The Talking Clock is an opinion based, independently authored, small 'c' conservative, libertarian blog.
"The laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens, who shall ascend the throne of this realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively, according to the same."
Act of Settlement, 1700/01
"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."
Bill of Rights, 1689
- an important and still exisiting part of OUR both written and unwritten English constitution
Saturday, 25 February 2012
Ahhh. So there was more to 7/7 than some lunatics in Luton? You don't say!
In the same paragraph as 9/11 - though with less emphasis - comes our very own 7/7.
Just to recap the official story, a group of religiously inspired lunatics boarded a train (which had been cancelled so didn't run) in Luton and unleashed carnage on the London transport system with home made explosives made out of peroxide (or something).
Raids aplenty, lunatics detained, everybody's civil liberties curtailed by the Labour Government (which just so happened to have contracts for biometric identity cards handily in place), the BBC using the exercise to be politically correct and not mention the word 'terrorist' (but at least the BBC didn't announce any buildings collapsing into their own footprint half an hour before they happened as they did with New York's Building Seven).
So, that's it. You're back up to speed.
Or are you?
The Daily Telegraph has a fascinating, intriguing story today.
Got that? Not Alex Jones, not David Icke, not internet oddballs who believe we're all about to experience the rapture.
Nope - the Daily Telegraph.
Not the Daily Express which was relentless in pushing for the truth about the death of Diana (of which, we still know only part).
Not the Daily Mail which has been relentless in pushing for the truth about Dr. David Kelly (which was such an open and closed case of suicide with a blunt spoon that we're banned from knowing anything for seventy years from a Government with nothing to hide).
Nope - the Daily Telegraph.
It reports: "Members of an Asian head of state's family have funded al-Qaeda and had advance knowledge of the July 7 terrorist attacks on London, according to claims made public by MPs and peers on Friday."
So, what? These lunatics in their bedrooms in Luton... they were making phone calls to international heads of State telling them exactly what they were up to, were they?
Or can we think of any perfectly good reasons why people with death through terrorism in mind might not do such a thing?
So how did "an Asian head of state's family" know in advance about the death and carnage about to be inflicted upon an innocent London population, then?
And if an "Asian head of state's family" had advance knowledge of 7/7, why did our intelligence people apparently not have a clue? Were they all busy on an extended tea break watching the latest DVD boxset of Spooks?
And, is it not strange that there are many claims of international heads of state who supposedly had advance knowledge of the attacks of 9/11, too?
Further, is it not also strange that both on 9/11 and 7/7, there were 'drills' taking place simulating the exact events which were miraculously to take place on those exact same days in the exact same locations?
Utterly amazing.
No, hang on... I'll get a grip.
It was clearly a handful of lunatics from Luton intent on killing us all with some devices they made in their bedrooms out of peroxide.
In which case, I'd better surrender all of my civil liberties, be monitored, catalogued, retina scanned and microchipped at the State's behest.
After all, 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear' and all that.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
This blog seeks to uphold the right to free speech. However, comment moderation is used to prevent the posting of comments which could be considered libelous/offensive etc. We do not, however, guarantee to publish all comments and we reserve the right to refuse to approve any comment submitted at our discretion. Views expressed are those of the comment author and do not neccesarily reflect those of this blog.