have all discussed on many occasions, such an arrangement would mean the end to the nation state entirely as management of a nation's finances and the allocation of resources to specific projects is the sole function of a Government and our relationship with it.

It - government - exists for no other purpose. It cannot give you anything that was not your own in the first place and it cannot do for the people anything that the people cannot do for themselves.

'Government' is a legal fiction with no resources of it's own - it merely manages the people's equity.

Should an external body replace the management of finances and the control of employees (state workers), then the people we have entrusted to look after our equity and investment (created with a birth registration and certificate) are being replaced with an impostor.

As the sole beneficiary of your own legal fiction, it is up to you to fire the person in the executive position (government) if they do not perform to the standards that you demand of them, according to your investment in the common wealth.

Certainly, the people of Germany are increasingly looking at the head of their government and questioning whether Angela Merkel is acting in the interests of German common wealth. The beleaguered German taxpayer, now the laughing stock of the world for their continual payment of everybody else's debts, look likely to fire their executive - a prospect that has German politicians finally making a stand.

German President Christian Wulff has already spoken out publicly, questioning the legality of the bailouts and debt buying. With particular criticism of the European Cental Bank, Wulff says: "I regard the huge buy-up of bonds of individual states by the ECB as legally and politically questionable. Article 123 of the Treaty on the EU’s workings prohibits the ECB from directly purchasing debt instruments, in order to safeguard the central bank’s independence."

Wolfgang Bossbach, the internal affairs spokesman of Angela Merkel's own Christian Democrat party (CDU) has stated that he will vote against plans hatched up by Merkel and France's Sarkozy which will allow the ECB to buy up bond packages and recapitalise banks.

"I can't vote against my own conviction," warns Bossbach while the CSU has issued a briefing warning that the pooling of resources to manage debts has implications for sovereignty and lacks democratic legitimacy.

Gerhard Schick of the German Greens told EurActiv: "I fear that the number of CDU and FDP parliamentarians who are rightly upset about their limited participation in bailout decisions is rising."

Attacks on the democratic illegitimacy of decisions being made by the EU and ECB elite are growing across the European continent.

Even the leftists - to whom the European Union is the stuff of wet dreams - are now speaking out.

Many of us might have been stunned to think that, one day, even The Guardian might start asking questions - but they sure have now.

They quote Antonio Di Pietro, 'a leading liberal MP', who says: "Italy is under the tutelage of the EU, and a country under tutelage is not a free and democratic one."

In the same report, a leader of one of Europe's largest public sector trade unions warns: "Europe cannot be governed through secret letters of bankers, officials or an unaccountable body."

For the record, the European Union is an illegitimate legal fiction. It has no constitution... but even though the people said they couldn't have one, the EU elites carried on anyway.

Meanwhile, back in Britain, the governing Conservative Party - led by Call Me Dave and his LibDem, EU Quisling placeman sidekick Nick Clegg - still puts up the pretence of being 'eurosceptic'.

The problem is, they've played this game too long - and are now being increasingly attacked for what people see as a 'sham' opposition to the illegitimate and undemocratic EU.

That the future of democracy might be in the hands of German parliamentarians and the German courts says all that you need to know about the do-nothing, EU-complicit Conservative Party here at home.

The EU issue should destroy the Conservative Party in the same way that it looks to have the potential to topple Angela Merkel.

Our involvement with the European Union does, after all, lay at the hands of former Conservative Party Prime Minister Edward Heath.

Quote of the Day: 29th August 2011

"UAF has issued what must rank as one of the silliest political statements of the year so far. “We the undersigned welcome the banning of the racist English Defence League’s march through Tower Hamlets,” it says. “But we are appalled to discover that the Metropolitan Police are applying for a blanket ban on ALL marches across five London boroughs… It is our human right to peacefully march in Tower Hamlets.” Wait – how come UAF has a “human right” to march, but the EDL does not? Are EDL members not human? Moreover, it really is spectacularly daft to talk about the importance of the right to march in the same breath as you welcome a government decision to ban a march."

- Spiked editor Brendan O'Neill in the Daily Telegraph

Britain shamed as 'Free Norman Scarth' campaign goes global

RT, again, doing the job that the BBC should be doing, were the BBC not part of the subversive problem.

British freedom... being fought for by the Russians.

See also:
Captain Ranty who has been covering this story in some depth.

Did an alleged CIA-front tell totalitarian Theresa May to shove her bid to curb free speech online?

With previous Home Secretary 'Jackboot' Jacqui Smith of the much feared authoritarian Labour Party back in the news headlines for all the wrong reasons, her Conservative counterpart in the one-party state that is Britain is trying to not be outdone.

Theresa May - hereafter to be known as 'Totalitarian Theresa' - has held a meeting with bigwigs from Facebook, Twitter and Blackberry. The meeting was in response to the recent riots and looting in London and across England with claims made that social media had been used to organise the scumbags responsible.

Amidst speculation that the police had been looking at ways of switching off social media during the disturbances and finding that they could not do so lawfully, it is believed that the meeting between the three big social media providers and Totalitarian Theresa was aimed at finding a co-operative get around.

Yet amidst official denials, it is suggested that our control-freak Home Secretary (who obviously sees Jackboot Jacqui as an authoritarian blueprint) was told to shove it.

Yes, it would appear that Facebook, Twitter and Blackberry think our freedom of speech is more important to them than it is to Theresa May and British establishment figures.

The hilarious thing about this - if true - is that Facebook has long been at the centre of speculation and conspiracy claims. There are many who believe that the service is a front for the CIA and one of it's intelligence programs.

So we have an alleged CIA-front operation defending us in Britain and defending our free speech from our own Government.

There is more to this story than meets the eye, we are sure.

The humiliation for Totalitarian Theresa and her Yellow Tory government follows three days after news of yet more attempts to shut down free speech online for British people - with news that Parliament is launching an inquiry into the feasibility of web filtering, under the pretext of protecting kids from pornography.

Clearly - as with the smoking ban shutting down the Great British Pub - the powers that be do not want us talking to each other.

Not to be totally humiliated, Totalitarian Theresa has today taken her anger out on the English Defence League, (unlawfully) banning freedom of association and freedom of speech in several London boroughs throughout the month of September.

Newspapers are full of reports claiming that only English Defence League marches are banned, but online wisdom is suggesting that ALL marches by ANYBODY have also been banned.

Quite how they intend preventing people from walking down the street remains to be seen.

Whatever you think of the English Defence League, Her Majesty The Queen took a coronation oath at Westminster Abbey to uphold the laws, liberties and traditions of English people...

...so we would advise the English Defence League to have a whip round and take Theresa May to the Queen's courts under English common law as, clearly, a ban on walking down the street is unlawful itself.

Naturally, the compliant mainstream media is asking no questions. Most of them have very one sided stories on this. Most carry quotes from opponents to the English Defence League but no counter-points from the EDL themselves.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

To paraphrase Orwell: The voters outside looked from Labour to Tory, and from Tory to LibDem, and from LibDem to Labour again: but already it was impossible to say which was which.

Thought for the Day: 23rd August 2011

In order to awake fully, do not say 'it is'.

As yourself: "Why?" or "What does it mean?".

Are Kellogg's Frosties more lawful than an Act of Parliament?

This is essentially a follow-up post to yesterday's much read intrigue - and thank you for your support on that one.

Part of what we did afterwards, as you'll see from the updates, was to look at coats of arms and emblems.

And then we noticed something. Have a look at this.

This is the coat of arms of Her Majesty The Queen, the human, of the House of Windsor:

H/T: Wikipedia

Now, observe very closely.

This is what can be found on products which are given the official Royal seal of approval - for the purposes of this demonstration, we photographed the side of a box of Kellogg's Frosties:

Okay, so Her Majesty The Queen approves wholeheartedly of Kellogg's Frosties. We know this because of the royal patent that she is allowing the breakfast cereal producer to use on the side of their packaging. And Kellogg's do make lovely cereals. No controversy so far.

Now, watch this very carefully. Here is the front of an Act of Parliament:

We borrowed that from the website of a fine educational establishment, but what we're interested in is what is happening with the supposedly royal mark on that Act of Parliament. We've all seen Her Majesty The Queen, the woman from the House of Windsor at the State Opening of Parliament, reading out her "My government will..." speech.

So, what is going on with the Her Majesty's coat of arms on the front of an Act of Parliament? Look very closely. There SHOULD be another lion sat atop the crown in the centre... but there is not. There should also be plumes, marked with fleur-de-lys. These are also absent.

It is not our deliberate selection of a dodgy image. Look here at the official government legislation website. The 'royal' mark is in the banner at the top, but look... it is not complete. That lion atop the crown and the fleur-de-lys marked plumes are absent.

So, there are a number of possible things going on here.

One thing worth pointing out is that the 'royal' mark on an Act of Parliament cannot possibly be simply printed that way because of difficulties in replicating - Kellogg's manage to replicate their royal mark of approval with no issues.

So, why do Acts of Parliament have something that looks very, very similar to Her Majesty The Queen's coat of arms on the front of them but which, actually, differs? Can we be presumptive enough to assert that what is carried on an Act of Parliament is NOT, in fact, the coat of arms of Her Majesty The Queen of the House of Windsor?

And what, then, of the value of Acts of Parliament if they cannot carry the full weight of the seal of approval of Her Majesty The Queen; a seal of approval proudly displayed by breakfast cereal manufacturer Kellogg's on the side of a box of Frosties?

Are we to take from this a sign that a box of Kellogg's Frosties have more lawful standing than an Act of Parliament?

We should be told the reason why...

...this discovery has the potential to be g-r-r-r-r-eat!

The Crown vs. THE CROWN

We know we have a few readers who are interested in lawful rebellion, freemen on the land, and fellow English constitution supporters who pop by this blog.

So, for you, mind the occasional F-word, but get this:

Don't skip this. It's an hour out of your life. But listen. Download.

So, question... did Her Majesty The Queen, the human being from the House of Windsor, give her signature to the Lisbon Treaty and thereby breach her coronation oath... or was the Lisbon Treaty endorsed by THE CROWN, the corporation?

...with a H/T to our Twitter friend gruffdiver

UPDATE: Assuming that you've actually listened to the clip above (shame on you if you haven't), then look at this photograph. Is that Her Majesty The Queen's coat of arms above the door of that court? Nope... it seems to be this.

And whose courts are these? Look carefully at the gate.

While this is most definitely nothing to do with Queen Elizabeth II of the House of Windsor, either. It is, however, the coat of arms of the Law Society...

WEB REACTIONS: A few thoughts on this from IPJ's excellent blog and from Victor Meldrew's Brother blog.

Libyan Rebels Overthrow the BBC

Whatever one thinks of the situation in Libya - and time will tell on that one - there are more scalps claimed by the Libya 'rebels' tonight than that of Gaddafi.

Twitter was awash all late evening with political and current affairs commentators - both high profile and from the obscure and alternative media - giving almost universal praise to Sky News for its coverage from Tripoli.

To a man, all of them were in awe of the journalism of Sky's Alex Crawford in particular.

And, to a man, social media was awash with people ridiculing the BBC for non-existent to lame coverage of the events.

Consensus appeared to be that the BBC used to be the place that people tuned to at times of national and global crisis - no more.

A failing organisation over-run with political bias, the one saving grace for the BBC used to be its ability to be in danger zones, bringing incredible life changing news to the world, first.

Having failed so spectacularly with Libya - trounced on an epic scale by Sky News - the BBC, at best a foul propaganda organisation for various vested interests, will now face a massive clamour to lose it's privileged position as a taxpayer funded broadcaster.

People were using social media to demand refunds last night - while even high profile BBC news and politics figures admitted that they were watching the coverage from Libya... on Sky News.

Goodbye BBC - you were once a relevance. Now you are just a squalid leftist mouthpiece, pumping out brainwashing propaganda on behalf of your EU paymasters and the climate globalist industry.

Watch this clamour grow, BBC. The Libyan rebels have, inadvertently, brought you down, too.

UPDATE:
We were saving comment until later regarding what is actually happening on the ground (regular readers will know that this blog has constantly opposed intervention in Libya) but, responding to one of our commenters, we post the following and ask... is everything as it seems?

Quote of the Day: 70 Useful Idiots Edition

"...this rebellion isn't quite as fierce as it may seem. One Tory backbencher tells me the Tory whips have actually encouraged this group to call for renegotiation of the UK terms of EU membership. The whips are doing this, I'm told, to stave off a greater threat: support for an in-or-out referendum. The latter is gathering momentum, and threatens to tear the coalition apart."

- Fraser Nelson casts light on the laughable "70 Tory eurosceptics" in The Spectator.

...funny how we were able to smell the bullshit from a mile off, huh?

As we said this morning - you can't trust the Tories on Europe.

Sunday Paper Review: 21st August 2011

So, after all of the headlines of recent days, weeks and months, there's absolutely nothing that the Sunday papers could serve up that would come as a surprise to anyone, right? Pick a level of society - from the top down - and it's all about corruption, sleaze and criminality marked, rather fittingly at the end of the week with an anti-corruption police officer being arrested by his own anti-corruption squad allegedly on suspicion of passing 'Hackgate' information to The Guardian.

All that we mere mortals can do now is to point, laugh and call all of the elites names. Doesn't solve anything, but is quite therapeutic for the soul.

Cue the Prince of Darkness, the Lord Voldemort that is Peter Mandelson. The Mail on Sunday attempts to get to the bottom of how on earth he can afford to make "an offer to buy an £8 million house in one of London’s most exclusive districts."

The report serves to remind us that Mandelson has links with the occasional Rothschild and the odd Russian billionaire oligarch or two... but we're still no wiser on where all of his money has come from.

Enjoy your fish, chips and guacamole, Hartlepool!

The Ghost of Christmas Past pops up in - where else? - The Observer to wag an icy finger of apparent analysis of the recent riots and looting. We talk, of course, of Tony Blair who remains - in fairness to him - the last Prime Minister to win a mandate via a majority... and we've had two other PMs since then.

He starts by saying: "Both David Cameron and Ed Miliband made excellent speeches last week and there was much to agree with in what they said."

From then on, it's a very long list of words which seem to add up to pleading: 'Nowt to do with me, guv!'.

It's gonna make headlines - but it is seriously dull.

The Ghost of Christmas Present, David Cameron, is given star billing in the Sunday Express. The newspaper tries very hard to 'big up' the Conservative Party leader. "David Cameron Vows to Fight Hated EU Law," the newspaper screams.

However, when we read what he's penned, this is not the stuff of "we'll fight them on the beaches" or "never surrender". Oh no.

Instead, we get from Cameron: "We are going to fight in Europe for changes to the way the European Court works."

Churchill's place in the history books for some of his great speaches not threatened there then, Cam.

But get the sheer nerve of Cast Iron Dave anyway. He says: "The British people have fought and died for people’s rights to freedom and dignity but they did not fight so that people did not have to take full responsibility for their actions."

They didn't fight and die to be powerless in their own country, Dave. I think our WW2 heroes would criticise you and your cast iron, surrender monkey guarantees, for one. Stick that in the political elite's navel gazing.

Buried away in the business section of the Independent on Sunday is a visit from the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come with big city names threatening to quit Britain should the EU bring in Merkel and Sarkozy's transaction tax.

The newspaper quotes Michael Spicer of Icap who says: "This tax would destroy the City and cost the Exchequer billions, but it would benefit Brussels. Companies like Icap will simply move elsewhere outside the EU if Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel push ahead with this silly tax."

This one is going to have little Georgie Osborne squirming, huh? Dancing to the tune of his Rothschild and Bilderberg masters on one hand while, at home... oh... hang on. Goodbye to the city it is.

The Sunday Telegraph wants to impress upon us the idea that the Conservative Party really is 'eurosceptic'. Stop giggling at the back. They write: "Up to 70 Conservative MPs are to join a new group dedicated to "reversing the process" of closer European Union integration".

Does anybody care or even believe a single thing that the Conservative Party says or does about the EU? More talk. Always talk. Never action. Waffle, waffle, waffle - in we go, further and further into the EU black hole, yadda, yadda, yadda, billions and billions more funneled into the EU's financial vortex.

The Conservatives can talk all they like but actions show that you can't trust the Tories on Europe.

And finally... The People reports on the case of an 'asylum seeker' who, the newspaper says, has received hair loss treatment - courtesy of the British taxpayer.

Must. Stop. Headbutting. Desk...

...do you think I could get the Government to deliver all of my groceries from Harrods at taxpayer expense? My reason? I keep reading about politicians and banksters and I feel socially excluded unless I'm experiencing a similar lifestyle.

For starters, we'll have the Royal Beluga Caviar, wash that down with a little Krug... and I just need to be able to pretend that I'm an asylum seeker with a genuine case to get it all courtesy of the taxpayer, do I?

Or I have to get elected?

How much do 20,000 stolen postal votes cost, again?

Quote of the Day: 19th August 2011

"Pay Your Carbon Taxes To Al Gore Or Space Aliens Will Attack: Having failed with drowning polar bears, global superstorms, rising sea levels and a myriad of other manufactured hoaxes, global warming alarmists have invented a new threat to try and persuade us to pay carbon taxes directly to Al Gore and the global elite – vengeful environmentalist extraterrestrials from outer space."

- Paul Joseph Watson for PrisonPlanet.com

...and he's not making it up, either. They really are completely deranged lunatics. Here's the same story in both the Daily Mail and The Guardian.

ManBearPig from Outer Space, anyone?

(Worst) Quote of the Day: 18th August 2011

"It's a simple choice between good and evil. I don't think it has been so clear since the great struggle between Churchill and Hitler. Those who don't vote for me will be weighed in the balance come Judgment Day. The Archangel Gabriel will say, 'You didn't vote for Ken Livingstone in 2012. Oh dear, burn for ever. Your skin flayed for all eternity.'"

- Ken Livingstone proves himself to be unfit for public office.

Oh dear. Never mind, Ken. We'll send nurse along to look after you in a minute...

Diana: Engaged or not, "they're planning an 'accident' in my car"

Today's Daily Express contained revelations from Trixi Chall, a German journalist who wrote for the very popular Bild newspaper.

Chall claims that she witnessed Diana and Dodi in Monte Carlo, looking in the window of the Repossi jewellers shop, a week before she was killed in a Parisian underpass.

She says: "They went to the shop on the left of the Hermitage hotel. They looked in the window and Diana was pointing with her finger at something. I saw them entering the shop."

This new account corroborates long standing claims of Mohamed Al Fayed who has always insisted that his son Dodi and Diana were planning to announce their engagement.

It does seem rather strange that Chall should come forward now, after fourteen years, considering the nature of what she witnessed. However, the newspaper reports: "Ms Chall said she has never given her account to the various investigations because she felt strongly from very early on there was a huge “cover-up of the truth coming from the top”."

Our friend - Australian author John Morgan, who has written a series of heavyweight research books into the Diana conspiracy - tells the newspaper that the new witness testimony adds credibility to the account of other witnesses and notes that: "...the staff inside the Monte Carlo Repossi store on August 23 1997 were not heard from during Scott Baker’s “thorough” inquest and have never been interviewed by police."

We are, however, more interested in the landmines narrative and investigating how she may have been unlawfully killed in a planned 'accident' in her car - just as she told everyone would happen.

In an interesting piece to be thrown into light this week, the team behind the documentary film Unlawful Killing have highlighted a story in The Observer the weekend before last.

It centered on the death of Nobel prize winning author Albert Camus in 1960 amidst claims that the KGB may have caused him to die in a staged accident.

The paragraph in the Camus report revelant to our large number of Diana researcher readers and devotees is this one:

"I heard something very strange from the mouth of a man who knew lots of things and had very informed sources. According to him, the accident that had cost Albert Camus his life in 1960 was organised by Soviet spies. They damaged a tyre on the car using a sophisticated piece of equipment that cut or made a hole in the wheel at speed."

So, this was 1960 - thirty-seven years before Diana met her death.

This would seem to establish a track record of staged car 'accidents' when coupled with the account by Sir Peter Horsley - a man with a distinguished air force career who also served as "first as equerry to Princess Elizabeth and the Duke of Edinburgh, then, after George VI's death, as equerry to the new Queen and finally, to Prince Philip."

In his autobiography Sounds From Another Room, published - bizarrely - in the week after Diana's death in 1997, Horsley recounted his first hand knowledge of what he believed what an 'accident' that directly effected him in 1986; eleven years before Diana's death.

The Daily Telegraph told how he recounted that:

"In 1986 he was driving to a meeting at Plymouth, Devon, when on a straight dual carriageway his BMW swung, hit the central reservation, crossed into the opposite carriageway and collided with an approaching car whose occupant was killed.

As he began to recover from serious injuries, Horsley sought to discover how the accident occurred. His inquiries suggested to him that the SAS or some other secret agency was keen to hush up the affair, particularly concerning the Army major who had died in the other car.

Horsley later became convinced that his car had been followed by a Volvo from which it had been controlled by radio and made to crash. He thought it possible that the accident had been contrived by assassins hired to avenge the death of four sons of a Gulf sheikh, who had died at the hands of British troops in a South Yemen ambush.

Horsley came to believe that assassins might have entered the BMW after the accident and removed the radio equipment they had installed. Certainly, when the police examined the car, they found nothing amiss."

Certainly, we know that the manufacturers of the car in which Diana was travelling - Mercedes - offered their assistance and technical expertise to the authorities investigating the 'crash' in which Diana and Dodi were killed.

Their offer of assistance was declined - something that was not explored at the inquest into Diana's death.

The inquest jury ruled that Diana and Dodi were unlawfully killed by their driver and unidentified persons in and on pursuing vehicles.

No murder or manslaughter hunt has been launched, despite the inquest jury's verdict.

We were right: 'Eurosceptics' shout 'we told you so' as Merkel and Sarkozy show their hand

Remember the date - 16th August 2011. It is a date that the history books of Britain may mark with sombre regret. If there is to be a future Britain.

Despite having absolutely no democratic mandate from the people of Europe anywhere, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy emerged from a meeting yesterday to publicly confess to the endgame of driving us along the road to a country called Europe, whether we like it or not.

If you thought a democratic deficit at Westminster and bizarre directives from Brussels were bad enough, think again - you ain't seen nothing yet.

This 'new' development is announced against the pretext of needing to find a solution for the current economic crisis engulfing the Eurozone. However, experts are already observing that this announcement has little to do with markets or the current economic misery.

Here's how AP report it: "Sarkozy called for a "new economic government" for Europe that would meet at least twice a year with European Union President Herman Van Rompuy as its head".

Even the BBC is open about what is going on with their report noting that: "Ms Merkel said that further integration would be a "step-by-step" process. They also advocated a tax on financial transactions to raise more revenues."

As if the cost of the EU wasn't crippling us all enough...

For now, the 'step-by-step' dismantling of national sovereignty will continue to be hidden by a smokescreen pretence at national governments. The Daily Mail tells us how: "...each euro zone country’s domestic parliament would still have a say about ‘government’ decisions, on a ‘step by step’ basis. It was not immediately clear whether the proposed new government would require a new treaty, although the German leader admitted: ‘I can’t say that the Lisbon Treaty will be the last one we sign.’"

Knowing that our Westminster politicians are mostly nothing more than a bunch of self-serving traitors, our last hope of freedom in Europe probably lies - ironically - with the German Bundestag and courts.

There, the illegal EU bailouts are being challenged in the constitutional court while the Daily Telegraph reports how: "German Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition partners are threatening a withdrawal from government if she agrees to eurobonds or any form of fiscal union to prop up southern Europe."

While doing nothing to placate or remotely impress the financial markets, Open Europe notes that: "...the conclusions from the meeting do carry political significance, as they essentially reinforced German and French desires to press ahead with more centralised control over eurozone countries' economic policies (on Franco-German terms, if those can be agreed)."

UKIP's Nigel Farage tells the Daily Express today: "This is simply a monstrous constitutional power grab that will do nothing to solve the real economic crisis. Bit by bit, eurozone members are losing their sovereignty as the European superstate is created. Nothing in these proposals will calm the markets. I am also prepared to bet that the European political elite will not ask the permission of their peoples via a referendum to make this happen."

Opposition to the Eurozone in this country is not limited to UKIP. A YouGov poll yesterday found that: "In the U.K., 85 percent said they disapprove of [the idea of our] joining the euro." - a stunningly high figure which you can guarantee our traitors in Westminster will ignore at the first opportunity they get, finding - as they always do - some flimsy pretext or engineered situation to make the end-game a reality.

We told you so. Once they have full economic governance, it's game over.

As Simon Heffer points out in a seperate Daily Mail piece today: "...be in no doubt what fiscal union means: it is one economic policy, one taxation system, one social security system, one debt, one economy, one finance minister. And all of the above would be German. Where Hitler failed by military means to conquer Europe, modern Germans are succeeding through trade and financial discipline. Welcome to the Fourth Reich."

Meanwhile, in Spain, they are talking about an exit strategy. Well, the people are, anyway. Though as we know, politicians no longer even pretend to represent the demands of the people:

Quote of the Day: 16th August 2011

"In truth, it is Britain’s own denigration of white working-class culture and lifestyles, the political and media classes’ ceaseless war of words against the way the white working classes live, love, speak and act, which communicates to white youngsters the message: “Your culture is shit. Find another one.”

Meanwhile working-class institutions are either in a state of disarray (trade unions being the best example) or have been invaded by the intolerant nannies and nudgers of the prole-loathing elite: consider the public house, once a relatively free zone, now colonised by morality cops on the lookout for smoking, excessive boozing and anything with a whiff of rowdiness. Football games, post-work pints, EastEnd attitude, northern grit – hardly any aspect of white working-class culture has escaped being problematised by the snobs, therapists and health obsessives who govern modern Britain."

- Brendan O'Neill, editor of Spiked, finds a nail and whacks it squarely on the head with a jumbo sized mallet in the Daily Telegraph.

All political protest to now be banned in attention-diverted, police state Britain?

...best analysis that we've heard. Agree with almost everything. Here's another not unrelated view:

Elsewhere, one of our Twitter friends tipped us off about a story in the Telegraph. Turns out that the community spirited people who organised themselves to clean up after feral vermin looted and torched our cities were told that they were... capitalist scum.

...by Donnacha DeLong, the new president of the National Union of Journalists.

The NUJ were signatories to that Guardian article we keep pointing people to.

Find out more about community spirited people being the new capitalist 'scum' by clicking here.

Quote of the Day: 14th August 2011

"To pillory a man for pointing out such a glaringly obvious cultural fact just because he’s white and right-wing would have been quite wrong even before the riots. Post riots it is positively obscene.

Not just obscene, in fact, but dangerous. Of course, we expect the BBC not to get it. Like the Guardian – and the Labour party – the BBC created the culture that led to these riots, so it’s hardly surprising if it carries on playing the old PC game like the 80s and 90s never went away."

- James Delingpole in the Telegraph making a great deal of sense in defence of David Starkey and of the wickedly dangerous game that 'Leftists' are playing in a bid to silence all debate. As usual.

...but then the BBC and The Guardian are the very same racists (against white, working class Englishmen) that they accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being.

Perhaps they need reminding of this, from the Leftist icon that is Tony Blair...

Sunday Paper Review: 14th August 2011

So, Sunday Paper Review. We'll try and get through this without too much mention of rioting, looting or David Starkey. How's that..?

I think, though, that I may be at risk of needing hospital treatment for I sense I may be about to enter into a state of shock induced spasm so severe that my coronary system may well be unable to cope.

The catalyst for such systemic physical angst is an article in The Observer, often the cause of much rage and annoyance, but today...

...a piece by Nick Cohen in which, in far more eloquent terms than any 'eurosceptic' or 'eurorealist' blog could ever have dreamed of, he concedes the battle of logic over the EU's single currency to those of us on this side of the debate.

"Not since the collapse of communism has an argument been settled so decisively," he volunteers.

He writes: "Most satisfying of all for eurosceptics has been the destruction of the smug and unwarranted notion that the triumph of the euro was inevitable, and those who criticised it were not honest opponents but cranks, reactionaries or worse."

We'll accept our "pyrrhic victory" in good grace and simply thank Cohen and The Observer for finally letting us glimpse a distant white flag over the matter.

And in a gesture of respect for this amazing turnaround, we will not use the word 'Guardianistas' for at least 24-hours. Promise.

Now, if only we could get Cam the Sham to get us out of the EU entirely, our job in the blogosphere would be done.

Fat chance.

A story that had slipped out of the headlines and had been almost forgotten is brought back up to date by the Mail on Sunday.

A year after MI6 officer Gareth Williams was found dead in mysterious circumstances in his Pimlico flat, new information has come to light to suggest that: "a Kremlin car was identified near the officer’s Pimlico flat" on the last day he was seen alive.

The report notes that it has: "...been claimed that Mr Williams, who was on secondment to MI6 from the Government’s eavesdropping centre GCHQ, was working on equipment that tracked the flow of money from Russia to Europe."

There are dark forces... but are they Russian?

The ambassador for the Libyan rebels will have the 'leftist' blood boiling in fury.

The Independent on Sunday carries a report into the views of Mahmud Nacua who says those Libyan people he represents believe David Cameron is a "courageous" man while Libyans are "not satisfied" with Tony Blair because of his apparent closeness to Gadaffi. The Scottish Government also comes in for criticism.

The Sunday Telegraph has an interesting media report centered on the case of a woman carrying on with her late husband's legal action aimed at forcing the BBC to publish a report into "its coverage of the Middle East conflict, which he believed would reveal bias against Israel."

A biased BBC? No!? Get away! Whoever would have thought it?

We must confess to taking a great amount of satisfaction in knowing that they are at the centre of a Supreme Court case over the matter.

Meanwhile, the Sunday Mirror highlights the scandal of the "£863m paid out in compensation for NHS blunders last year" with another "£2.4billion to settle future claims" put aside.

About one month's worth of membership fees for the European Union misery club, in other words.

And finally... the last word on the criminal vermin who went on their rioting and looting spree must, for now at least, go to the World War II veterans quoted in The People who ask: "Is This Really What We Fought In Two World Wars For?".

Quite.

There can be no great 'conversation' about the riots and looting until the warped 'Leftists' can grow up and listen

After the carnage that we have all witnessed on our streets, the one hope for me was that the nation could rise like a phoenix, repair itself in the very flames that burned our cities and rise again - a stronger, wiser and more mature nation.

If the last twenty-four hours have taught anybody anything, it is that nothing is about to change in this country, sadly.

For an indicator of that, one need only look to the huge uproar and debate about David Starkey's appearance on the subversive BBC's Newsnight programme.

For those of us who have declared the biased BBC's agenda obvious and thus have switched over, we had to learn about his comments via YouTube and social media.

Quite clearly, his words would have been uncomfortably close-to-the-bone for some and, we'll accept, that he might not know all of the vocabulary that the 'leftist' politically correct thought police demand that we all use.

However, was there any truth and wisdom in what he was trying to say?

'Leftists' will never know, as they were all too ready and all too fast to jump up onto a soapbox and hurl personal abuse at the man.

This is the hallmark of the 'leftist' - abuse, readily thrown at anybody who dares to disagree with them.

Of course, we use the word 'leftist' in that form deliberately - the terms left and right, originating from the era of the French Revolution, have lost their meaning.

The modern 'leftist' thinks it okay to fake evidence for illegal wars, murdering near a million people and claiming to be the best friend of those people afterwards (once they've been complicit in illegally torturing them) - while all the time, shouting at and hurling abuse at anyone who dares raise a question mark over it all.

The modern 'leftist' has no interest whatsoever in debate - they are so certain of their belief in their warped worldview that they are right and anyone who disagrees is evil - an utter and absolute inability to concede that there may be more opinions in the world than just their own.

You would hope that, after the unprecedented scenes of rioting, looting, arson and murder witnessed last week which terrorised the nation, we might all sit down like grown ups and have a mature conversation with each other in which we discuss differing viewpoints and work out how we rebuild a society that is obviously now quite sick.

However, the conversation is already being dominated by 'leftists' and their primary mouthpieces in the mainstream media.

As ever, instead of sitting down maturely and listening, the modern 'leftist' is already totally geared up to do nothing other than hurl personal abuse.

You want a national conversation with that? It is not going to happen.

For one thing is clear - the modern 'leftist' hasn't yet worked out that a conversation involves both speaking and listening.

To the modern 'leftist', conversation is abhorrent and speaking must only ever be conducted on the stage of loud personal abuse.

...but, oh dear. Seems I've done a Starkey. All through this article, I've used the word 'leftist'.

Naturally, what I really meant was 'the Labour Party and it's supporters'.

I stand corrected and chastised.

Save the Wandsworth One! (For Now)

Those who read our blog during the riots will know what our position was on the verminous scum that ran amok on our streets, terrorising our communities - they are feral vermin and a cancer on our society.

However, this country has a system of fair play in the way that we conduct our justice.

It is all very well for the 'Hang him!' mob to demand knee-jerk vengeance on the looters, but we still have to allow the law to be conducted fairly.

That does not appear to be the case in respect of the first to be handed an eviction notice for their alleged involvement in the looting and carnage.

One must be very careful not to interfere with court proceedings, so here are the facts as outlined by the Daily Mail:

"[Daniel] Sartain-Clarke was arrested after more than 100 looters went on the rampage on Monday night. For two hours, the mob ransacked mobile phone stores and sports shops such as Foot Locker and JD Sports.

He appeared before magistrates in Battersea on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to burglary and violent disorder. He and two co-defendants were remanded in custody."

So, at this moment in time, Sartain-Clarke is merely a suspect. He has not been convicted of anything.

So what business have Wandsworth Council got in handing out eviction notices?

Have Wandsworth Council not heard that, in this country, we operate Habeas Corpus? Innocent until proven guilty?

The Daily Mail quotes Ravi Govindia, the leader of Wandsworth Council as saying: "This council will do its utmost to ensure that those who are responsible pay a proper price. Ultimately this could lead to eviction from their homes."

We have no problem with that - AFTER the accused have been convicted.

Until then, they are suspects and suspects are innocent until they are proven guilty.

Upon conviction? The rioters and looters deserve all that they get.

However, at this moment in time, we would suggest that the mother of the accused has a very strong case for taking court action of her own.

We do, after all, have Habeas Corpus and justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done - fairly.

Something for the Weekend: Britain on the Brink

This half-hour film is being re-circulated today. It is a couple of years old, but the points remain the same... the EU is the death of Britain and the end of your rights and liberties.

Quote of the Day: 12th August 2011

"The core of the problem is that the EU is becoming increasingly divorced from the European street. Since its inception, the project of European integration has primarily been an elite effort. Publics have been either disengaged or passively supportive.

But no longer; the EU has been politicized. In beer gardens in Munich, cafés in Paris, and tavernas in Athens the electorate is finally animated by the project of European integration. The EU, however, is the object of scorn, not affection. The rejection of the Constitutional Treaty, enlargement, immigration and the desirability of open borders, the financial downturn and the costs and benefits of a shared economic destiny – these developments have provoked considerable public ire. The EU is no longer a distant and elitist – even if benign – undertaking; many Europeans now see the union as undermining their ability to control their destiny."

- Charles A. Kupchan of the Council on Foreign Relations

H/T: England Expects

It is time the political class had the courage to discuss the racially motivated hounding of the white, English working class

In a timely piece of breaking news to accompany this post, it has just been announced that Home Secretary Theresa May has given permission for EDL marches to be banned in Telford this weekend.

The EDL has not won much support from this blog as much of their focus has been to oppose what they perceive as the 'Islamification' of Britain. You may or may not think they have a point in that, but for me, 'Englishness' and the defence of it involves a lot more than the opposition to a single issue.

There are some who claim - rightly or wrongly - that the EDL is 'racist'. I do not doubt for a second that there are racists amongst their membership. I'm perfectly happy, too, to believe that a large numbers of their members are not racist at all.

However, we have - all week - been pointing to an article in The Guardian which we suggest amounts to an ideological incitement to the riots and looting that we saw over the last few days.

Let us look at one of those signatories:

"Lee Jasper, joint co-ordinator of Black Activists Rise Against Cuts (Barac)"

Okay, but the simple question is this... what would happen to a group called 'White Activists Rise Against Cuts'. Certainly, The Guardian sure as hell wouldn't want to be connected to them.

We saw this over the rioting and looting outrages too - Turkish, Kurdish and Sikh vigilante groups were applauded whereas white, working class groups joining together to protect their homes and communities were condemned.

And one of the difficulties is that many of us are too fearful of pointing this out in case we are accused of racism.

Let us first separate the "white, working class" from the more emotive grouping that is the EDL. Not all "white, working class" people are members of the EDL - not all EDL members are either working class nor even white.

We at this blog had an friendly exchange of messages on Twitter yesterday with a high profile journalist on a very respected newspaper. We won't name them, but they have our thanks. The journalist in question pointed us to an article by Patrick Hayes who describes himself as: "...a libertarian Marxist - on completely the other end of the political spectrum to groups like the BNP and National Front."

Speaking of the local vigilante patrols which took place in Enfield, he writes:

"On the train to Enfield, I had been reading dozens of tweets claiming the anti-riot patrol was a front for far-right organisations and an excuse for racist chants and violence. The reality was nothing of the sort. There were no weapons being carried and no violence erupted at all. Yes, the majority of people there were white and working class, but there was also a range of people from different ethnic backgrounds. Indeed I found, if anything, people on the patrol were overly awkward about the fact they were white. One guy told me he had been worried he'd be seen as a racist by taking part: 'There's no getting around the fact that a lot of the rioters are black,' he told me, 'but you can't just do nothing just in case someone calls you a racist.'"

Looking for some kind of explanation for the attitude of the State, he adds: "They see a crowd of people as a 'public order problem'. And they are scared of nothing more than the sight of groups of white working-class men - racist progroms-in-the-making - who speak in the wrong sort of un-PC language and who are loud and confrontational, and would rather they just dispersed and went home."

Certainly, any white, working class person watching TV over the period of the looting and rioting outrages would have been aware of visions of looters and rioters running amok - terrorising communities and torching London 'til it burned - all without police intervention.

Yet the first time they were shown pictures of the police controlling a large group was a live helicopter shot from Eltham where police had managed to flood the area to contain a group of people who - we were told - were a vigilante group and, from what we saw, were predominantly white.

My instinctive reaction - as someone with at least an average intelligence - was disgust. I was appalled by what I perceived to be an outrageous case of State racism against the white, working classes.

The very next day, the Prime Minister - David Cameron - was on his feet in the House of Commons.

We were alerted to one statement from the Prime Minister by the blogger The Anger of a Quiet Man. We've checked their facts independently, and they are quite right. This is in Hansard. But before looking at the line our neighbouring blogger is upset about, let us preface it with this statement from the PM:

"In the past few days, we have seen a range of emotions sweep this country: anger, fear, frustration, despair, sadness and, finally, a determined resolve that we will not let a violent few beat us. We saw that resolve in the people who gathered in Clapham, Manchester and Wolverhampton with brooms to clean up our streets. We saw it in those who patrolled the roads in Enfield through the night to deter rioters. We saw it in the hundreds of people who stood guard outside the Southall temple, protecting it from vandalism. This is a time for our country to pull together."

So the PM is clearly - and quite rightly - praising the Sikhs in Southall and those who patrolled Enfield.

Later, Virendra Sharma MP said to the PM: "On Tuesday night, all was quiet across Ealing, but there had been warnings that Southall might come under attack. Local people at the Sikh gurdwaras, mosques, Hindu temples and churches arranged to place volunteers outside their religious places of worship to protect them."

The PM responded by stating: "I think the whole country admires the protection of the temple in Ealing, Southall. I have huge admiration for those people who want to protect their homes, their properties and their communities. Of course, that should be the job of the police and we need to ensure that the police are on the streets in greater numbers to do that. I pay tribute to the people of Ealing, Southall for what they achieved."

So far, we have no great problem - but then we get to a sticking point. This comes later on when the PM states:

"On its attempt to say that it will somehow help to restore order, I have described some parts of our society as sick, and there is none sicker than the EDL."

All I know about the EDL is what the mass media allows me to know - and, of course, comments from people such as the Prime Minister.

Looking at the post from Anger of a Quiet Man, a link was posted to a webpage of the EDL. We checked it, looking to verify what was being claimed as the real story. It was true - this is, in full, what the EDL actually posted on their website. We're sure they won't mind us replicating it in full:

"Urgent Call for Action – Clean-Up Operations
By Pyrus in August 9th 2011

Already EDL supporters have taken to the streets to help defend their communities and prepare for the clean-up operations that must follow the last few days of rioting of looting.

We already have members organising themselves in London, Manchester, Liverpool, Norwich and Birmingham, and are also looking to organise efforts in Bristol, Leeds, Wolverhampton, Salford, Nottingham, Leicester and Hull.

If you live near to any of these areas, please contact your Division Leaders and Regional Organisers to find out what you can do to help, or speak to members on our forums or the official EDL Facebook page.

We are hoping to safeguard local businesses through a strong physical presence, and discourage trouble-makers from gathering in our town and city centres. No one should need reminding that the EDL condemn the use of violence: we need to stand with our communities, not do them a disservice like the rioters and looters continue to do.

The EDL, and all decent people, be they black, white, Christian, Sikh, Jewish or Muslim, are sickened by this mindless, selfish and ultimately self-defeating behaviour. We believe that it is our duty to stand united against to those who would seek to divide our communities.

This is not about Islam, it is a different form of radicalism. But if we truly believe that England is a place worth defending – and I’m sure we all do – then we cannot stand idly by.

Thank you."

Now, I'm sorry if I'm too politically correct to spot it, but I don't see what is so "sick" about what the English Defence League were saying there. Maybe the Prime Minister could tell us?

Maybe the police could tell us why they were controlling the white, working class in Eltham - because we all saw the live TV pictures.

Maybe society needs to discuss why vigilante groups of Sikhs or Turks or Kurds is good, but why groups of white, working class Englishmen is evil.

Maybe The Guardian could explain why it supports a group called 'Black Activists Rise Against Cuts' and why such a group should be allowed when a white equivalent obviously would not.

Maybe our politicians could explain why Scotland has a Parliament, Wales has an Assembly, the UK has a Parliament, but there is no voice for England.

Maybe the BBC could explain why the first time they have ever mentioned 'England' is in the context of the riots - leading to outrage online that the first time the BBC can be bothered to mention England is in the context of a negative occurrence.

We were really worried about posting this blog article because there are, doubtless, some very warped and twisted minds out there who would seek to twist it.

Yet I find myself in the position of realising that the politically correct elements that have damaged our society are passively acting as an Orwellian thought police. I find myself too scared to speak my mind.

That cannot be right. So, having looked at everything, I will say this...

Perhaps the white, working classes are now getting so sick to the back teeth of being called racist. Perhaps this feeling of alienation of the white, working class on the basis of racially motivated profiling and hounding is now widespread and becoming an issue.

If the politically correct politician wants to make this country a better place, then the racially motivated prejudices and attacks on the white, working class need to be discussed now - openly, honestly and without fear of being branded.

Because I have to say - if there is a group of people with a right to start complaining of victimisation motivated by race and class, the white, working class of England is certainly it.

The apologists for rioting and looting want to speak of alienation and disengagement?

Fine - but look at what you're doing to the white, working class of England - you're making them feel like the personification of evil, purely for existing.

And I think this is a dangerous resentment that the political class even now still continues to brew.

If the political class wants to find blame for the EDL's existence, they could start by looking in the mirror. The politically correct thought police are the EDL's biggest recruitment sergeant.

For the love of... the Sikhs!

Later, we'll be posting a possibly controversial article on the current racial discrimination against one group of people in modern society.

As a preface and because we're sure some warped people with political agenda will wish to twist it, we wanted to tell you something about where we are from.

This blog author was very PROUD of seeing the Sikh community rallying around each other in Southall to protect their homes, their businesses and temples against the vermin who were rioting, looting, and reducing London to flames.

That sense of pride stems, in part, from the fact that this blogger was born in a part of the country with a huge Sikh population. Consequently, two of my best friends at school were Sikhs.

So, to see such an awesome and much missed sense of community from people who I grew up with, in a way, was really pleasing.

Since moving to London, I have noticed a complete lack of Sikhs anywhere which I always found rather baffling, as every other ethnic background and nationality can be found in London. Now I know - they're all quietly getting on with life in Southall.

That's a little unusual... in my home town, they didn't occupy any particular 'Sikh' zones (and, just to contextualise that, do be aware that the Spanish people in Spain ridicule and actively avoid the unsightly 'English zones' - which is what the Spanish call them - that deface many Spanish coastal towns).

We digress. In my home town, the Sikhs were mostly happily integrated with the white working classes of whom I was part.

Sikh people that you passed in the street never made you feel unsafe - they were schoolfriends, the local shopkeeper, and - curiously - very often the bus driver. Not once did you ever fear that you might encounter violence from them - it was never their way.

The Sikhs really are worth mentioning because I often think of them when I hear of the need for racial equality laws, discrimination this, lack of opportunity that.

...because you never see anyone with a turban - a Sikh - on TV complaining about those things, do you? You never see a Sikh on a police 'Wanted' poster, do you?

Let me tell you why.

Growing up, the Sikhs I knew were incredibly, incredibly hard-working.

Okay, we might have ribbed them a little over the number of corner shops they owned... but boy, did they work hard in them. Open first thing in the morning, closed last thing at night - they are or were family businesses, utilising the extended family to ensure that the business was always well covered.

Those extended families were a great support base for all in them and, in noting that, I recall complaints from one of my schoolfriends about how his parents were strict. No stricter than mine, I hasten to add... but they brought, or bring, their children up with discipline and respect.

Discipline, respect and hard-work within a loyal, caring and protective community.

It is worth mentioning, as well, that no Sikh person has ever tried imposing their religious beliefs and practises on me. And I'll bet they haven't tried to impose them on you, either, have they? No.

I think that, because of these things, because they just get on with life, work hard and don't look for excuses to moan and whinge about everything... I think this is why Sikhs rarely complain about 'discrimination'.

They just get on with life and make no big fuss and present nobody with any huge demands except to be allowed to get on with things.

From the Sikhs, many could learn a great deal.

And, while we're at it, have you noticed that you never hear of or see anyone from an 'Oriental' background complaining about how unfairly treated they are?

Making more sense of the looting and rioting rampage: More Agendas Exposed?

This morning on Sky News, Nick Clegg (vomit) uttered the immortal line: "If people want to protest that, they can come to Parliament Square and do so."

Really, Nick? You're assuming that people will take the time to APPLY for a PERMIT to voice any democratic concerns in a legitimate, peaceful protest at Parliament.

Of course, as we see with the G20 protests and others like it, the elite are very protected.

In the last few days, it wasn't Government or the City of London being terrorised - it was normal people in their own homes and in their communities.

No police available to protect the taxpayer, but as many as are necessary to protect the elite. Odd that.

As part of our post yesterday where we asked whether the rioting and looting was an engineered act of political subversion, we linked to a Daily Mail report which read:

"Why police were so soft on London looters: They 'were ordered to stand and observe' as capital burned".

Okay, so what do we have in the newspapers today to add to that one?

Look at this headline from the Daily Express, quoting authorities in Malaysia:

"UK VIOLENCE 'JUSTIFIES PROTEST BAN'"

Uh-huh. Would anybody object if I linked those two reports in mind?

Ickle jigsaw puzzle pieces, just arranging them to see if they fit.

Add to that one more story.

While London burned, many people had their eye off the ball. So, we're grateful to one of our Twitter friends for pointing this article out.

It was published in the Daily Telegraph on 7th September 2009.

It reads:

"UN wants new global currency to replace dollar"

We are talking about global government - a 'New World Order'.

Now, that might cause a few protests.

Keep that in mind when you hear the economic news that keeps coming out over the next hours, days and weeks.

And ask yourself... nobody would engineer a deliberate global economic collapse, would they?

Just as no political interests would exploit some useful verminous idiots to start nationwide looting and rioting rampages.

Would they?

Quote of the Day: 10th August 2011

"It's simply not true to suggest the BBC has portrayed these events as protests. Our role as with any story is to accurately reflect what is happening."

- Mary Hockaday, BBC

We normally find something profound or interesting to say in response to our 'Quote of the Day' posts. Or, at least, we try.

On this occasion, 'Bollocks, love.' seems to suffice.

Are these riots and looting sprees an act of subversion?

The question has to be asked - are these riots and looting sprees an act of subversion?

Let me talk you through what is making me start to suspect that they could be.

We keep on pointing to this article in The Guardian which called for "the development of a national co-ordinating coalition of resistance".

Published a year ago, it was a letter undersigned by those generally described as 'the left' which almost entirely included trade unions, student groups and ethnic campaigners.

It was a letter published by The Guardian. No 'conspiracy theory'...

So, then we find this story in The Mirror: "London riots: Teacher, 31, pleads guilty to looting as court cases start".

A teacher? Amazing you might say.

Then we have a totally separate story in the Evening Standard which informs us that: "A London academic is using Twitter to advise rioters on how to avoid being caught by the police."

Later in the report, the subject is also revealed to be a "Left-wing blogger".

Not in our mainstream media, Alex Jones looks at social media and reports that: "In a message that was forwarded to Leicestershire police, a Twitter user called “leicestertalk” wrote, “AadamSparkzz & his mates just offered money by these journos to start a riot in #Leicester.”"

Let's go back to that article in The Guardian once more.

I make no direct allegation, but I'm sure as hell going to ask the question.

You will have all seen the BBC and some Labour politicians uniting to push an apologist narrative based around "the cuts" - cuts which have not even yet been implemented against a background of still rising public expenditure.

There is something about this building narrative that looks very, very dodgy indeed.

It may well be that what we are witnessing is far more sinister than even the rioting and looting.

UPDATE at 15:24
You do not have to be a 'conspiracy theorist' on any of this. Just look at jigsaw puzzle pieces and see if they go together. They may, they may not. What this blog always does, however, is to provide a link to stories we're citing - normally always in credible sources.

One thing that people have been thinking suspicious was the way that the public appeared unprotected when the rioting and looting kicked off.

Just published, the Daily Mail is now reporting: "Why police were so soft on London looters: They 'were ordered to stand and observe' as capital burned".

Separately, the newspaper also headlines with a story informing us that: "Spooks trail BlackBerry Messenger ringleaders" - we're glad. In everything we post, we're not daft - we think there's a very good chance that the spooky people will pass by occasionally. We hope that MI5 do a bloody fantastic job of getting to the bottom of all this.

See also:
UK Column - Riots and Unrest in British Cities - Coordinated by Blackberries - Oh Really!

Will the elite realise that the various vigilante groups are the pride of Britain?

As the mollycoddled vermin that have torched and looted Britain find condemnation and little sympathy in the eyes of most of Britain - apart from with the same apologists who created them in the first place - something new has happened.

The resurrection of British decency prepared to stand up to the effects of subversive 'liberal' apologensia.

It began in London with reports of the Turkish community banding together to chase the criminal vermin out of the streets. Then came news that Kurdish communities were involved.

Last night, extraordinary scenes in Southall where four hundred or more Sikhs gathered to defend their communities and temples. They, like the Turks before them, were cheered and applauded by most decent British people on social media sites - a sentiment no doubt felt throughout the rest of the country.

Then came Enfield where, finally, the white Englishman rallied together and patrolled the streets. Peaceful, they vowed to place any vermin under citizens arrest. Yet - as expected from the system that has created the criminal underclass that has terrorised Britain - they were 'kettled'. Sky News opined that: "...the peacemakers became the policed."

On the BBC - where a parade of apologists has been trotted out seeking to mollycoddle and 'listen' to the marauding looting terrorists - a Conservative MP, Michael Gove, forced a condemnation out of Labour's Harriet Harman... to much applause on social media.

We've all seen - both online and on TV - various vermin elements openly admitting that their rampant criminality is nothing to do with politics and current affairs, but solely motivated by anarchy and material greed.

With the bad, there is always a good - and another group of people who have won applause are those who have used social media positively to voluntarily organise community minded clear-ups after vermin has left criminal carnage in its wake.

What these vermin need is not dispensations or understanding - they need discipline; some good strong parenting and some old school teaching standards to teach them morality and the difference between right and wrong.

Tomorrow, Parliament will meet and discuss what is to 'be done about it'. We are trying to ensure that Members of Parliament see The Guardian article that we believe represents an ideological incitement.

From what we're seeing online, the British people - the majority of people removed from ideological conditioning anyway - couldn't care less what the 'reasons' are for the rampant criminality that has terrorised the nation.

The vast majority of people do not want concessions and diversity officers to be granted to the marauding mob. They want them to receive some discipline - the clip around the ear that, had they received it earlier in childhood, might have prevented this disgraceful unrest.

Discipline that has been lacking through subversive ideologies and agendas.

Sadly, those subversive ideologies and agendas permeate British media where a platform for apologists for the lawless vermin is still happily extended.

However, such sympathies are not to be found in the majority of decent British homes and communities.

This country does not need laws and regulations to make us all 'politically correct'.

Look at those groups of vigilantes - they are Turks, they are Kurds, they are Sikhs and they are Englishmen. It is these people who have been applauded for their community mindedness that has provided peace of mind.

Acceptance is found through one's behaviour - it is not delivered by an equal opportunities driven, political correctness enforced silence.

What we're seeing is assorted and various groups of people of various ethnicities, standing together to sweep the streets of cretinous, undisciplined, materialistic, lazy, over-pampered and excessively conceded-to vermin who think the world owes them a living.

Let's see if Parliament can actually get to the heart of the matter tomorrow - for our politicians, too, must earn the respect and the social acceptance of the decent majority through their conduct and actions.

See also:
Daily Telegraph - London Riots: Residents Fight Back
Daily Mail - Years of liberal dogma have spawned a generation of amoral, uneducated, welfare dependent, brutalised youngsters
City AM - Britain’s in crisis: the real causes of chaos on streets
The Independent - Britain has experienced its Katrina moment

Nigel Farage's statement on a country in turmoil

Gerard Batten: Call troops back from Afghanistan to deal with looters

See also:
Pravda - Britain falls victim to its own cult of absurd tolerance

Help the Met and West Midlands Police identify looting suspects

Below are the first appeal pages from police forces looking to identify the marauding criminals who, collectively, terrorised the UK as they engaged in a feral looting spree yesterday.

As these actions of looters caused so much terror and breached the concepts of common law, we're happy to link to the appeal pages of the Met and West Midlands Police forces and request our readers in the area might lend a hand in identifying these suspects:

CLICK HERE for Met Police appeal

CLICK HERE for West Midlands appeal

Did left-wing extremists inspire London riots?

As a Londoner, this blogger is thoroughly depressed today. Thoroughly. And also ever so slightly nervous and intimidated, too.

However, two newspaper articles to flag up for the post-mortem.

This one and this one.

We make no accusations. However, all of us are asking questions.

Those two newspaper articles need to be part of the post-mortem and debated.

This seems particularly pertinent when people like Ken Livingstone and various employees of the BBC are following a similar narrative in a bid to try to excuse the scenes of feral criminality that have terrorised London and other areas of the UK.

Warzone Britain: What worthwhile words can we say?

The common law principles about which this blog often muses dictate that lawful actions are those which do not cause harm, loss or injury.

London, however, licks it's wounds after a third day and night of lawless thuggery and criminality. More businesses looted and ransacked. Premises torched.

More disturbingly, the criminal vermin marauding through our streets turned their attention to private, residential homes, too.

As the news unfolded live on our TV screens with an unrelenting horror, those of us in London not at the epicentres of lawlessness nevertheless felt fear as the capital became encircled in what may have been sporadic outbreaks but which somehow also looked suspiciously like highly intelligent orchestrated attacks.

The capital city was under siege - a war zone.

Yet any thoughts of fleeing London for the safety of the rest of the country subsided as reports came through of lawless criminality sweeping throughout pockets of the nation.

We, all of us, no doubt shared a complete sense of bafflement and helplessness as Sky News reporters informed us that in location after location, there was no police presence to be found.

To the television viewer, there must have been a sense of being abandoned, unprotected. Indeed, the popular heroes on social media site Twitter were groups of Turkish and Asian men who - in various areas of London - defended their homes, business and communities from the wicked, marauding gangs who sought to cause them harm.

Many of us, tonight, have our private - and some public - thoughts on all that we have been witness to.

We are all of us in shock, many of us in fear, totally in a sense of disbelief.

Just what is this country and what has it become?

Some would seek to blame the Government of the day. It must be remembered that they have only been in power since May last year.

This problem extends much further back than that.

Clearly, the common law principles have not filtered down to these criminal elements who have damaged this nation to such an unimaginable and horrific scale.

Also clear, from what we have witnessed, is that somewhere along the line - or rather, nowhere along the line - the perpetrators of this evil criminality have failed to be taught by anyone what the difference is between right and wrong.

The immediate group of people who need to ask themselves questions are parents. What are parents teaching their children if not the difference between right and wrong? If not instilling enough discipline in their children that they would grow up to carry out this degree of criminal carnage?

There must be a post-mortem to these incidents.

However, it does seem to be a defining moment in the lifeblood of this nation.

Certainly, the post-mortem must ensure it spends less time listening to the perpetrators of this rampant lawlessness. Instead, it is essential now that the Government and all public servants listens to those of us who are - as a nation - all victims in a nation that has been ransacked and terrorised by lawless and out of control thugs.

See also:
Melanie Phillips - London descends into anarchy